Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparative analysis of malt quality and starch characteristics of three South Korean barley cultivars.


ABSTRACT: In this study, malt was produced in pilot-scale facilities and conditioned using three barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars in South Korea (Heugho, Hopum, and Kwangmaeg). Quality and starch characteristics were compared. The starch content was considerably reduced in all malts. Coleoptile elongation was higher in Heugho (HHM; 85.7% ± 12.6%) and Hopum (HPM; 83.9% ± 10.7%) than in Kwangmaeg (KMM; 78.1% ± 9.9%) malt. Malt yield ranged from 81.8 to 84.9%, with no significant difference. All samples presented type A crystallinity, and granules showed discoid shapes. After malting, the mono- and di-saccharide contents (not including sucrose) were increased. The fermentable sugar level was the highest in HHM, whereas non-fermentable sugar was the highest in KMM. These results suggest that HPM enables efficient scarification based on the rapid degradation of starch, while Heugho barley and HHM have a high potential for beer and malt production, respectively.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10068-023-01419-6.

SUBMITTER: Park J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10908982 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparative analysis of malt quality and starch characteristics of three South Korean barley cultivars.

Park Jiyoung J   Chung Hyun-Jung HJ   Park Hye Young HY   Park Hyun-Jin HJ   Oh Sea-Kwan SK  

Food science and biotechnology 20230905 5


In this study, malt was produced in pilot-scale facilities and conditioned using three barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.) cultivars in South Korea (Heugho, Hopum, and Kwangmaeg). Quality and starch characteristics were compared. The starch content was considerably reduced in all malts. Coleoptile elongation was higher in Heugho (HHM; 85.7% ± 12.6%) and Hopum (HPM; 83.9% ± 10.7%) than in Kwangmaeg (KMM; 78.1% ± 9.9%) malt. Malt yield ranged from 81.8 to 84.9%, with no significant difference. All  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6801258 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10248683 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10434083 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6981388 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6462286 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7019678 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8620510 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9051474 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11796131 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5055883 | biostudies-literature