Dataset Information

[Efficacy of internet-based interventions for depression available in Germany-A systematic review and meta-analysis].

ABSTRACT:

Background

Internet-based interventions (IBIs) for the treatment of depression have been found to have positive effects in international meta-analyses; however, it is unclear whether these effects also extend to IBIs specifically available in Germany. The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the immediate effects and the long-term effects of IBIs available in Germany free of charge or available on prescription and covered by the public health insurances as so-called digital health applications (DiGAs) and to compare the efficacy of DiGAs and freely available IBIs.

Method

A systematic literature search and random-effects meta-analysis were performed (preregistration: INPLASY202250070). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IBIs freely available in Germany or as DiGA in adults with elevated depressive symptoms were compared with active and inactive controls available at the time of the survey in May 2022.

Results

A total of six interventions were identified: COGITO, deprexis, iFightDepression, moodgym, Novego, and Selfapy. The pooled effect size of a total of 28 studies with 13,413 participants corresponded to an effect of Cohen's d = 0.42, (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.31-0.54, I² = 81%). The analysis of long-term effects showed a smaller effect size of d = 0.29, (95% CI: 0.21-0.37, I² = 22%, N = 10). Subgroup analyses indicated a possible superiority of the three interventions listed in the DiGA directory (d = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.74, I² = 83%, N = 15) compared to the three freely available IBIs (d = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.14-0.33, I² = 44%, N = 13, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

The IBIs for depressive disorders available in Germany are effective and can therefore be used in the treatment of people with a depressive disorder; however, it is possible that not all interventions are equally effective.

SUBMITTER: Haaf R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10914865 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

[Efficacy of internet-based interventions for depression available in Germany-A systematic review and meta-analysis].

Haaf Raoul R Vock Pia P Wächtershäuser Nikolaj N Correll Christoph U CU Köhler Stephan S Klein Jan Philipp JP

Der Nervenarzt 20240123 3

<h4>Background</h4>Internet-based interventions (IBIs) for the treatment of depression have been found to have positive effects in international meta-analyses; however, it is unclear whether these effects also extend to IBIs specifically available in Germany. The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the immediate effects and the long-term effects of IBIs available in Germany free of charge or available on prescription and covered by the public health insurances as so-called digital health a ...[more]

PMID: 38260995

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBehavioral activation is an effective treatment for reducing depression. As depressive disorders affect many people worldwide, internet-based behavioral activation (iBA) could provide enhanced treatment access.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate whether iBA is effective in reducing depressive symptoms and to assess the impact on secondary outcomes.MethodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, and CENTRAL up to December 2021 for eligible randomized controlled trials. In addition, a reference search was conducted. Title and abstract screening, as well as a full-text screening, was conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Randomized controlled trials that investigated the effectiveness of iBA for depression as a treatment or main component were included. Randomized controlled trials had to report depressive symptoms, with a quantitative outcome measure and assess an adult population with depressive symptoms above cutoff. Two independent reviewers performed the data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. The primary outcome was self-reported depressive symptoms posttreatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines.ResultsA total of 12 randomized controlled trials, with 3274 participants (88% female, 43.61 years) were included. iBA was more effective in reducing depressive symptom severity posttreatment than inactive control groups (standardized mean difference -0.49; 95% CI -0.63 to -0.34; P<.001). The overall level of heterogeneity was moderate to substantial (I2=53%). No significant effect of iBA on depressive symptoms could be found at 6-month follow-up. Participants assigned to iBA also experienced a significant reduction of anxiety and a significant increase in quality of life and activation compared to the inactive control groups. The results remained robust in multiple sensitivity analyses. The risk of bias assessment revealed at least some concerns for all studies, and there was evidence of slight publication bias.ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis implies that iBA is effective in reducing depressive symptoms. It represents a promising treatment option, providing treatment access where no treatment is available yet.Trial registrationInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021236822; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=236822.

Project description:ImportanceWhile the effects of internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) for depression have been extensively studied, no systematic evidence is available regarding the heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTEs), indicating to what extent patient-by-treatment interactions exist and personalized treatment models might be necessary.ObjectiveTo investigate the HTEs in IMIs for depression as well as their efficacy and effectiveness.Data sourcesA systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Central, and PsycINFO for randomized clinical trials and supplementary reference searches was conducted on October 13, 2019, and updated March 25, 2022. The search string included various terms related to digital psychotherapy, depression, and randomized clinical trials.Study selectionTitles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed by 2 independent researchers. Studies of all populations with at least 1 intervention group receiving an IMI for depression and at least 1 control group were eligible, if they assessed depression severity as a primary outcome and followed a randomized clinical trial (RCT) design.Data extraction and synthesisThis study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. HTE was investigated using logarithmic variance ratios (lnVR) and effect sizes using Hedges g. Three-level bayesian meta-regressions were conducted.Main outcomes and measuresHeterogeneity of treatment effects was the primary outcome of this study; magnitudes of treatment effect sizes were the secondary outcome. Depression severity was measured by different self-report and clinician-rated scales in the included RCTs.ResultsThe systematic review of 102 trials included 19 758 participants (mean [SD] age, 39.9 [10.58] years) with moderate depression severity (mean [SD] in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score, 12.81 [2.93]). No evidence for HTE in IMIs was found (lnVR = -0.02; 95% credible interval [CrI], -0.07 to 0.03). However, HTE was higher in more severe depression levels (β̂ = 0.04; 95% CrI, 0.01 to 0.07). The effect size of IMI was medium (g = -0.56; 95% CrI, -0.46 to -0.66). An interaction effect between guidance and baseline severity was found (β̂ = -0.24, 95% CrI, -0.03 to -0.46).Conclusions and relevanceIn this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, no evidence for increased patient-by-treatment interaction in IMIs among patients with subthreshold to mild depression was found. Guidance did not increase effect sizes in this subgroup. However, the association of baseline severity with HTE and its interaction with guidance indicates a more sensitive, guided, digital precision approach would benefit individuals with more severe symptoms. Future research in this population is needed to explore personalization strategies and fully exploit the potential of IMI.

Project description:Given the high prevalence of overweight and obesity and high comorbidity of depressive symptoms, there is a need for low-threshold, accessible care approaches for people with overweight/obesity aimed at improving mental health. Internet and mobile-based interventions (IMI) represent an innovative complementary treatment option. This review systematically searches for IMI aimed at improving mental health in people with overweight/obesity. We conducted a systematic literature search according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria in the databases MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IMI for adults with overweight/obesity and comorbid depressive symptoms aiming at improving mental health were screened and extracted. Study quality was assessed with RoB 2 (revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool in RCTs). After excluding duplicates, n = 790 results were included in title and abstract screening. After full-text-screening of n = 26 studies, n = 3 RCT studies were included. All interventions aimed to reduce both weight and depressive symptoms. In two RCTs, a significant reduction in both depressive symptoms and weight was achieved. One RCT indicated a significant reduction in depressive symptoms, but not in weight. Two intervention had a duration of 6 months and were guided by health carers, the third takes 3 months and can be used without professional guidance. There is evidence that IMI are effective in improving mental health for people with overweight/obesity and comorbid depressive symptoms. However, currently there are few interventions aiming at reducing depressive symptoms, all targeting English-speaking people. As IMI for depressive symptoms can be easily integrated in the somatic therapy of obesity as additional option and has high public health potential, target group-adapted and low-threshold accessible interventions in different languages should be developed and implemented for improving mental health in people with overweight/obesity. Prospero registration number: CRD42023361771.

Project description:BackgroundMild depression lacks a consistent definition across diagnostic criteria and rating scales, posing challenges to standardizing treatment strategies. International guidelines predominantly recommend psychotherapy as the first-line treatment for mild depression, while the use of antidepressants remains contentious. Supplements such as omega-3 fatty acids, St. John's Wort, and magnesium have garnered attention as alternative therapeutic options for depression. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of pharmacological interventions, including supplements, in the treatment of mild depression.MethodsComprehensive searches were performed in PubMed and Embase through November 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pharmacotherapy or supplements for mild depression diagnosed using standardized criteria. Eligible studies underwent screening and risk of bias assessment utilizing the ROB2 tool. Data on remission rates, symptom improvement, dropout rates, and adverse events were extracted, with meta-analyses conducted where applicable.ResultsEight RCTs comprising 1049 participants met inclusion criteria. Among the agents studied, St. John's Wort was analyzed in two trials, both comparing it to fluoxetine. A meta-analysis found no significant difference in response rates between the two treatments (risk ratio [RR] = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.18) or dropout rates (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.62-1.88). For other agents, single studies evaluated their effects. Eicosapentaenoic acid and Rhodiola rosea demonstrated significant improvements in depressive symptoms compared to placebo. In non-blinded trials, magnesium chloride showed efficacy in alleviating depressive symptoms. Other interventions, such as lavender, lemon balm, and transcranial electroacupuncture stimulation, were as effective as antidepressants. Conversely, S-adenosylmethionine did not produce significant improvements relative to placebo.ConclusionThis review demonstrates that certain supplements, such as eicosapentaenoic acids and Rhodiola rosea, are therapeutic options for mild depression. However, no RCTs compared antidepressants directly to placebo for mild depression. The paucity of high-quality RCTs exclusively targeting mild depression limits definitive conclusions, warranting further rigorous research.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Depression is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Internet- and computer-based interventions (IBIs) have been shown to provide effective, scalable forms of treatment. More than 100 controlled trials and a growing number of meta-analyses published over the past 30 years have demonstrated the efficacy of IBIs in reducing symptoms in the short and long term. Despite the large body of research, no comprehensive review or meta-analysis has been conducted to date that evaluates how the effectiveness of IBIs has evolved over time. OBJECTIVE:This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether there has been a change in the effectiveness of IBIs on the treatment of depression over the past 30 years and to identify potential variables moderating the effect size. METHODS:A sensitive search strategy will be executed across the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. Data extraction and evaluation will be conducted by two independent researchers. Risk of bias will be assessed. A multilevel meta-regression model will be used to analyze the data and estimate effect size. RESULTS:The search was completed in mid-2019. We expect the results to be submitted for publication in early 2020. CONCLUSIONS:The year 2020 will mark 30 years since the first paper was published on the use of IBIs for the treatment of depression. Despite the large and rapidly growing body of research in the field, evaluations of effectiveness to date are missing the temporal dimension. This review will address that gap and provide valuable analysis of how the effectiveness of interventions has evolved over the past three decades; which participant-, intervention-, and study-related variables moderate changes in effectiveness; and where research in the field may benefit from increased focus. TRIAL REGISTRATION:PROSPERO CRD42019136554; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=136554. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/14860.

Dataset Information

[Efficacy of internet-based interventions for depression available in Germany-A systematic review and meta-analysis].

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Publications

[Efficacy of internet-based interventions for depression available in Germany-A systematic review and meta-analysis].

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets