The ability of artificial intelligence tools to formulate orthopaedic clinical decisions in comparison to human clinicians: An analysis of ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4, and Bard.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked interest in its integration into clinical medicine and education. This study evaluates the performance of three AI tools compared to human clinicians in addressing complex orthopaedic decisions in real-world clinical cases.

Questions/purposes

To evaluate the ability of commonly used AI tools to formulate orthopaedic clinical decisions in comparison to human clinicians.

Patients and methods

The study used OrthoBullets Cases, a publicly available clinical cases collaboration platform where surgeons from around the world choose treatment options based on peer-reviewed standardised treatment polls. The clinical cases cover various orthopaedic categories. Three AI tools, (ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4, an

SUBMITTER: Agharia S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10749221 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature