Dataset Information

Genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes in Tunisian patients: Impact on health system.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Cancer management in Africa faces diverse challenges due to limited resources, health system challenges, and other matters. Identifying hereditary cancer syndromic cases is crucial to improve clinical management and preventive care in these settings. This study aims to explore the clinicopathological features and genetic factors associated with hereditary cancer in Tunisia, a North African country with a rising cancer burden MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological features and personal/family history of cancer were explored in 521 patients. Genetic analysis using Sanger and next-generation sequencing was performed for a set of patients RESULTS: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome was the most frequent cluster in which 36 BRCA mutations were identified. We described a subgroup of patients with likely ''breast cancer-only syndrome'' among this cluster. Two cases of Li-Fraumeni syndrome with distinct TP53 mutations namely c.638G>A and c.733G>A have been identified. Genetic investigation also allowed the identification of a new BLM homozygous mutation (c.3254dupT) in one patient with multiple primary cancers. Phenotype-genotype correlation suggests the diagnosis of Bloom syndrome. A recurrent MUTYH mutation (c.1143_1144dup) was identified in three patients with different phenotypes CONCLUSION: Our study calls for comprehensive genetic education and the implementation of genetic screening in Tunisia and other African countries health systems, to reduce the burden of hereditary diseases and improve cancer outcomes in resource-stratified settings.

SUBMITTER: Jandoubi N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10900923 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes in Tunisian patients: Impact on health system.

Jandoubi Nouha N Boujemaa Maroua M Mighri Najah N Mejri Nesrine N Ben Nasr Sonia S Bouaziz Hanen H Berrazega Yosra Y Rachdi Haifa H Daoud Nouha N Zribi Aref A Ayari Jihene J El Benna Houda H Labidi Soumaya S Haddaoui Abderazzek A Mrad Ridha R Ben Ahmed Slim S Boussen Hamouda H Abdelhak Sonia S Boubaker Samir S Hamdi Yosr Y

Translational oncology 20240221

<h4>Introduction</h4>Cancer management in Africa faces diverse challenges due to limited resources, health system challenges, and other matters. Identifying hereditary cancer syndromic cases is crucial to improve clinical management and preventive care in these settings. This study aims to explore the clinicopathological features and genetic factors associated with hereditary cancer in Tunisia, a North African country with a rising cancer burden MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological feature ...[more]

PMID: 38387387

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Detection of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) has implications for cancer screening, prognosis, treatment selection, clinical trial enrollment, and family testing. Published guidelines provide indications for PGV testing, determined by clinical and demographic factors, but their applicability in an ethnically and racially diverse community hospital population is unknown. This study describes the diagnostic and incremental yield of universal multi-gene panel testing in a diverse population in a community cancer practice. Methods We completed a prospective study of proactive germline genetic sequencing among patients with solid tumor malignancies at a community-based oncology practice in downtown Jacksonville, FL, between June 2020 and September 2021. The patients were unselected for cancer type, stage, family history, race/ethnicity, and age. PGVs identified using an 84-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) tumor genomic testing platform were stratified by penetrance. National Comprehensive Cancer Networks (NCCN) guidelines determined incremental PGV rates. Results Two hundred twenty-three patients were enrolled, with a median age of 63 years, 78.5% female. 32.7% were Black/African American, and 5.4% were Hispanic. 39.9% of patients were commercially insured, Medicare/Medicaid insured 52.5%, and 2.7% were uninsured. The most common cancers in this cohort were breast (61.9%), lung (10.3%), and colorectal (7.2%). Twenty-three patients (10.3%) carried one or more PGVs, and 50.2% carried a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Though there was no significant difference in the rate of PGVs based on race/ethnicity, African Americans were numerically more likely to have a VUS reported than whites (P=0.059). Eighteen (8.1%) patients had incremental clinically actionable findings that practice guidelines would not have detected, which was higher in non-whites. Conclusions In this racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse cohort, universal multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) increased diagnostic yield over targeted guideline-informed testing. Rates of VUS and incremental PGV were higher in non-white populations.

Project description:Multi-cancer gene panels for hereditary cancer syndromes (hereditary cancer panels, HCPs) are widely available, and some laboratories have programs that limit patients' out-of-pocket (OOP) cost share. However, little is known about practices by cancer genetic counselors for discussing and ordering an HCP and how insurance reimbursement and patient out-of-pocket share impact these practices. We conducted a survey of cancer genetic counselors based in the United States through the National Society of Genetic Counselors to assess the impact of reimbursement and patient OOP share on ordering of an HCP and hereditary cancer genetic counseling. Data analyses were conducted using chi-square and t tests. We received 135 responses (16% response rate). We found that the vast majority of respondents (94%, 127/135) ordered an HCP for patients rather than single-gene tests to assess hereditary cancer predisposition. Two-thirds of respondents reported that their institution had no protocol related to discussing HCPs with patients. Most respondents (84%, 114/135) indicated clinical indications and patients' requests as important in selecting and ordering HCPs, while 42%, 57/135, considered reimbursement and patient OOP share factors important. We found statistically significant differences in reporting of insurance as a frequently used payment method for HCPs and in-person genetic counseling (84% versus 59%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Perceived patient willingness to pay more than $100 was significantly higher for HCPs than for genetic counseling(41% versus 22%, respectively, p < 0.01). In sum, genetic counselors' widespread selection and ordering of HCPs is driven more by clinical indications and patient preferences than payment considerations. Respondents perceived that testing is more often reimbursed by insurance than genetic counseling, and patients are more willing to pay for an HCP than for genetic counseling. Policy efforts should address this incongruence in reimbursement and patient OOP share. Patient-centered communication should educate patients on the benefit of genetic counseling.

Dataset Information

Genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes in Tunisian patients: Impact on health system.

Introduction

Publications

Genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes in Tunisian patients: Impact on health system.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets