Dataset Information

Incarcerated Small Bowel Herniation in a Stoma Mimicking Sigmoid End Colostomy Prolapse.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

A stoma prolapse is easy to diagnose by visual examination, and it rarely incarcerates. Therefore, manual reduction is usually performed as soon as the diagnosis is made. In this report, we describe a case of stoma prolapse that could not be reduced manually and ruptured because an incarcerated parastomal hernia occurred in the stoma, mimicking stoma prolapse.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old woman underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, omentectomy, resection of dissemination, and low anterior resection with formation of a sigmoid end colostomy for endometrial cancer with infiltration of the rectum. Fourteen months after the initial operation, she presented with stoma prolapse and multiple episodes of vomiting. The prolapsed stoma was 20 cm in length, appeared swollen and edematous, and was somewhat firm. Although it looked viable, some of the mucosa was darkish red, indicating congestion. Therefore, the diagnosis was sigmoid end colostomy prolapse with an ischemic component. An attempt at manual reduction resulted in rupture, so an emergency laparotomy was performed. Intraoperatively, we found that the ileum was incarcerated in the aperture created where the colostomy had been formed. When the incarcerated ileum was released, the stoma prolapse could be reduced easily. The end colostomy was refashioned in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen.

Conclusion

An incarcerated parastomal hernia can mimic stoma prolapse. If the findings differ from those of typical stoma prolapse, imaging should be performed to confirm whether another clinical entity is involved in the stoma prolapse.

SUBMITTER: Abe K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10798682 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Incarcerated Small Bowel Herniation in a Stoma Mimicking Sigmoid End Colostomy Prolapse.

Abe Kaoru K Yamai Daisuke D Katsumi Chihiro C Oyamatsu Manabu M Sato Kenji K

Case reports in gastroenterology 20240119 1

<h4>Introduction</h4>A stoma prolapse is easy to diagnose by visual examination, and it rarely incarcerates. Therefore, manual reduction is usually performed as soon as the diagnosis is made. In this report, we describe a case of stoma prolapse that could not be reduced manually and ruptured because an incarcerated parastomal hernia occurred in the stoma, mimicking stoma prolapse.<h4>Case presentation</h4>A 66-year-old woman underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic a ...[more]

PMID: 38249996

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare surgeons' intraoperative surgeon acceptability or assessment of the operative field regarding bowel contents and patients' satisfaction with or without a mechanical bowel preparation before reconstructive vaginal prolapse surgery.MethodsIn this single-blind, randomized trial, women scheduled to undergo vaginal prolapse surgery with a planned apical suspension and posterior colporrhaphy were allocated using block randomization to an intervention or control group. Surgeons were blinded to patient allocation. One day before surgery, mechanical bowel preparation instructions consisted of a clear liquid diet and two self-administered saline enemas; the participants in the control group sustained a regular diet and nothing by mouth after midnight. The primary outcome was surgeons' intraoperative assessment of the surgical field regarding bowel content as measured on a 4-point Likert scale (1, excellent; 4, poor). Secondary outcomes included participant satisfaction and bowel symptoms. The primary outcome was determined by intention-to-treat analysis and other analyses were per protocol.ResultsOf the 150 women randomized (75 women to intervention and control group), 145 completed the study. No differences existed in the demographic, clinical, and intraoperative characteristics between groups (P>.05). Surgeons' intraoperative assessment rating was 85% "excellent or good" with bowel preparation compared with 90% for participants in the control group (odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-1.61; P=.30). The bowel preparation group was less likely to report "complete" satisfaction compared with the participants in the control group (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04-0.35; P<.001). Abdominal fullness and cramping, fatigue, anal irritation, and hunger pains were greater in the bowel preparation group (all P<.01).ConclusionBefore reconstructive vaginal surgery, mechanical bowel preparation conferred no benefit regarding surgeons' intraoperative assessment of the operative field, reflected decreased patient satisfaction, and had increased abdominal symptoms.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01431040.Level of evidenceI.

Dataset Information

Incarcerated Small Bowel Herniation in a Stoma Mimicking Sigmoid End Colostomy Prolapse.

Introduction

Case presentation

Conclusion

Publications

Incarcerated Small Bowel Herniation in a Stoma Mimicking Sigmoid End Colostomy Prolapse.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets