Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Bridging the gap between statistical significance and clinical relevance: A systematic review of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds of scales reported in movement disorders research.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest change in an outcome measure that is considered clinically meaningful. Using validated MCID thresholds for outcomes powers trials adequately to detect meaningful treatment effects, aids in their interpretation and guides development of new outcome measures.

Objectives

To provide a comprehensive summary of MCID thresholds of various symptom severity scales reported in movement disorder.

Methods

We conducted systematic review of the literature and included studies of one or more movement disorders, and reporting MCID scales.

Results

2763 reports were screened. Final review included 32 studies. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment showed most studies were of good quality. Most commonly evaluated scale was Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (11 out of 32). Four studies assessing MDS-UPDRS had assessed its different sub-parts, reporting a change of 2.64,3.05,3.25 and 0.9 points to detect clinically meaningful improvement and 2.45,2.51,4.63 and 0.8 points to detect clinically meaningful worsening, for the Part I, II, III and IV, respectively. For Parts II + III, I + II + III and I + II + III + IV, MCID thresholds reported for clinically meaningful improvement were 5.73, 4.9, 6.7 and 7.1 points respectively; while those for clinically meaningful worsening were 4.7, 4.2, 5.2 and 6.3 points, respectively. MCID thresholds reported for other scales included Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSRS), and Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Scale (BFMD).

Conclusion

This review summarizes all the MCID thresholds currently reported in Movement disorders research and provides a comprehensive resource for future trials, highlighting the need for standardized and validated MCID scales in movement disorder research.

SUBMITTER: Mishra B 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10909673 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Bridging the gap between statistical significance and clinical relevance: A systematic review of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds of scales reported in movement disorders research.

Mishra Biswamohan B   Sudheer Pachipala P   Rajan Roopa R   Agarwal Ayush A   Srivastava M V Padma MVP   Nilima Nilima N   Vishnu Venugopalan Y VY  

Heliyon 20240220 5


<h4>Background</h4>Minimum clinically important difference <b>(</b>MCID) is the smallest change in an outcome measure that is considered clinically meaningful. Using validated MCID thresholds for outcomes powers trials adequately to detect meaningful treatment effects, aids in their interpretation and guides development of new outcome measures.<h4>Objectives</h4>To provide a comprehensive summary of MCID thresholds of various symptom severity scales reported in movement disorder.<h4>Methods</h4>  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC11891559 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11343006 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4449899 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10813687 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC12395345 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC12322313 | biostudies-literature
2022-05-23 | GSE203400 | GEO