Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors [PD-(L)1 inhibitors] for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC).

Materials and methods

Four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and 21 CENTRAL) were searched for articles studying neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors for MIBC. The search time period was from the establishment of each database to 21 July 2023. Meta-analyses of pCR, pPR, Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate, RFS, and OS were performed.

Results

In total, 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. The overall pooled pCR of neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.36 (95%CI=0.30-0.42, p=0.00). In subgroup meta-analysis, the pooled PCR of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.27 (95%CI=0.19-0.35, p=0.1), 0.41 (95%CI=0.21-0.62, p=0.01), 0.43 (95%CI=0.35-0.50, p=0.06), respectively. The overall pooled pPR of neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.53 (95%CI=0.46-0.60, p=0.00). In subgroup meta-analysis, the pooled pPR of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.36 (95%CI=0.22-0.51, p=0.01), 0.51 (95%CI=0.39-0.62, p=0.43), and 0.61 (95%CI=0.53-0.69, p=0.01), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and RFS were reconstructed, but there was no significant difference among three groups in terms of OS or RFS. The pooled result of Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate for neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.15 (95%CI=0.09-0.22, p=0.00%). In subgroup analysis, the pooled result of Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate for PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.07 (95%CI=0.04-0.11, p=0.84), 0.31 (95%CI=0.16-0.47, p=0.06), and 0.17 (95%CI=0.06-0.31, I² = 71.27%, p=0.01), respectively.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors were feasible and safe for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Compared with PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy were associated with higher pCR and pPR, but higher Grade≥3 irAEs. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and RFS indicated that neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors had an acceptable long-term prognostic, but it was not possible to discern statistical differences between the three neoadjuvant subgroups.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023452437, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42023452437).

SUBMITTER: Huang S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10803485 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huang Shibo S Huang Yanping Y Li Chunyan C Liang Yiwen Y Huang Miaoyan M Luo Raoshan R Liang Weiming W

Frontiers in immunology 20240109

<h4>Introduction</h4>This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors [PD-(L)1 inhibitors] for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and 21 CENTRAL) were searched for articles studying neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors for MIBC. The search time period was from the establishment of each database to 21 July 2023. Meta-analyses of pCR, pPR, Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate ...[more]

PMID: 38264649

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. DESIGN:Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. REVIEW METHODS:Studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods. RESULTS:4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS:PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy.

Project description:BackgroundPD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors have emerged as promising therapies for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), but their efficacy and safety profiles require further evaluation. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in this patient population.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with data sourced from PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CNKI up to August 3, 2024. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1680 patients were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR), while safety was assessed through adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥ 3 AEs. Effect sizes were calculated using mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsOverall, the meta-analysis showed that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not significantly extend OS (MD = 0.86, 95% CI: -0.55, 2.27), but they significantly improved PFS (MD = 2.53, 95% CI: 0.92, 4.15). Additionally, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not significantly increase the ORR compared to controls (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.44). In terms of safety, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not significantly increase the incidence of overall AEs. Subgroup analysis further indicated that PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved OS (MD = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.20, 2.29) and PFS (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 0.56, 11.97), while PD-L1 inhibitors did not have a significant impact on these outcomes. Additionally, PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of grade ≥ 3 AEs (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.57), a risk not observed with PD-1 inhibitors.ConclusionPD-1 inhibitors significantly improve PFS and OS in advanced CRC, making them a preferable option over PD-L1 inhibitors, which show limited efficacy and a higher risk of severe AEs. These findings support prioritizing PD-1 inhibitors in clinical practice for this patient group, while caution is warranted with PD-L1 inhibitors due to their safety concerns.Trial registrationPROSPERO (CRD42024611696).

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Systematic review registration

Publications

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets