Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Results
After excluding 4 patients with an anesthesia duration of < 2 hours, data from 34 patients (1163 sets of tracheal and esophageal temperatures) were analyzed. Concordance correlation coefficient was 0.78. The overall mean bias (95% limits of agreement) between the tracheal and esophageal temperatures was -0.16°C (-0.65°C to 0.34°C). The percentage of temperature differences within ± 0.25°C was 73.5% ± 32.3, with a median of 89.4% [0,100]. The linear mixed-effects model revealed that the estimated intercept was 0.17°C with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.13°C to 0.22°C. The duration of anesthesia and the number of temperature measurements were associated with higher concordance between the tracheal and esophageal temperatures in univariate analysis.
SUBMITTER: Yoon JU
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10843427 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Yoon Ji-Uk JU Byeon Gyeong-Jo GJ Kim Hee Young HY Kim Hye-Jin HJ Yoo Yeong Min YM Bae Jaesang J Lee Jimin J
Medicine 20240201 5
<h4>Results</h4>After excluding 4 patients with an anesthesia duration of < 2 hours, data from 34 patients (1163 sets of tracheal and esophageal temperatures) were analyzed. Concordance correlation coefficient was 0.78. The overall mean bias (95% limits of agreement) between the tracheal and esophageal temperatures was -0.16°C (-0.65°C to 0.34°C). The percentage of temperature differences within ± 0.25°C was 73.5% ± 32.3, with a median of 89.4% [0,100]. The linear mixed-effects model revealed th ...[more]