Dataset Information

Reproducibility and predictive value of three grading systems for intraoperative adverse events in a cohort of abdominal surgery.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) are increasingly recognized for their impact on patient outcomes. The Kaafarani classification and Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) were developed to assess the intraoperative course, however, both have their drawbacks. ClassIntra® was validated for iAEs of any origin. This study compares the Kaafarani and SAS to ClassIntra® considering predictive value and interrater reliability in a cohort of abdominal surgery to support implementation of a classification in clinical practice.

Methods

We made use of the LAParotomy or LAParoscopy and ADhesiolysis (LAPAD) study database of elective abdominal surgery. Detailed descriptions on iAEs were collected in real-time by a researcher. For the current research aim, all iAEs were graded according ClassIntra®, Kaafarani, and SAS (score ≤4). The predictive value was assessed using uni- and multivariable linear regression and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Two teams graded ClassIntra® and Kaafarani to assess the interrater reliability using Cohen's Kappa.

Results

A total of 755 surgeries were included, in which 335 (44%) iAEs were graded according to ClassIntra®, 228 (30%) to Kaafarani, and 130 (20%) to SAS. All classifications were significantly correlated to postoperative complications, with an AUROC of 0.67 (95% CI 0.62-0.72), 0.64 (0.59-0.70), and 0.71 (0.56-0.76), respectively. For the secondary endpoint, the interrater reliability of ClassIntra® with κ 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.90) and Kaafarani 0.90 (95% 0.87-0.93) was both strong.

Conclusion

ClassIntra®, Kaafarani and SAS can be used for reporting of iAEs in abdominal surgery with good predictive value for postoperative complications, with strong reliability. ClassIntra®, compared with Kaafarani and SAS, included the most iAEs and has the most comprehensive definition suitable for uniform reporting of iAEs in clinical practice and research.

SUBMITTER: Gawria L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10793815 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Reproducibility and predictive value of three grading systems for intraoperative adverse events in a cohort of abdominal surgery.

Gawria L L Krielen P P Stommel M W J MWJ van Goor H H Ten Broek R P G RPG

International journal of surgery (London, England) 20240101 1

<h4>Introduction</h4>Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) are increasingly recognized for their impact on patient outcomes. The Kaafarani classification and Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) were developed to assess the intraoperative course; however, both have their drawbacks. ClassIntra was validated for iAEs of any origin. This study compares the Kaafarani and SAS to ClassIntra considering predictive value and interrater reliability in a cohort of abdominal surgery to support implementation of a cla ...[more]

PMID: 38000068

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAdverse intraoperative events (AIEs) during surgery are a well-known entity. A better understanding of the incidence of AIEs and their relationship with outcomes is helpful for surgeon preparation and preoperative patient counseling. The goals of this study are to describe the incidence of AIEs during bariatric surgery and examine their impact on major adverse complications.Study designThe study included 5,882 subjects who had bariatric surgery in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study between March 2005 and April 2009. Prospectively collected AIEs included organ injuries, anesthesia-related events, anastomotic revisions, and equipment failure. The relationship between AIEs and a composite end point of 30-day major adverse complications (ie, death, venous thromboembolism, percutaneous, endoscopic, or operative reintervention and failure to be discharged from the hospital within 30 days from surgery) was evaluated using a multivariable relative risk model adjusting for factors known to influence their risk.ResultsThere were 1,608 laparoscopic adjusted gastric banding, 3,770 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operations, and 504 open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operations. Adverse intraoperative events occurred in 5% of the overall sample and were most frequent during open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (7.3%), followed by laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (5.5%) and laparoscopic adjusted gastric banding (3%). The rate of composite end point was 8.8% in the AIE group compared with 3.9% among those without an AIE (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that patients with an AIE were at 90% greater risk of composite complication than those without an event (relative risk = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.26-2.88; p = 0.002), independent of the type of procedure (open or laparoscopic).ConclusionsIncidence of an AIE is not infrequent during bariatric surgery and is associated with much higher risk of major complication. Additional study is needed to assess the association between specific AIEs and short-term complications.

Project description:BackgroundIntraoperative adverse events (iAEs) are associated with adverse postoperative outcomes and cause a significant healthcare burden. However, a critical appraisal of iAEs is lacking. Considering the details of iAEs could benefit postoperative care. We comprehensively analyzed iAEs in a large series including all types of operations and their relation to postoperative complications.MethodsAll patients enrolled in the multicenter ClassIntra® validation study (NCT03009929) were included in this analysis. The surgical and anesthesia team prospectively recorded all iAEs. Two researchers, blinded to each other's ratings, appraised all recorded iAEs according to their origin into four categories: surgery, anesthesia, organization, or other, including subcategories such as organ injury, arrhythmia, or instrument failure. They further descriptively analyzed subcategories of all iAEs. Postoperative complications were assessed using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), a weighted sum of all postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The association of iAE origins in addition to the severity grade of ClassIntra® on CCI® was assessed with a multivariable mixed-effects generalized linear regression analysis.ResultsOf 2520 included patients, 778 iAEs were recorded in 610 patients. The origin was surgical in 420 (54%), anesthesia in 283 (36%), organizational in 34 (4%), and other in 41 (5%) events. Bleeding (n = 217, 28%), hypotension (n = 118, 15%), and organ injury (n = 98, 13%) were the three most frequent subcategories in surgery and anesthesia, respectively. In the multivariable mixed-effect analysis, no significant association between the origin and CCI® was observed.ConclusionAnalyzing the type and origin of an iAE offers individualized and contextualized information. This detailed descriptive information can be used for targeted surveillance of intra- and postoperative care, even though the overall predictive value for postoperative events was not improved by adding the origin in addition to the severity grade.

Project description:BackgroundPerioperative β-blocker therapy has been associated with increased risk of stroke. However, the association between β-blocker initiation before the day of surgery and the risk of stroke is unknown. The authors hypothesized there would be no association between preoperative β-blocker initiation within 60 days of surgery or chronic β-blockade (more than 60 days) and the risk of stroke in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.MethodsData on elective major abdominal surgery were obtained from the IBM (USA) Truven Health MarketScan 2005 to 2015 Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. Patients were stratified by β-blocker dispensing exposure: (1) β-blocker-naïve, (2) preoperative β-blocker initiation within 60 days of surgery, and (3) chronic β-blocker dispensing (more than 60 days). The authors compared in-hospital stroke and major adverse cardiac events between the different β-blocker therapy exposures.ResultsThere were 204,981 patients who underwent major abdominal surgery. β-Blocker exposure was as follows: perioperative initiation within 60 days of surgery for 4,026 (2.0%) patients, chronic β-blocker therapy for 45,424 (22.2%) patients, and β-blocker-naïve for 155,531 (75.9%) patients. The unadjusted frequency of stroke for patients with β-blocker initiation (0.4%, 17 of 4,026) and chronic β-blocker therapy (0.4%, 171 of 45,424) was greater than in β-blocker-naïve patients (0.2%, 235 of 155,531; P < 0.001). After propensity score weighting, patients initiated on a β-blocker within 60 days of surgery (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.31 to 2.04; P = 0.757) or on chronic β-blocker therapy (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.15; P = 0.901) demonstrated similar stroke risk compared to β-blocker-naïve patients. Patients on chronic β-blocker therapy demonstrated lower adjusted risk of major adverse cardiac events compared to β-blocker-naïve patients (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.91; P = 0.007), despite higher unadjusted absolute event rate (2.6% [1,173 of 45,424] vs. 0.6% [872 of 155,531]).ConclusionsAmong patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, the authors observed no association between preoperative β-blocker initiation within 60 days of surgery or chronic β-blocker therapy and stroke.Editor’s perspective

Dataset Information

Reproducibility and predictive value of three grading systems for intraoperative adverse events in a cohort of abdominal surgery.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Reproducibility and predictive value of three grading systems for intraoperative adverse events in a cohort of abdominal surgery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets