Dataset Information

Acute effects of traditional and electronic cigarettes on palatal blood flow in smokers: A cross-over pilot study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Smoking is a significant health hazard and contributes to cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. It can increase postoperative complications during oral and maxillofacial surgery due to its topical effect on the oral mucosa. New alternatives to traditional tobacco products are gaining popularity, in particular, electronic cigarettes.

Objectives

This pilot study investigated the acute effects of nicotine-containing and nicotine-free electronic cigarettes on palatal blood flow (PBF), and compared their effects to traditional cigarettes.

Materials and methods

14 medically healthy volunteers (8 males, 6 females, age: 34.7 ± 7.0) were recruited for the study. All patients (N = 14) were requested to smoke nicotine-containing (ECN) and nicotine-free electronic cigarettes (EC0) and a mouthpiece (end of a traditional cigarette) as a control sham smoking blind test (BT). EC users did not smoke a traditional cigarette (TC), resulting in 10 people in the TC group. Palatal blood flow was measured by Laser Speckle Contrast Imager before, immediately after, and 15 min after the exposures. Exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) and carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) were measured before and immediately after smoking with a piCO+ Smokerlyzer machine.

Results

In all groups, no significant differences were observed in the changes of palatal blood flow between time points. Exhaled carbon monoxide and carboxyhemoglobin were significantly higher in the traditional cigarette (TC) group compared to the nicotine-containing electronic cigarette (ECN) and nicotine-free electronic cigarette (EC0) groups, both before and after the exposure (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Acute use of either traditional or electronic cigarettes may have minimal impact on palatal blood flow, but additional studies are required to clarify their impact on the mucosa.

SUBMITTER: Vamos O

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10850968 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar-Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Acute effects of traditional and electronic cigarettes on palatal blood flow in smokers: A cross-over pilot study.

Vámos Orsolya O Kulcsár Norbert N Mikecs Barbara B Kelemen Kata K Kaán Réka R Abafalvi Lilla L Dinya Elek E Vág János J Hermann Péter P Kispélyi Barbara B

Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research 20240205 2

<h4>Background</h4>Smoking is a significant health hazard and contributes to cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. It can increase postoperative complications during oral and maxillofacial surgery due to its topical effect on the oral mucosa. New alternatives to traditional tobacco products are gaining popularity, in particular, electronic cigarettes.<h4>Objectives</h4>This pilot study investigated the acute effects of nicotine-containing and nicotine-free electronic cigarettes on palatal blood ...[more]

PMID: 38333089

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThere is considerable debate about the benefits and risks of electronic cigarettes (ECs). To better understand the risk-benefit ratio of ECs, more information is needed about net nicotine consumption and toxicant exposure of cigarette smokers switching to ECs.MethodsForty cigarette smokers (≥1 year of smoking) interested in switching to ECs but not necessarily quitting smoking were enrolled in a 4-week observational study and provided an e-Go C non-variable battery and refillable atomizers and choice of eight flavors in 12 or 24 mg nicotine dosage. Measurement of urinary cotinine (metabolite of nicotine), 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL; a pulmonary carcinogen), and eight volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are toxic tobacco smoke constituents was conducted at baseline and week 4.ResultsAll participants with follow-up data (92.5%) reported using the study EC. Of the 40 smokers, 16 reported no cigarettes at week 2 (40%) and six continued to report no cigarettes at week 4 (15%). Change in nicotine intake over the 4 weeks was non-significant (p = .90). Carbon monoxide (p < .001), NNAL (p < .01) and metabolites of benzene (p < .01) and acrylonitrile (p = .001) were significantly decreased in the study sample. Smokers switching exclusively to ECs for at least half of the study period demonstrated significant reductions in metabolites of ethylene oxide (p = .03) and acrylamide (p < .01).ConclusionSmokers using ECs over 4 weeks maintained cotinine levels and experienced significant reductions in carbon monoxide, NNAL, and two out of eight measured VOC metabolites. Those who switched exclusively to ECs for at least half of the study period significantly reduced two additional VOCs.ImplicationsThis study extends current literature by measuring change in smoking dependence and disease-associated biomarkers, NNAL and a panel of eight common VOCs that are toxic tobacco smoke constituents in smokers who switch to ECs. The findings support the idea of harm reduction, however some levels of toxicant exposure are still of clinical concern, particularly for dual users. Extrapolation of these results must be careful to separate the different toxic exposure results for exclusive switchers versus dual cigarette + EC users, and not to equate harm reduction with the idea that using ECs is harmless.

Project description:IntroductionStudies suggest tobacco and cannabis co-users may experience greater toxicant exposure than exclusive cigarette (ET) smokers. No study has systematically tested differences in toxicant exposure among co-users, exclusive cannabis (ECa) smokers, and ET smokers.Aims and methodsAdult daily cigarette smokers and/or weekly cannabis smokers completed two laboratory visits. Co-users (n = 19) tested positive for urinary 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH), self-reported cannabis use ≥1 per week, and smoked ≥5 cigarettes per day (CPD). ET smokers (n = 18) denied past month cannabis use, tested negative for urinary THCCOOH and smoked ≥5 CPD. ECa smokers (n = 16) tested positive for urinary THCCOOH, self-reported cannabis use ≥1 per week, and denied past month tobacco use (NicAlert <3). Self-reported tobacco and cannabis use were collected at both visits. First morning urinary tobacco and combustion-related biomarkers of exposure were compared following a cannabis or tobacco smoking session (visit 2).ResultsCo-users and ET smokers had higher levels of exhaled carbon monoxide, total nicotine equivalents, metabolites of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNAL), and all four measured mercapturic acids (measures of volatile organic compounds) than ECa smokers (ps < .005). ET smokers (geometric mean = 7220.2 pmol/mg) had higher levels of 2-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid than co-users (geometric mean = 5348.7 adjusted p = .009). Phenanthrene tetraol did not differ by group (p > .05).ConclusionsCo-users and ET smokers demonstrated comparable levels of biomarkers of exposure to harmful constituents despite smoking similar amounts of tobacco. ECa smokers demonstrated lower levels of toxicant exposure for most biomarkers.ImplicationsAlthough ECa smokers are exposed to significantly lower levels of harmful constituents compared with co-users and exclusive cigarette smokers, this group is still exposed to higher levels of toxicants than observed in studies of nonsmokers. Additionally, these three groups were exposed to similar levels of phenanthrene tetraol. It is important to account for cannabis use in studies examining biomarkers of exposure among cigarette smokers. Additionally, further research is needed examining exposure to harmful chemicals among various types of cannabis and tobacco users.

Dataset Information

Acute effects of traditional and electronic cigarettes on palatal blood flow in smokers: A cross-over pilot study.

Background

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Acute effects of traditional and electronic cigarettes on palatal blood flow in smokers: A cross-over pilot study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets