Dataset Information

Air pollution benefits from reduced on-road activity due to COVID-19 in the United States.

ABSTRACT: On-road transportation is one of the largest contributors to air pollution in the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic provided the unintended experiment of reduced on-road emissions' impacts on air pollution due to lockdowns across the United States. Studies have quantified on-road transportation's impact on fine particulate matter (PM_2.5)-attributable and ozone (O₃)-attributable adverse health outcomes in the United States, and other studies have quantified air pollution-attributable health outcome reductions due to COVID-19-related lockdowns. We aim to quantify the PM_2.5-attributable, O₃-attributable, and nitrogen dioxide (NO₂)-attributable adverse health outcomes from traffic emissions as well as the air pollution benefits due to reduced on-road activity during the pandemic in 2020. We estimate 79,400 (95% CI 46,100-121,000) premature mortalities each year due to on-road-attributable PM_2.5, O₃, and NO₂. We further break down the impacts by pollutant and vehicle types (passenger [PAS] vs. freight [FRT] vehicles). We estimate PAS vehicles to be responsible for 63% of total impacts and FRT vehicles 37%. Nitrogen oxide (NO_X) emissions from these vehicles are responsible for 78% of total impacts as it is a precursor for PM_2.5 and O₃. Utilizing annual vehicle miles traveled reductions in 2020, we estimate that 9,300 (5,500-14,000) deaths from air pollution were avoided in 2020 due to the state-specific reductions in on-road activity across the continental United States. By quantifying the air pollution public health benefits from lockdown-related reductions in on-road emissions, the results from this study stress the need for continued emission mitigation policies, like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) recently proposed NO_X standards for heavy-duty vehicles, to mitigate on-road transportation's public health impact.

SUBMITTER: Arter CA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10825624 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Air pollution benefits from reduced on-road activity due to COVID-19 in the United States.

Arter Calvin A CA Buonocore Jonathan J JJ Isakov Vlad V Pandey Gavendra G Arunachalam Saravanan S

PNAS nexus 20240117 1

On-road transportation is one of the largest contributors to air pollution in the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic provided the unintended experiment of reduced on-road emissions' impacts on air pollution due to lockdowns across the United States. Studies have quantified on-road transportation's impact on fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>)-attributable and ozone (O<sub>3</sub>)-attributable adverse health outcomes in the United States, and other studies have quantified air pollution- ...[more]

PMID: 38292536

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAutomobile exhaust contains precursors to ozone and fine particulate matter (PM ≤ 2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter; PM2.5), posing health risks. Dependency on car commuting also reduces physical fitness opportunities.ObjectiveIn this study we sought to quantify benefits from reducing automobile usage for short urban and suburban trips.MethodsWe simulated census-tract level changes in hourly pollutant concentrations from the elimination of automobile round trips ≤ 8 km in 11 metropolitan areas in the upper midwestern United States using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. Next, we estimated annual changes in health outcomes and monetary costs expected from pollution changes using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Benefits Mapping Analysis Program (BenMAP). In addition, we used the World Health Organization Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) to calculate benefits of increased physical activity if 50% of short trips were made by bicycle.ResultsWe estimate that, by eliminating these short automobile trips, annual average urban PM2.5 would decline by 0.1 µg/m3 and that summer ozone (O3) would increase slightly in cities but decline regionally, resulting in net health benefits of $4.94 billion/year [95% confidence interval (CI): $0.2 billion, $13.5 billion), with 25% of PM2.5 and most O3 benefits to populations outside metropolitan areas. Across the study region of approximately 31.3 million people and 37,000 total square miles, mortality would decline by approximately 1,295 deaths/year (95% CI: 912, 1,636) because of improved air quality and increased exercise. Making 50% of short trips by bicycle would yield savings of approximately $3.8 billion/year from avoided mortality and reduced health care costs (95% CI: $2.7 billion, $5.0 billion]. We estimate that the combined benefits of improved air quality and physical fitness would exceed $8 billion/year.ConclusionOur findings suggest that significant health and economic benefits are possible if bicycling replaces short car trips. Less dependence on automobiles in urban areas would also improve health in downwind rural settings.

Project description:We developed spatially detailed source-impact estimates of population health burden measures of air pollution for the United States and Canada by quantifying sources-receptor relationships using the benefit-per-ton (BPT1) metric. We calculated BPTs as the valuations of premature mortality counts due to fine particulate matter (PM2.5; particulate matter ≤2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter) exposure resulting from emissions of one ton of a given pollutant. Our BPT estimates, while accounting for a large portion of societal impact, do not include morbidity, acute exposure mortality, or chronic exposure mortality due to exposure to other pollutants such as ozone.The adjoint version of a widely used chemical transport model (CTM) allowed us to calculate location-specific BPTs at a high level of granularity for source-impact characterization. Location-specific BPTs provides a means for exploiting the disparities in source impact of emissions at different locations. For instance, estimated BPTs show that 20% of primary PM2.5 and ammonia emissions in the United States account for approximately 50% and 60% of the burden of each species, respectively, for an estimated burden of $370B USD. Similarly, 10% of the most harmful emissions of primary PM2.5 and ammonia emissions in Canada account for approximately 60% and 50% of their burden, respectively. By delineating differences and disparities in source impacts, adjoint-based BPT provides a direct means for prioritizing and targeting emissions that are most damaging.Sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of our assumptions and study design on the estimated BPTs. The choice of concentration-response function had a substantial impact on the estimated BPTs and is likely to constitute the largest source of uncertainty in those estimates. Our method for constructing annual BPT estimates based on episodic simulations introduces low uncertainty, while uncertainties associated with the spatial resolution of the CTM were evaluated to be of medium importance. Finally, while recognizing that the use of BPTs entails an implied assumption of linearity, we show that BPTs for primary PM2.5 emissions are stable across different emission levels in North America. While BPTs for precursors of secondary inorganic aerosols showed sensitivity to emission levels in the past, we found that those have stabilized with lower emissions and pollutant concentrations in the North American atmosphere.We used BPTs to provide location-specific and sectoral estimates for the cobenefits of reducing carbon dioxide emissions from a range of combustion sources. Cobenefit estimates rely heavily on the emission characteristics of the sector and therefore exhibit more pronounced sectoral fingerprints than do BPTs. We provide cobenefit estimates for various subsectors of on-road transportation, thermal electricity generation, and off-road engines. Off-road engines and various heavy-duty diesel vehicles had the largest cobenefits, which in most urban locations far exceeded estimates of the social cost of carbon. Based on our cobenefit estimations, we also provide per-vehicle burden estimates for different vintages of vehicle subsectors such as transit buses and short-haul trucks in major US cities.

Project description:Traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) refers to the wide range of air pollutants emitted by traffic that are dispersed into the ambient air. Emerging evidence shows that TRAP can increase asthma incidence in children. Living with asthma can carry a huge financial burden for individuals and families due to direct and indirect medical expenses, which can include costs of hospitalization, medical visits, medication, missed school days, and loss of wages from missed workdays for caregivers. The objective of this paper is to estimate the economic impact of childhood asthma incident cases attributable to nitrogen dioxide (NO2), a common traffic-related air pollutant in urban areas, in the United States at the state level. We calculate the direct and indirect costs of childhood asthma incident cases attributable to NO2 using previously published burden of disease estimates and per person asthma cost estimates. By multiplying the per person indirect and direct costs for each state with the NO2-attributable asthma incident cases in each state, we were able to estimate the total cost of childhood asthma cases attributable to NO2 in the United States. The cost calculation estimates the total direct and indirect annual cost of childhood asthma cases attributable to NO2 in the year 2010 to be $178,900,138.989 (95% CI: $101,019,728.20-$256,980,126.65). The state with the highest cost burden is California with $24,501,859.84 (95% CI: $10,020,182.62-$38,982,261.250), and the state with the lowest cost burden is Montana with $88,880.12 (95% CI: $33,491.06-$144,269.18). This study estimates the annual costs of childhood asthma incident cases attributable to NO2 and demonstrates the importance of conducting economic impacts studies of TRAP. It is important for policy-making institutions to focus on this problem by advocating and supporting more studies on TRAP's impact on the national economy and health, including these economic impact estimates in the decision-making process, and devising mitigation strategies to reduce TRAP and the population's exposure.

Project description:The novel human coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has claimed more than 240,000 lives worldwide, causing tremendous public health, social, and economic damages. While the risk factors of COVID-19 are still under investigation, environmental factors, such as urban air pollution, may play an important role in increasing population susceptibility to COVID-19 pathogenesis. We conducted a cross-sectional nationwide study using zero-inflated negative binomial models to estimate the association between long-term (2010-2016) county-level exposures to NO2, PM2.5 and O3 and county-level COVID-19 case-fatality and mortality rates in the US. We used both single and multipollutant models and controlled for spatial trends and a comprehensive set of potential confounders, including state-level test positive rate, county-level healthcare capacity, phase-of-epidemic, population mobility, sociodemographic, socioeconomic status, behavior risk factors, and meteorological factors. 1,027,799 COVID-19 cases and 58,489 deaths were reported in 3,122 US counties from January 22, 2020 to April 29, 2020, with an overall observed case-fatality rate of 5.8%. Spatial variations were observed for both COVID-19 death outcomes and long-term ambient air pollutant levels. County-level average NO2 concentrations were positively associated with both COVID-19 case-fatality rate and mortality rate in single-, bi-, and tri-pollutant models (p-values<0.05). Per inter-quartile range (IQR) increase in NO2 (4.6 ppb), COVID-19 case-fatality rate and mortality rate were associated with an increase of 7.1% (95% CI 1.2% to 13.4%) and 11.2% (95% CI 3.4% to 19.5%), respectively. We did not observe significant associations between long-term exposures to PM2.5 or O3 and COVID-19 death outcomes (p-values>0.05), although per IQR increase in PM2.5 (3.4 ug/m3) was marginally associated with 10.8% (95% CI: -1.1% to 24.1%) increase in COVID-19 mortality rate. Long-term exposure to NO2, which largely arises from urban combustion sources such as traffic, may enhance susceptibility to severe COVID-19 outcomes, independent of long-term PM2.5 and O3 exposure. The results support targeted public health actions to protect residents from COVID-19 in heavily polluted regions with historically high NO2 levels. Moreover, continuation of current efforts to lower traffic emissions and ambient air pollution levels may be an important component of reducing population-level risk of COVID-19 deaths.

Project description:BackgroundThe novel human coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has claimed more than 600,000 lives worldwide, causing tremendous public health, social, and economic damages. Although the risk factors of COVID-19 are still under investigation, environmental factors, such as urban air pollution, may play an important role in increasing population susceptibility to COVID-19 pathogenesis.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional nationwide study using zero-inflated negative binomial models to estimate the association between long-term (2010-2016) county-level exposures to NO2, PM2.5, and O3 and county-level COVID-19 case-fatality and mortality rates in the United States. We used both single- and multi-pollutant models and controlled for spatial trends and a comprehensive set of potential confounders, including state-level test positive rate, county-level health care capacity, phase of epidemic, population mobility, population density, sociodemographics, socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity, behavioral risk factors, and meteorology.ResultsFrom January 22, 2020, to July 17, 2020, 3,659,828 COVID-19 cases and 138,552 deaths were reported in 3,076 US counties, with an overall observed case-fatality rate of 3.8%. County-level average NO2 concentrations were positively associated with both COVID-19 case-fatality rate and mortality rate in single-, bi-, and tri-pollutant models. When adjusted for co-pollutants, per interquartile-range (IQR) increase in NO2 (4.6 ppb), COVID-19 case-fatality rate and mortality rate were associated with an increase of 11.3% (95% CI 4.9%-18.2%) and 16.2% (95% CI 8.7%-24.0%), respectively. We did not observe significant associations between COVID-19 case-fatality rate and long-term exposure to PM2.5 or O3, although per IQR increase in PM2.5 (2.6 μg/m3) was marginally associated, with a 14.9% (95% CI 0.0%-31.9%) increase in COVID-19 mortality rate when adjusted for co-pollutants.DiscussionLong-term exposure to NO2, which largely arises from urban combustion sources such as traffic, may enhance susceptibility to severe COVID-19 outcomes, independent of long-term PM2.5 and O3 exposure. The results support targeted public health actions to protect residents from COVID-19 in heavily polluted regions with historically high NO2 levels. Continuation of current efforts to lower traffic emissions and ambient air pollution may be an important component of reducing population-level risk of COVID-19 case fatality and mortality.

Dataset Information

Air pollution benefits from reduced on-road activity due to COVID-19 in the United States.

Publications

Air pollution benefits from reduced on-road activity due to COVID-19 in the United States.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets