Dataset Information

The incidence and impact of atrial fibrillation on hospitalized Coronavirus disease-2019 patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Since 2019, Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has raised unprecedented global health crisis. The incidence and impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on patients with COVID-19 remain unclearly defined.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using ICD-10 codes to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 with or without AF in National Inpatient Sample Database 2020. We compared the outcome of COVID-19 patients with a concurrent diagnosis of AF with those without.

Hypothesis

AF will adversely affect the prognosis of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Results

A total of 211 619 patients with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 were identified. Among these patients, 31 923 (15.08%) had a secondary diagnosis of AF. Before propensity score matching, COVID-AF cohort was older (75.8 vs. 62.2-year-old, p < .001) and had more men (57.5% vs. 52.0%, p < .001). It is associated with more comorbidities, mainly including diabetes mellitus (43.7% vs. 39.9%, p < .001), hyperlipidemia (54.6% vs. 39.8%, p < .001), chronic kidney disease (34.5% vs. 17.0%, p < .001), coronary artery disease (35.3% vs. 14.4%, p < .001), anemia (27.8% vs. 18.6%, p < .001), and cancer (4.8% vs. 3.4%, p < .001). After performing propensity score match, a total of 31 862 patients were matched within each group. COVID-AF cohort had higher inpatient mortality (22.2% vs. 15.3%, p < .001) and more complications, mainly including cardiac arrest (3.9% vs. 2.3%, p < .001), cardiogenic shock (0.9% vs. 0.3%, p < .001), hemorrhagic stroke (0.4% vs. 0.3%, p = .025), and ischemic stroke (1.3% vs. 0.7%, p < .001). COVID-AF cohort was more costly, with a longer length of stay, and a higher total charge.

Conclusion

AF is common in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, and is associated with poorer in-hospital mortality, immediate complications and increased healthcare resource utilization.

SUBMITTER: Niu H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10894524 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The incidence and impact of atrial fibrillation on hospitalized Coronavirus disease-2019 patients.

Niu Haiming H Li Jianwei J Teng Catherine C Lu Xiaojia X Jin Chengyue C Cai Peng P Shi Ao A Shen Xiaoqing X Chen Qiqi Q Chen Miaolian M Yuan Yong Y Li Pengyang P

Clinical cardiology 20240201 2

<h4>Background</h4>Since 2019, Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has raised unprecedented global health crisis. The incidence and impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on patients with COVID-19 remain unclearly defined.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using ICD-10 codes to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 with or without AF in National Inpatient Sample Database 2020. We compared the outcome of COVID-19 patients with a concurrent diagnosis of AF with ...[more]

PMID: 38402574

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Emerging evidence shows that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is commonly complicated by coagulopathy, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered to be a potential cause of unexplained death. Information on the incidence of VTE in COVID-19 patients, however, remains unclear. Method: English-language databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane), Chinese-language databases (CNKI, VIP, WANFANG), and preprint platforms were searched to identify studies with data of VTE occurrence in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Pooled incidence and relative risks (RRs) of VTE were estimated by a random-effects model. Variations were examined based on clinical manifestations of VTE (pulmonary embolism-PE and deep vein thrombosis-DVT), disease severity (severe patients and non-severe patients), and rate of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis (≥60 and <60%). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to strengthen the robustness of results. Meta-regression was performed to explore the risk factors associated with VTE in COVID-19 patients. Results: A total of 17 studies involving 1,913 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were included. The pooled incidence of VTE was 25% (95% CI, 19-31%; I 2, 95.7%), with a significant difference between the incidence of PE (19%; 95% CI, 13-25%; I 2, 93.2%) and DVT (7%; 95% CI, 4-10%; I 2, 88.3%; P interaction < 0.001). Higher incidence was observed in severe COVID-19 patients (35%; 95 CI%, 25-44%; I 2, 92.4%) than that in non-severe patients (6%; 95 CI%, 3-10%; I 2, 62.2%; P interaction < 0.001). The high rate of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 patients (≥60%) was associated with a lower incidence of VTE compared with the low pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis rate (<60%) (19 vs. 40%; P interaction = 0.052). Severe patients had a 3.76-fold increased risk of VTE compared with non-severe patients (RR, 4.76; 95% CI, 2.66-8.50; I 2, 47.0%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the primacy results. Conclusions: This meta-analysis revealed that the estimated VTE incidence was 25% in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Higher incidence of VTE was observed in COVID-19 patients with a severe condition or with a low rate of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Assessment of VTE risk is strongly recommended in COVID-19 patients, and effective measures of thromboprophylaxis should be taken in a timely manner for patients with high risk of VTE.

Project description:ObjectiveThe pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused devastating morbidity and mortality worldwide. In particular, thromboembolic complications have emerged as a key threat for patients with COVID-19. We assessed our experience with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with COVID-19.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with COVID-19 who had undergone upper or lower extremity venous duplex ultrasonography at an academic health system in New York City from March 3, 2020 to April 12, 2020 with follow-up through May 12, 2020. A cohort of hospitalized patients without COVID-19 (non-COVID-19) who had undergone venous duplex ultrasonography from December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 was used for comparison. The primary outcome was DVT. The secondary outcomes included pulmonary embolism, in-hospital mortality, admission to the intensive care unit, and antithrombotic therapy. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors for DVT and mortality.ResultsOf 443 patients (COVID-19, n = 188; and non-COVID-19, n = 255) who had undergone venous duplex ultrasonography, the COVID-19 cohort had had a greater incidence of DVT (31% vs 19%; P = .005) than had the non-COVID-19 cohort. The incidence of pulmonary embolism was not significantly different statistically between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cohorts (8% vs 4%; P = .105). The DVT location in the COVID-19 group was more often distal (63% vs 29%; P < .001) and bilateral (15% vs 4%; P < .001). The duplex ultrasound findings had a significant impact on the antithrombotic plan; 42 patients (72%) with COVID-19 in the DVT group had their therapy escalated and 49 (38%) and 3 (2%) had their therapy escalated and deescalated in the non-DVT group, respectively (P < .001). Within the COVID-19 cohort, the D-dimer level was significantly greater in the DVT group at admission (2746 ng/mL vs 1481 ng/mL; P = .004) and at the duplex examination (6068 ng/mL vs 3049 ng/mL; P < .01). On multivariable analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-4.87; P = .035), intensive care unit admission (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.02-11.44; P = .046), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.01-30.13; P = .049) were independently associated with DVT.ConclusionsGiven the high incidence of venous thromboembolic events in this population, we support the decision to empirically initiate therapeutic anticoagulation for patients with a low bleeding risk and severe COVID-19 infection. Duplex ultrasonography should be reserved for patients with a high clinical suspicion of venous thromboembolism for whom anticoagulation therapy could result in life-threatening consequences. Further study of patients with COVID-19 is warranted to elucidate the etiology of vascular thromboembolic events and guide the prophylactic and therapeutic interventions for these patients.

Project description:BackgroundIndividual studies have reported widely variable rates for VTE and bleeding among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Research questionWhat is the incidence of VTE and bleeding among hospitalized patients with COVID-19?MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, 15 standard sources and COVID-19-specific sources were searched between January 1, 2020, and July 31, 2020, with no restriction according to language. Incidence estimates were pooled by using random effects meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was evaluated by using the I2 statistic, and publication bias was assessed by using the Begg and Egger tests.ResultsThe pooled incidence was 17.0% (95% CI, 13.4-20.9) for VTE, 12.1% (95% CI, 8.4-16.4) for DVT, 7.1% (95% CI, 5.3-9.1) for pulmonary embolism (PE), 7.8% (95% CI, 2.6-15.3) for bleeding, and 3.9% (95% CI, 1.2-7.9) for major bleeding. In subgroup meta-analyses, the incidence of VTE was higher when assessed according to screening (33.1% vs 9.8% by clinical diagnosis), among patients in the ICU (27.9% vs 7.1% in the ward), in prospective studies (25.5% vs 12.4% in retrospective studies), and with the inclusion of catheter-associated thrombosis/isolated distal DVTs and isolated subsegmental PEs. The highest pooled incidence estimate of bleeding was reported for patients receiving intermediate- or full-dose anticoagulation (21.4%) and the lowest in the only prospective study that assessed bleeding events (2.7%).InterpretationAmong hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the overall estimated pooled incidence of VTE was 17.0%, with higher rates with routine screening, inclusion of distal DVT, and subsegmental PE, in critically ill patients and in prospective studies. Bleeding events were observed in 7.8% of patients and were sensitive to use of escalated doses of anticoagulants and nature of data collection. Additional studies are required to ascertain the significance of various thrombotic events and to identify strategies to improve patient outcomes.Trial registryPROSPERO; No.: CRD42020198864; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Dataset Information

The incidence and impact of atrial fibrillation on hospitalized Coronavirus disease-2019 patients.

Background

Methods

Hypothesis

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The incidence and impact of atrial fibrillation on hospitalized Coronavirus disease-2019 patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets