Dataset Information

The Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

ABSTRACT:

Context and objective

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric condition, mostly treated with antidepressant drugs, which are limited due to refractoriness and adverse effects. We describe the study rationale and design of ELECT-TDCS (Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study), which is investigating a non-pharmacological treatment known as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Design and setting

Phase-III, randomized, non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled study, ongoing in São Paulo, Brazil.

Methods

ELECT-TDCS compares the efficacy of active tDCS/placebo pill, sham tDCS/escitalopram 20 mg/day and sham tDCS/placebo pill, for ten weeks, randomizing 240 patients in a 3:3:2 ratio, respectively. Our primary aim is to show that tDCS is not inferior to escitalopram with a non-inferiority margin of at least 50% of the escitalopram effect, in relation to placebo. As secondary aims, we investigate several biomarkers such as genetic polymorphisms, neurotrophin serum markers, motor cortical excitability, heart rate variability and neuroimaging.

Results

Proving that tDCS is similarly effective to antidepressants would have a tremendous impact on clinical psychiatry, since tDCS is virtually devoid of adverse effects. Its ease of use, portability and low price are further compelling characteristics for its use in primary and secondary healthcare. Multimodal investigation of biomarkers will also contribute towards understanding the antidepressant mechanisms of action of tDCS.

Conclusion

Our results have the potential to introduce a novel technique to the therapeutic arsenal of treatments for depression.

SUBMITTER: Brunoni AR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10876376 | biostudies-literature | 2015 May-Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Brunoni André Russowsky AR Sampaio-Junior Bernardo B Moffa Adriano Henrique AH Borrione Lucas L Nogueira Barbara Schwair BS Aparício Luana Vanessa Marotti LV Veronezi Beatriz B Moreno Marina M Fernandes Raquel Albano RA Tavares Diego D Bueno Priscila Vilela Silveira PV Seibt Ole O Bikson Marom M Fraguas Renerio R Benseñor Isabela Martins IM

Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina 20150501 3

<h4>Context and objective</h4>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric condition, mostly treated with antidepressant drugs, which are limited due to refractoriness and adverse effects. We describe the study rationale and design of ELECT-TDCS (Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study), which is investigating a non-pharmacological treatment known as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).<h4>Design and setting</h4>Phase-III, randomi ...[more]

PMID: 26176930

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionPrefrontal cortex (PFC) regions are promising targets for therapeutic applications of non-invasive brain stimulation, e.g. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which has been proposed as a novel intervention for major depressive disorder (MDD) and negative symptoms of schizophrenia (SCZ). However, the effects of tDCS vary inter-individually, and dose-response relationships have not been established. Stimulation parameters are often tested in healthy subjects and transferred to clinical populations. The current study investigates the variability of individual MRI-based electric fields (e-fields) of standard bifrontal tDCS across individual subjects and diagnoses.MethodThe study included 74 subjects, i.e. 25 patients with MDD, 24 patients with SCZ, and 25 healthy controls (HC). Individual e-fields of a common tDCS protocol (i.e. 2 mA stimulation intensity, bifrontal anode-F3/cathode-F4 montage) were modeled by two investigators using SimNIBS (2.0.1) based on structural MRI scans.ResultOn a whole-brain level, the average e-field strength was significantly reduced in MDD and SCZ compared to HC, but MDD and SCZ did not differ significantly. Regions of interest (ROI) analysis for PFC subregions showed reduced e-fields in Sallet areas 8B and 9 for MDD and SCZ compared to HC, whereas there was again no difference between MDD and SCZ. Within groups, we generally observed high inter-individual variability of e-field intensities at a higher percentile of voxels.ConclusionMRI-based e-field modeling revealed significant differences in e-field strengths between clinical and non-clinical populations in addition to a general inter-individual variability. These findings support the notion that dose-response relationships for tDCS cannot be simply transferred from healthy to clinical cohorts and need to be individually established for clinical groups. In this respect, MRI-based e-field modeling may serve as a proxy for individualized dosing.

Project description:IntroductionCervical disc herniation (CDH) is the most common cause of cervical radiculopathy and causes persistent neck pain and neurological deficits. Collagenase chemonucleolysis has been successfully applied to treat lumbar disc herniation, which has a similar pathological mechanism to CDH. However, its application for CDH remains under-researched, and there is an even greater lack of high-quality clinical evidence. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of collagenase chemonucleolysis for treating CDH.MethodsEligible patients with CDH underwent collagenase chemonucleolysis via anterior cervical intradiscal injection or epidural injection. The primary efficacy endpoint showed an excellent and good rate regarding the Odom criteria, which was not lower than the reference value (≥ 78%) at 6 months postoperatively. The secondary efficacy endpoints were the percentage reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores from baseline, which were not lower than the reference values (≥ 40%, ≥ 30%), and improvement in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score compared to the preoperative value. The pre- and postoperative CDH index of patients were also compared. Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).ResultsAn excellent and good rate regarding the Odom criteria 6 months postoperatively was 90.5% (133/147), which was significantly higher than 78% (P < 0.004, 95% confidence interval 85.7-95.2%). The reduction in NRS and NDI scores exceeded 40% (P < 0.001) and 30% (P < 0.001), respectively. The SF-36 scores at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively were significantly higher than those preoperatively (P < 0.001). A significant difference was observed in the pre- and postoperative CDH index (109.6 ± 119.1 vs. 70.8 ± 74.8, P < 0.001). The incidence of AEs was 22.5% (33/147), of which 97.8% were grade 1-2. No collagenase-related AEs and SAEs occurred.ConclusionCollagenase chemonucleolysis treatment for CDH exhibited favorable efficacy and safety and may be a better choice for patients in whom conservative treatment is ineffective.Trial registrationThe trial was registered on www.Chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2200063043).

Dataset Information

The Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Context and objective

Design and setting

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets