Erratum to 'Adductor Canal Block vs Liposomal Bupivacaine Periarticular Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial' [Arthroplasty Today 9 (2021) 21-28].
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Than J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10830503 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Erratum to 'Adductor Canal Block vs Liposomal Bupivacaine Periarticular Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial' [Arthroplasty Today 9 (2021) 21-28].
Than Justin J Westlake Babe B Kim Jun J Pipitone Olivia O Ryan James J
Arthroplasty today 20240122
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.03.008.]. ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThis study compares postoperative pain scores and functional outcomes between liposomal bupivacaine peri-articular injection (LB-PAI) vs a single-shot adductor canal block (ACB) using bupivacaine HCl in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsThis is a randomized controlled trial of 56 patients who were treated with TKA for arthritis. Patients were randomized to receive an intraoperative LB-PAI (n = 27) or preoperative ACB using bupivacaine HCl (n = 29). Both groups were otherwise given our institutional standard multimodal pain protocol. Data on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, knee range of motion, postoperative ambulation distance, hospital length of stay, and opioid use were collected. The total cost of each intervention was compared at the conclusion of the study.ResultsAge, gender, or body mass index was similar between groups. Compared to the ACB group, the LB-PAI group trended to lower average VAS pain scores on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2 (average difference [95% confidence interval] = -0.5 [-0.7, 1.7], -1.0 [-0.1, 2.0], -0.2 [-0.8, 1.3]), and identical average VAS pain scores on postoperative days 4 and 7. These differences and all postoperative outcome measures were not statistically significant at any time point. A single 266-milligram vial of liposomal bupivacaine costs $351, and a single-shot ACB costs $893 at our institution.ConclusionsThis randomized controlled trial shows similar postoperative pain control, functional outcomes, and opioid use between LB-PAI and a single-shot ACB in patients undergoing primary TKA. However, the single-shot ACB costs $542 more than the LB-PAI at our institution.
| S-EPMC8088990 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of a periarticular injection using liposomal bupivacaine could decrease pain and improve outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Fifty consecutive patients received no periarticular injections (group A). Another 50 consecutive patients received a periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine (group B). There were no differences in the groups with respect to gender, age, body mass index (BMI), or comorbidities. There was a significant reduction in the amount of narcotics used in the liposomal bupivacaine group (60.97-mg oral morphine equivalent vs 89.74 mg, P = 0.009). Patients in group B with a BMI <40 and a Charlson comorbidity index of 0-3 had decreased length of stay (2.64 vs 3.06 days, P = .004), narcotic use over 24-48 hours (110.66 vs 182.47 mg, P = .013), and narcotic use over 48-72 hours (49.61 vs. 112.65 mg, P = .004). In patients with a BMI <40 and comorbidity index of ≤3, periarticular injection using liposomal bupivacaine leads to earlier discharge along with decreased use of narcotics.
| S-EPMC4958110 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPain management for bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) often combines adductor canal block (ACB) with periarticular infiltration (PAI). However, concerns arise regarding local anesthetic toxicity. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of different bupivacaine concentrations in simultaneous BTKA.MethodsPatients undergoing simultaneous BTKA under spinal anesthesia were included in the study. They received ACB with 50 mg bupivacaine for each thigh. The patients were then randomized into two groups. Group A was administered a PAI of 100 mg bupivacaine per knee (totaling 300 mg bupivacaine for ACB and PAI). Group B received a PAI with 50 mg bupivacaine per knee (totaling 200 mg bupivacaine for ACB and PAI). Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale at 4-h intervals for 48 h after surgery. Plasma bupivacaine concentrations were measured at eight specified times. Postsurgery walking ability was also evaluated.ResultsAmong the 57 participants analyzed, visual analog scale pain scores revealed no significant differences between the two groups. An interim analysis of plasma bupivacaine concentrations in both groups indicated no significant disparities. In group B, 93.1% managed to walk with assistance within 48 h, as opposed to group A's 71.4% (P = 0.041).ConclusionsCombining ACB with 100 mg bupivacaine and PAI with another 100 mg bupivacaine provided effective pain relief. This combination also had a better safety profile and led to more patients walking postsurgery than when combining ACB with 100 mg bupivacaine and PAI with 200 mg bupivacaine. Thus, ACB combined with PAI with a total dose of 200 mg bupivacaine appears suitable for simultaneous BTKA.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03249662).
| S-EPMC10799479 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a commonly performed procedure to alleviate pain and improve functional limitations caused by end-stage joint damage. Effective management of postoperative pain following TKA is crucial to the prevention of complications and enhancement of recovery. Adductor canal blocks (ACB) with conventional bupivacaine (CB) provide adequate analgesia after TKA, but carry a risk of rebound pain following block resolution. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is an extended-release local anesthetic that can provide up to 72 h of pain relief. The objective of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes between ACBs using LB and CB after TKA.MethodsThis single institution, prospective, randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients scheduled for TKA. Participants were randomized to receive ACB with either LB or CB. Pain scores up to 72 h postoperatively were assessed as the primary outcome. Opioid consumption and length of stay were evaluated as secondary outcomes.ResultsA total of 80 patients were enrolled. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. LB group showed significantly lower cumulative opioid use during the 72 h evaluated (P = 0.016). There were no differences in pain scores or length of stay between the groups.ConclusionThe study demonstrated that LB ACBs led to significantly lower opioid consumption in the days following TKA without affecting pain scores or length of stay. This finding has important implications for improving postoperative outcomes and reducing opioid use in TKA patients. Previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the benefits of LB, highlighting the need for further research.Trial registrationThis project was retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT05635916 ) on 2 December 2022.
| S-EPMC10832097 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) report low satisfaction with postoperative pain control. The purpose of this study is to examine if there is a difference in post-operative pain for TKA patients without femoral nerve block receiving an intra-operative pericapsular injection of bupivacaine liposome suspension (EXPAREL; Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California) versus a concentrated multi drug cocktail. Seventy TKA patients were randomly assigned to either the bupivacaine liposome or the multi-drug cocktail. Post-operative pain scores, morphine sulfate equivalence consumption values, adverse events, and overall pain control satisfaction scores were collected. Patients reported significantly higher pain level for the cocktail group on post-op day 1 (p < .05) and post-op day 2 (p < .01) versus the bupivacaine liposome group. This same trend was found for morphine sulfate equivalence consumption in the PACU (p < .01) and post-op day 2 (p < .01). Higher satisfaction in pain control (p < .001) and overall experience (p < .01) was also found in the bupivacaine liposome group. Finally, significantly more adverse events were found in the multi-drug group versus the bupivacaine liposome group (p < .05). The study findings demonstrated a non-inferior difference, albeit not a clinically significant difference, in patient-perceived pain scores, morphine sulfate equivalence consumption, adverse events, and overall satisfaction.
| S-EPMC4957154 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAdductor canal blocks (ACBs), typically administered with a local anesthetic such as bupivacaine, help control perioperative pain after total knee arthroplasty. Recently, liposomal bupivacaine (LB) was introduced in an attempt to extend the duration of analgesia, used primarily in periarticular injections (PAIs). The purpose of this study was to compare pain control and early perioperative outcomes with ACB using LB vs standard bupivacaine (SB).MethodsWe retrospectively compared pain control in a group of 75 patients with ACB and PAI with SB to that of a cohort of 75 patients who received ACB and PAI with LB. The primary outcome measure was pain measured using the visual analog score. The secondary outcome measures were morphine equivalents of pain medication (ME), physical therapy distance ambulated, disposition status, and length of stay.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two cohorts for age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, or American Society of Anesthesiologists. Visual analog scores were significantly lower in the LB group for postoperative day (POD) 0 (2.1 vs 2.8, P = .046), POD 1 (2.2 vs 3.3, P < .001), and POD 2 (2.1 vs 3.7, P = .001) than those in the SB group. The LB group consumed significantly fewer ME on the POD 0 (18.7 vs 25.2, P = .02) and POD 1 (23.4 vs 37.8, P = .003), as well as overall ME/day (24.6 vs 41.7, P < .001). The LB group walked more on POD 0 (261.6 vs 108.2, P < .001) and POD 1 (761.5 vs 372.0, P < .001).ConclusionsWe report improved outcomes across all measures for the LB group. There were no adverse events. This study supports the use of LB for ACBs in total knee arthroplasty.
| S-EPMC6728435 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Adductor canal block (ACB) is one of the preferred methods of analgesia in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, conventionally its use is time-consuming, requires ultrasound guidance, a trained anaesthesia team and adherence to strict asepsis by members of the allied teams. This study was done to assess the feasibility and safety of direct adductor canal block (DACB) as a part of surgeon-administered periarticular infiltration. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Thirty computed tomography (CT) angiography films of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. The trajectory of the needle placement for a DACB in relation to the target region of the adductor block was determined. Fourteen knees in seven cadavers, were dissected through a medial parapatellar approach to perform TKA. After administering the DACB using the technique based on CT data, dissection was carried out to ascertain the correct placement of the dye by visualising the stained areas. RESULTS:The angle of approach in the coronal plane from the entry point to the medial high point and to the adductor hiatus was 10.2° (8-14°) and 6° (3.8-11°), respectively. The angle of approach in the sagittal plane from the entry point to the medial high point and to the adductor hiatus was 7° (5-10.5°) and 29° (19-43°), respectively. In all the 14 cadaveric knees, we confirmed the correct placement of the methylene blue dye as demonstrated by the staining of the adductor canal. CONCLUSION:The study demonstrates the feasibility of the DACB. This surgeon-driven technique is likely to reduce the cost of the procedure, reduce operating room time and also eliminate the risks of surgical-site contamination.
| S-EPMC7507271 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe use of multimodal pain regimens has been shown to be an effective technique for the treatment of postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty. Periarticular injections, of both short-acting and long-acting anesthetics, have emerged as an additional method of providing significant improvement in postoperative pain relief. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of periarticular injection using long-acting vs short-acting preparations.MethodsA randomized, prospective study of 80 consecutive patients was performed comparing liposomal bupivacaine vs plain bupivacaine periarticular injection. The primary outcomes included pain relief, total narcotic usage, and completion of physical therapy goals, specifically range of motion.ResultsNo significant improvements were noted between liposomal bupivacaine and plain bupivacaine injection groups in overall pain reduction, range of motion, or total narcotic usage. At 24 hours, small statistically significant differences in physical therapy pain scores were noted with liposomal bupivacaine vs plain bupivacaine and control patients, but these differences did not persist at later time points. Both preparations demonstrated statistically significant improvements in range of motion when compared to historical controls, but no differences were noted between preparations.ConclusionOverall, minimal significant differences were noted between liposomal bupivacaine and plain bupivacaine at early and late time points. Both preparations of periarticular injection demonstrated superiority over control pain regimens but were relatively equivalent to one another in direct comparison.
| S-EPMC6054911 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIntraoperative periarticular injection (PAI) with local anesthetic is an important component of multimodal pain control in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). A potential risk of this practice is serum anesthetic toxicity resulting from the autotransfusion of blood collected from a reinfusion drain. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the levels of bupivacaine in blood collected in an autotransfusion system after use of a PAI in TJA.MethodsIn this prospective study, each TJA patient had an identical PAI consisting of 20 cc of liposomal bupivacaine, 30 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine, and 10 cc of normal saline. An autologous reinfusion drain was utilized in all patients. At 2 and 5 hours postoperatively, blood was collected from the autotransfusion canister and sent to the laboratory to quantify bupivacaine levels. The sums of these levels were compared to the lowest reported serum bupivacaine dose associated with toxicity (1.1 mg/kg).ResultsEleven unilateral TJA patients were enrolled (6 total knee arthroplasties, 5 total hip arthroplasties). The average 2-hour serum bupivacaine level was 2.9 μg (range 0.8-5.6) while the average 5-hour serum bupivacaine level was 4.5 μg (range 0.4-10.0). The average sum of the 2-hour and 5-hour serum bupivacaine level was 5.6 μg (range 0.8-13.6). Each of the 11 patient samples were well below their minimum serum bupivacaine dose toxicity.ConclusionsUse of a reinfusion drain after PAI with liposomal bupivacaine in TJA appears safe, as bupivacaine levels in the autotransfused blood remains well below the reported minimum serum toxic dose.Level of evidenceIV.
| S-EPMC5994563 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPeriarticular anesthesia (PAI) with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) were 2 common type of pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is no consensus about PAI with LB shows better clinical outcome than FNB. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of PAI with LB and FNB for patients prepared for TKA.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs from PubMed (1966-2017.2), EMBASE (1980-2017.2), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2017.2), Web of Science (1966-2017.2), and Chinese Wanfang database (1980-2017.2) were searched. Continuous outcomes including visual analogue scale (VAS) at 24, 48, and 72 hours, total morphine consumption, length of hospital, and range of motion (ROM) were reported as the weighted mean difference with 95% and confidence interval (CI) and discontinuous outcomes (the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV]) were presented as relative risk with 95% CI. Random-effects model was adopted to analyze the relevant data.ResultsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 studies with 2407 patients were eligible and finally included in this meta-analysis (LB = 1114, FNB = 1293). There was no significant difference between VAS at 24, 4, and 72 hours, ROM, and the occurrence of PONV between PAI with LB group versus FNB group (P > 0.05). Compared with the FNB group, PAI with LB was associated with a significant decrease in length of hospital stay by 0.43 day (MD = -0.43; 95% CI -0.60 to -0.27; P = 0.001) and the total dose of total morphine consumption by (MD = -29.32; 95% CI -57.55 to -1.09; P = 0.042).ConclusionsThe review of trials found that PAI with LB provided a significant beneficial effect over FNB in improving the pain or decreased the total morphine consumption in patients who underwent TKA. However, PAI with LB associated with less LOS than FNB. More high quality RCTs are still needed to identify the effects and optimal dose of LB for pain management after TKA.
| S-EPMC5380264 | biostudies-literature