Clinical and diagnostic values of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for infection in hematology patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Chen Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10848439 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in sepsis and bloodstream infection (BSI). Methods A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with sepsis and BSI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2020 to February 2022 was conducted. All the patients underwent blood culture and were divided into mNGS group and non-mNGS group according to whether mNGS was performed or not. The mNGS group was further divided into early group (< 1 day), intermediate group (1–3 days), and late group (> 3 days) according to the time of mNGS inspection. Results In 194 patients with sepsis and BSI, the positive rate of mNGS for identifying pathogens was significantly higher than that of blood culture (77.7% vs. 47.9%), and the detection period was shorter (1.41 ± 1.01 days vs. 4.82 ± 0.73 days); the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The 28-day mortality rate of the mNGS group (n = 112) was significantly lower than that of the non-mNGS group (n = 82) (47.32% vs. 62.20%, p = 0.043). The total hospitalization time for the mNGS group was longer than that for the non-mNGS group (18 (9, 33) days vs. 13 (6, 23) days, p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the ICU hospitalization time, mechanical ventilation time, vasoactive drug use time, and 90-day mortality between the two groups (p > 0.05). Sub-group analysis of patients in the mNGS group showed that the total hospitalization time and the ICU hospitalization time in the late group were longer than those in the early group (30 (18, 43) days vs. 10 (6, 26) days, 17 (6, 31) days vs. 6 (2, 10) days), and the ICU hospitalization time in the intermediate group was longer than that in the early group (6 (3, 15) days vs. 6 (2, 10) days); the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The 28-day mortality rate of the early group was higher than that of the late group (70.21% vs. 30.00%), and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Conclusions mNGS has the advantages of a short detection period and a high positive rate in the diagnosis of pathogens causing BSI and, eventually, sepsis. Routine blood culture combined with mNGS can significantly reduce the mortality of septic patients with BSI. Early detection using mNGS can shorten the total hospitalization time and the ICU hospitalization time of patients with sepsis and BSI.
| S-EPMC9950395 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundClinical values of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in patients with severe pneumonia remain controversial. Therefore, we conduct this meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of mNGS for pathogen detection and its role in the prognosis of severe pneumonia.MethodsWe systematically searched the literature published in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and CBM from the inception to the 28th September 2022. Relevant trials comparing mNGS with conventional methods applied to patients with severe pneumonia were included. The primary outcomes of this study were the pathogen-positive rate, the 28-day mortality, and the 90-day mortality; secondary outcomes included the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of hospital stay, and the length of stay in the ICU.ResultsTotally, 24 publications with 3220 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study. Compared with conventional methods (45.78%, 705/1540), mNGS (80.48%, 1233/1532) significantly increased the positive rate of pathogen detection [OR = 6.81, 95% CI (4.59, 10.11, P < 0.001]. The pooled 28-day and 90-day mortality in mNGS group were 15.08% (38/252) and 22.36% (36/161), respectively, which were significantly lower than those in conventional methods group 33.05% (117/354) [OR = 0.35, 95% CI (0.23, 0.55), P < 0.001, I2 = 0%] and 43.43%(109/251) [OR = 0.34, 95% CI (0.21, 0.54), P < 0.001]. Meanwhile, adjusted treatment based on the results of mNGS shortened the length of hospital stay [MD = -2.76, 95% CI (- 3.56, - 1.96), P < 0.001] and the length of stay in ICU [MD = -4.11, 95% CI (- 5.35, - 2.87), P < 0.001].ConclusionThe pathogen detection positive rate of mNGS was much higher than that of conventional methods. Adjusted treatment based on mNGS results can reduce the 28-day and 90-day mortality of patients with severe pneumonia, and shorten the length of hospital and ICU stay. Therefore, mNGS advised to be applied to severe pneumonia patients as early as possible in addition to conventional methods to improve the prognosis and reduce the length of hospital stay.
| S-EPMC10117876 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundA new pathogen detection tool, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), has been widely used for infection diagnosis, but the clinical and diagnostic value of mNGS in urinary tract infection (UTI) remains inconclusive. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy of mNGS in treating UTIs.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, and eligible studies were selected based on the predetermined criteria. The quality of the included studies was assessed via the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool, and the certainty of evidence (CoE) was measured by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) score. Then, the positive detection rate (PDR), pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was estimated in Review Manager, Stata, and MetaDisc. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis were performed to reveal the potential factors that influence internal heterogeneity.ResultsA total of 17 studies were selected for further analysis. The PDR of mNGS was markedly greater than that of culture (odds ratio (OR) = 2.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.72-4.81, p < 0.001, I2 = 90%). The GRADE score presented a very low CoE. Then, the pooled sensitivity was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91, I2 = 39.65%, p = 0.06), and the pooled specificity was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.51-0.90, I2 = 88.64%, p < 0.001). The AUROC of the studies analyzed was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92). The GRADE score indicated a low CoE.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that mNGS has favorable diagnostic performance for UTIs. More high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are expected to verify these findings and provide more information about mNGS in UTI treatment and prognosis.
| S-EPMC11412013 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Many common pathogens are difficult or impossible to detect using conventional microbiological tests. However, the rapid and untargeted nature of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) appears to be a promising alternative. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of mNGS in patients with infectious diseases. An electronic literature search of Embase, PubMed and Scopus databases was performed. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated; A random-effects model was used in cases of heterogeneity. A total of 20 papers were eligible for inclusion and synthesis. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic mNGS were 75% and 68%, respectively. The AUC from the SROC was 85%, corresponding to excellent performance. mNGS demonstrated satisfactory diagnostic performance for infections and yielded an overall detection rate superior to conventional methods.
| S-EPMC9723114 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMetagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is emerging as a promising technique for pathogens detection. However, reports on the application of mNGS in mixed pulmonary infection remain scarce.MethodsFrom July 2018 to March 2019, 55 cases were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. Cases were classified into mixed pulmonary infection (36 [65.5%]) and non-mixed pulmonary infection (19 [34.5%]) according to primary diagnoses. The performances of mNGS and conventional test on mixed pulmonary infection diagnosis and pathogen identification were compared.ResultsThe sensitivity of mNGS in mixed pulmonary infection diagnosis was much higher than that of conventional test (97.2% vs 13.9%; P < 0.01), but the specificity was the opposite (63.2% vs 94.7%; P = 0.07). The positive predictive value of mNGS was 83.3% (95% CI, 68.0-92.5%), and the negative predictive value was 92.3% (95% CI, 62.1-99.6%). A total of 5 (9.1%) cases were identified as mixed pulmonary infection by both conventional tests and mNGS, however, the pathogens identification results were consistent between these two methods in only 1 (1.8%) case. In summary, the pathogens detected by mNGS in 3 (5.5%) cases were consistent with those by conventional test, and only 1 (1.8%) case was mixed pulmonary infection. According to our data, mNGS had a broader spectrum for pathogen detection than conventional tests. In particular, application of mNGS improved the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections. Within the 55 cases, mNGS detected and identified fungi in 31 (56.4%) cases, of which only 10 (18.2%) cases were positive for the same fungi by conventional test. The most common pathogen detected by mNGS was Human cytomegalovirus in our study, which was identified in 19 (34.5%) cases of mixed pulmonary infection. Human cytomegalovirus and Pneumocystis jirovecii, which were detected in 7 (12.7%) cases, were the most common co-pathogens in the group of mixed pulmonary infection.ConclusionsmNGS is a promising technique to detect co-pathogens in mixed pulmonary infection, with potential benefits in speed and sensitivity.Trial registration(retrospectively registered): ChiCTR1900023727. Registrated 9 JUNE 2019.
| S-EPMC6921575 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMore than 100 different pathogens can cause encephalitis. Testing of all the neurological pathogens by conventional methods can be difficult. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (NGS) could identify the infectious agents in a target-independent manner. The role of this novel method in clinical diagnostic microbiology still needs to be evaluated. In present study, we used metagenomic NGS to search for an infectious etiology in a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patient with lethally diffuse brain lesions. Sequences mapping to Toxoplasma gondii were unexpectedly detected.Case presentationA 31-year-old HIV-infected patient presented to hospital in a critical ill condition with a Glasgow coma scale score of 3. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed diffuse brain abnormalities with contrast enhancement. Metagenomic NGS was performed on DNA extract from 300 μL patient's cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with the BGISEQ-50 platform. The sequencing detection identified 65,357 sequence reads uniquely aligned to the Toxoplasma gondii genome. Presence of Toxoplasma gondii genome in CSF was further verified by Toxoplasma gondii-specific polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Altogether, those results confirmed the diagnosis of toxoplasmic encephalitis.ConclusionsThis study suggests that metagenomic NGS may be a useful diagnostic tool for toxoplasmic encephalitis. As metagenomic NGS is able to identify all pathogens in a single run, it may be a promising strategy to explore the clinical causative pathogens in central nervous system infections with atypical features.
| S-EPMC6305995 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) vs. conventional culture methods (CM) in chronic infection and acute infection.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of 88 patients with acute infection and 105 patients with chronic infection admitted to three hospitals from 2017 to 2022.ResultsThe results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS were higher than those of CM. The number of patients who changed the antibiotic treatment in the mNGS positive group was larger than that of patients in the mNGS negative group in both the acute infection group (60.5 vs. 28.0%, P = 0.0022) and chronic infection group (46.2 vs. 22.6%, P = 0.01112). High levels of temperature (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.18-3.70, P: 0.015), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR: 15, 95% CI: 2.74-280.69, P: 0.011), neutrophil count (OR: 3.09, 95% CI: 1.19-8.43, P: 0.023), and low levels of lymphocyte count (OR: 3.43, 95% CI:1.26-10.21, P: 0.020) may lead to positive mNGS results in the acute infection group while no significant factor was identified to predict positive results in the chronic infection group.ConclusionmNGS could provide useful guidance on antibiotic strategies in infectious diseases and may be more valuable for the diagnosis and treatment of acute infection vs. chronic infection.
| S-EPMC10864100 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionMetagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel technique for detecting pathogens. This retrospective study evaluated the diagnostic value of mNGS using plasma for infections in hematology patients and its impact on clinical treatment and prognosis in different subgroups of hematology patients.MethodsA total of 153 hematology patients with suspected infection who underwent mNGS using plasma were enrolled in the study. Their clinical histories, conventional microbiological test (CMT) results, mNGS results, treatment and prognosis were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsIn 153 plasma samples, mNGS yielded a higher positivity rate than CMT (total: 88.24% vs. 40.52%, P<0.001; bacteria: 35.95% vs. 21.57%, P < 0.01; virus: 69.93% vs. 21.57%, P<0.001; fungi: 20.26% vs. 7.84%, P<0.01). mNGS had a higher positivity rate for bacteria and fungi in the neutropenia group than in the non-neutropenia group (bacteria: 48.61% vs. 24.69%, P<0.01; fungi: 27.78% vs. 13.58%, P<0.05). mNGS demonstrated a greater advantage in the group of patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Both the 3-day and 7-day efficacy rates in the HSCT group were higher than those in the non-HSCT group (3-day: 82.22% vs. 58.65%, P < 0.01; 7-day: 88.89% vs. 67.31%, P < 0.01), and the 28-day mortality rate was lower in the HSCT group than in the non-HSCT group (6.67% vs. 38.89%, P < 0.000). The neutropenia group achieved similar efficacy and mortality rates to the non-neutropenia group (7-day efficiency rate: 76.39% vs. 71.43%, P > 0.05; mortality rate: 29.17% vs. 29.63%, P > 0.05) with more aggressive antibiotic adjustments (45.83% vs. 22.22%, P < 0.01).ConclusionmNGS can detect more microorganisms with higher positive rates, especially in patients with neutropenia. mNGS had better clinical value in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or neutropenia, which had a positive effect on treatment and prognosis.
| S-EPMC10869557 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has developed rapidly in the last decade and is emerging as a promising diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, its diagnostic value for PJI is still uncertain. This systematic review aimed to explore the diagnostic value of NGS for PJI and verify its accuracy for culture-negative PJI patients. We conducted this systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify diagnostic technique studies evaluating the accuracy of NGS in the diagnosis of PJI. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were estimated for each article. The detection rate of NGS for culture-negative PJI patients or PJI patients with antibiotic administration history was also calculated. Of the 87 identified citations, nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The diagnostic sensitivities and specificities of NGS ranged from 63% to 96% and 73% to 100%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values ranged from 71% to 100% and 74% to 95%, respectively. The detection rate of NGS for culture-negative PJI patients in six studies was higher than 50% (range from 82% to 100%), while in three studies it was lower than 50% (range from 9% to 31%). Also, the detection rate of NGS for PJIs with antibiotic administration history ranged from 74.05% to 92.31%. In conclusion, this systematic review suggests that NGS may have the potential to be a new tool for the diagnosis of PJI and should be considered to be added to the portfolio of diagnostic procedures. Furthermore, NGS showed a favorable diagnostic accuracy for culture-negative PJI patients or PJI patients with antibiotic administration history. However, due to the small sample sizes of studies and substantial heterogeneity among the included studies, more research is needed to confirm or disprove these findings.
| S-EPMC8867422 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionImmunosuppression predisposes allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients to infection. Prompt and accurate identification of pathogens is crucial to optimize treatment strategies. This multi-center retrospective study aimed to assess the ability of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to detect causative pathogens in febrile allo-HSCT recipients and examined its concordance with conventional microbiological tests (CMT).MethodsWe performed mNGS and CMT on samples obtained from 153 patients with suspected infection during allo-HSCT. Patients were grouped based on their neutropenic status at the time of sampling.ResultsThe mNGS test was more sensitive than CMT (81.1% vs. 53.6%, P<0.001) for diagnosing clinically suspected infection, especially in the non-neutropenia cohort. mNGS could detect fungi and viruses better than bacteria, with a higher sensitivity than CMT. Immune events were diagnosed in 57.4% (35/61) of the febrile events with negative mNGS results, and 33.5% (48/143) with negative CMT results (P=0.002). The treatment success rate of the targeted anti-infection strategy was significantly higher when based on mNGS than on empirical antibiotics (85% vs. 56.5%, P=0.004).ConclusionThe mNGS test is superior to CMT for identifying clinically relevant pathogens, and provides valuable information for anti-infection strategies in allo-HSCT recipients. Additionally, attention should be paid to immune events in patients with negative mNGS results.
| S-EPMC10533937 | biostudies-literature