Dataset Information

Ureteral reimplantation for the management of pelvic lipomatosis.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Pelvic lipomatosis is a rare benign disease characterized by urethral elongation, bladder deformity, and/or hydronephrosis. Conservative management is not effective, and urinary diversion is the most effective treatment option but is usually unacceptable for relatively young patients. Ureteral reimplantation seemed to be an appropriate modality under these conditions. We present one case in which pelvic lipomatosis was managed with ureteral reimplantation.

Patient presentation

A 45-year-old, previously healthy man presented with right flank pain. Pelvic CT and CT urography showed excessive pelvic fat, bilateral hydronephrosis, tortuous ureters, and a pear-shaped bladder, all of which indicated a diagnosis of pelvic lipomatosis. We performed laparoscopic bilateral urinary tract infection on this patient. At follow-up, bilateral hydronephrosis and flank pain were greatly relieved.

Conclusion

Pelvic lipomatosis can be managed safely and effectively by urinary tract infection, but longer follow-up periods are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this approach.

SUBMITTER: Zong D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10909137 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Ureteral reimplantation for the management of pelvic lipomatosis.

Zong Dapeng D Xu Xin X Yan Kai K Xu Nianbiao N Jiang Xingkang X Xu Guoping G Ma Baojie B

IJU case reports 20240201 2

<h4>Introduction</h4>Pelvic lipomatosis is a rare benign disease characterized by urethral elongation, bladder deformity, and/or hydronephrosis. Conservative management is not effective, and urinary diversion is the most effective treatment option but is usually unacceptable for relatively young patients. Ureteral reimplantation seemed to be an appropriate modality under these conditions. We present one case in which pelvic lipomatosis was managed with ureteral reimplantation.<h4>Patient present ...[more]

PMID: 38440700

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivePrimary obstructive megaureter (POM) has various courses in different age populations. Although open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) remains the standard treatment for symptomatic POM, it is highly invasive with potential complications. In recent years, minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation (MIUR), including laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (LUR) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR), and endoscopic management, such as double-J stent insertion, endoureterotomy and endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD), have been utilized for POM in selected patients. However, few comparable studies between MIUR and endoscopic management have been published to date, and it remains unclear which surgical management is the optimal choice for POM in different age groups. This review provides a comprehensive perspective on technical development and clinical outcomes of MIUR and endoscopic management for POM in pediatric and adult populations.MethodsThe PubMed and Web of Science databases were used to comprehensively search English language articles related to MIUR and endoscopic management for POM in pediatric and adult populations up to March 2022. The technical modifications and the relevant clinical outcomes were reviewed.Key content and findingsMIUR with various technical modifications related to intracorporeal suturing and ureteroneocystostomy with anti-reflux techniques appears to be as safe and effective for POM in different age groups as the open procedure. Double-J stent insertion should be regarded as a temporary option for infants by achieving internal urinary drainage, as it may present limited success rates and various complications. Endoureterotomy using pure cutting current or laser appears to be a safer, easier, and less invasive alternative to open surgical management. While EBD has emerged as a definite treatment for POM in the pediatric population, it is debatable whether EBD can substitute for MIUR in adult patients.ConclusionsThe safety and feasibility of MIUR and endoscopic management in patients from all age groups still need further investigation.

Project description:BackgroundPelvic lipomatosis (PL) is a rare condition that is characterized by excessive growth of fat in the pelvic cavity. Studies have yet to systematically review surgical treatments for PL.ObjectivesTo provide a reference for selecting reasonable surgical treatments for PL patients according to previous literature on the surgical treatment of PL.Design and methodsWe conducted this systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) of Individual Participant Data guidelines. Literature on PL published from 1968 to 2022 was retrieved from the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Data were collected and analyzed independently by two independent investigators.ResultsA total of 42 studies, involving 231 patients with PL, were included in the analysis. The surgical treatments included transurethral resection (TUR) (48.5%), ureteral stent placement (11.7%), percutaneous nephrostomy (1.3%), ureterocutaneostomy (1.3%), ureteral reimplantation (10.4%), ileal conduit (13%), and allograft kidney transplantation (0.4%). After excluding patients with unclear prognoses, 42.9% of patients showed improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after TUR. Ureteral stent placement provided relief of hydronephrosis in 62.5% of PL patients. Percutaneous nephrostomy resulted in stable renal function in 33.3% of PL patients, while ureterocutaneostomy led to remission of postoperative hydronephrosis in 33.3% of PL patients. After ureteral reimplantation, 70.8% of patients experienced relief of hydronephrosis or had stable renal function. Ileal conduit led to remission of hydronephrosis, alleviation of symptoms, or maintenance of stable renal function in 83.3% of PL patients. One patient with PL had stable renal function after allograft renal transplantation.ConclusionThe surgical treatments for PL include TUR, ureteral stent placement, urinary diversion, and allograft renal transplantation. However, the choice of surgical method should be determined after comprehensive consideration of the patient's condition.

Project description:BackgroundPelvic lipomatosis (PL) is a rare disease characterized by the overgrowth of pelvic adipose tissue (AT). We investigated the relationships between areas of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and pelvic fat volume (PFV), and analyzed the feasibility of diagnosing PL from a single cross-sectional image.MethodsThe study included 50 patients and 50 controls. We used nnU-Net to segment SAT and VAT automatically. L3 vertebra was set as the zero point (L0), and a total of 201 slices were obtained with a 1 mm interval (L-100 - L+100). We selected 5 pelvic slices, including slices of the anterior superior margin of the S1-S4 vertebrae and the slice above the bilateral femoral head (FH). SAT areas, VAT areas, and PFVs were calculated by computational software. Areas and volumes of 2 groups were compared by t-test or rank-sum test. The correlations among areas and PFV were calculated. Logistic regression models were developed to identify the best slice for predicting PL. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed, and the area under the curve (AUC) and thresholds [with sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE)] were calculated.ResultsVAT areas of L-94 - L-100, L+79 - L+100, S1-S4, and FH indicated statistical differences between patients and controls (P<0.05). The linear regression model with VAT area as the independent variable was established to estimate PFV (FH level: r=0.745, P<0.001, R2=0.555). Among the univariate logistic regression models, VAT area at FH as the independent variable had the highest performance in predicting PL (AUC: 0.893, SEN: 74%, SPE: 94%), followed by S4 level (AUC: 0.800, SEN: 88%, SPE: 66%). The overall accuracy of the logistic regression model including VAT areas at S4 and FH in predicting PL was 88% (AUC: 0.927, SEN: 90%, SPE: 88%).ConclusionsVAT areas at the level of FH can help estimate the value of PFV. VAT areas of S4 and FH provide greater power than a single image for the diagnosis of PL.

Dataset Information

Ureteral reimplantation for the management of pelvic lipomatosis.

Introduction

Patient presentation

Conclusion

Publications

Ureteral reimplantation for the management of pelvic lipomatosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets