Dataset Information

Exploring the microbial landscape: uncovering the pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the etiology, clinical features, and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults. Understanding the causative pathogens is essential for effective treatment and prevention.

Design

Between 2016-2018, 518 hospitalized adults with CAP and 241 controls without symptoms were prospectively enrolled. Urine samples were collected for pneumococcal urinary antigen tests and nasopharyngeal swabs for viral and bacterial analysis, combined with routine diagnostic care.

Results

Among the included CAP patients, Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common pathogen, detected in 28% of patients, followed by Haemophilus influenzae in 16%. Viruses were identified in 28%, and concurrent viruses and bacteria were detected in 15%. There was no difference in mortality, length of stay, or symptoms at hospitalization when comparing patients with bacterial, viral, or mixed etiologies. Among the control subjects without respiratory symptoms, S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis were detected in 5-7%, and viruses in 7%.

Conclusion

Streptococcus pneumoniae emerged as the predominant cause of CAP, followed closely by viruses and H. influenzae. Intriguingly, symptoms and outcome were similar regardless of etiology. These findings highlight the complexity of this respiratory infection and emphasize the importance of comprehensive diagnostic and treatment strategies.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT03606135].

SUBMITTER: Hansen K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10752608 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Exploring the microbial landscape: uncovering the pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients.

Hansen Karin K Yamba Yamba Linda L Wasserstrom Lisa L Rünow Elisabeth E Göransson Tommy T Nilsson Anna A Ahl Jonas J Riesbeck Kristian K

Frontiers in public health 20231213

<h4>Objectives</h4>This study aimed to investigate the etiology, clinical features, and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults. Understanding the causative pathogens is essential for effective treatment and prevention.<h4>Design</h4>Between 2016-2018, 518 hospitalized adults with CAP and 241 controls without symptoms were prospectively enrolled. Urine samples were collected for pneumococcal urinary antigen tests and nasopharyngeal swabs for viral and bacterial analysis, combine ...[more]

PMID: 38152664

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEmpirical antibiotic coverage for atypical pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has long been debated, mainly because of a lack of epidemiological data. We aimed to assess both testing for atypical pathogens and their prevalence in hospitalized patients with CAP worldwide, especially in relation with disease severity.MethodsA secondary analysis of the GLIMP database, an international, multicentre, point-prevalence study of adult patients admitted for CAP in 222 hospitals across 6 continents in 2015, was performed. The study evaluated frequency of testing for atypical pathogens, including L. pneumophila, M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, and their prevalence. Risk factors for testing and prevalence for atypical pathogens were assessed through univariate analysis.ResultsAmong 3702 CAP patients 1250 (33.8%) underwent at least one test for atypical pathogens. Testing varies greatly among countries and its frequency was higher in Europe than elsewhere (46.0% vs. 12.7%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Detection of L. pneumophila urinary antigen was the most common test performed worldwide (32.0%). Patients with severe CAP were less likely to be tested for both atypical pathogens considered together (30.5% vs. 35.0%, p = 0.009) and specifically for legionellosis (28.3% vs. 33.5%, p = 0.003) than the rest of the population. Similarly, L. pneumophila testing was lower in ICU patients. At least one atypical pathogen was isolated in 62 patients (4.7%), including M. pneumoniae (26/251 patients, 10.3%), L. pneumophila (30/1186 patients, 2.5%), and C. pneumoniae (8/228 patients, 3.5%). Patients with CAP due to atypical pathogens were significantly younger, showed less cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic comorbidities in comparison to adult patients hospitalized due to non-atypical pathogen CAP.ConclusionsTesting for atypical pathogens in patients admitted for CAP in poorly standardized in real life and does not mirror atypical prevalence in different settings. Further evidence on the impact of atypical pathogens, expecially in the low-income countries, is needed to guidelines implementation.

Project description:BackgroundCommunity acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a high incidence disease resulting in about 260,000 hospital admissions per year in Germany, more than myocardial infarction or stroke. Worldwide, CAP is the most frequent infectious disease with high lethality ranging from 1.2 % in those 20-29 years old to over 10 % in patients older than 70 years, even in industrial nations. CAP poses numerous medical challenges, which the PROGRESS (Pneumonia Research Network on Genetic Resistance and Susceptibility for the Evolution of Severe Sepsis) network aims to tackle: Operationalization of disease severity throughout the course of disease, outcome prediction for hospitalized patients and prediction of transitions from uncomplicated CAP to severe CAP, and finally, to CAP with sepsis and organ failure as a life-threatening condition. It is a major aim of PROGRESS to understand and predict patient heterogeneity regarding outcome in the hospital and to develop novel treatment concepts.MethodsPROGRESS was designed as a clinical, observational, multi-center study of patients with CAP requiring hospitalization. More than 1600 patients selected for low burden of co-morbidities have been enrolled, aiming at a total of 3000. Course of disease, along with therapy, was closely monitored by daily assessments and long-term follow-up. Daily blood samples allow in depth molecular-genetic characterization of patients. We established a well-organized workflow for sample logistics and a comprehensive data management system to collect and manage data from more than 50 study centers in Germany and Austria. Samples are stored in a central biobank and clinical data are stored in a central data base which also integrates all data from molecular assessments.DiscussionWith the PROGRESS study, we established a comprehensive data base of high quality clinical and molecular data allowing investigation of pressing research questions regarding CAP. In-depth molecular characterization will contribute to the discovery of disease mechanisms and establishment of diagnostic and predictive biomarkers. A strength of PROGRESS is the focus on younger patients with low burden of co-morbidities, allowing a more direct look at host biology with less confounding. As a resulting limitation, insights from PROGRESS will require validation in representative patient cohorts to assess clinical utility.Trial registrationThe PROGRESS study was retrospectively registered on May 24(th), 2016 with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02782013.

Dataset Information

Exploring the microbial landscape: uncovering the pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients.

Objectives

Design

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Exploring the microbial landscape: uncovering the pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets