Procedural and one-year outcomes of robotic-assisted versus manual percutaneous coronary intervention.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (rPCI) has proven to be feasible and safe. Comparative analyses of rPCI versus manual PCI (mPCI) are scarce.

Aims

We aimed to investigate procedural aspects and outcomes of rPCI using the second-generation CorPath GRX Vascular Robotic System compared with mPCI in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction acute coronary syndrome.

Methods

From January to April 2021, 70 patients underwent rPCI at the University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and were recruited into the INTERCATH study. By propensity score matching, a control cohort of 210 patients who underwent mPCI from 2015-2021 was identified. Co-primary endpoints were one-year all-cause mortality

SUBMITTER: Bay B 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10756222 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature