Summary of the best evidence for the prevention of nasal injury in preterm infants with nasal noninvasive ventilation
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Fu Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10915449 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundNoninvasive ventilation is being increasingly used on preterm infants to reduce ventilator lung injury and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) to prevent intubation in premature infants.MethodsProspective observational study of SNIPPV use on preterm infants of less than 32 weeks' gestation. All patients were managed using a prospective protocol intended to reduce invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV) use. Previous respiratory status, as well as respiratory outcomes and possible secondary side effects were analyzed.ResultsSNIPPV was used on 78 patients: electively to support extubation on 25 ventilator-dependent patients and as a rescue therapy after nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure on 53 patients. For 92% of patients in the elective group and 66% in the rescue group, iMV was avoided over the following 72 hours. No adverse effects were detected, and all patients were in a stable condition even if intubation was eventually needed.ConclusionsThe application of SNIPPV in place of or to remove mechanical ventilation avoids intubation in 74.4% of preterm infants with respiratory failure. No adverse effects were detected.
| S-EPMC4974112 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo search for and collect evidence on human milk fortifier in preterm infants, and to summarize the latest and best evidence, so as to provide reference for clinical work.MethodsWe searched the databases of UpToDate, American Guide Network, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), PubMed, ResearchGate, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, Chinese Biology Medicine disc (CBM), and Yi Maitong, and collected relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, evidence summaries, expert consensuses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The retrieval time limit was from the database establishment to July 2021. The quality of the literature was independently evaluated by 2 researchers, who then extracted and summarized the evidence from qualifying articles.ResultsA total of 16 articles were selected, including 3 guidelines, 3 systematic reviews, 5 expert consensuses, 3 RCTs, and 1 best practice guideline, including indications, time for usage, methods, monitoring and management, time of cessation, health education, and post-discharge feeding.ConclusionsThis study summarized the best evidence for human milk fortifier in preterm infants. Medical staff should assess the specific clinical conditions and parental wishes when applying the best evidence to ensure the effectiveness and safety of human milk fortifier, thus improving the quality of clinical nursing.
| S-EPMC8649601 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) is a newly developed noninvasive ventilation technique with promising clinical and ventilatory outcomes for preterm infants. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether NIV-NAVA has better clinical and ventilatory outcomes than nasal continuous airway pressure (NCPAP) or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPP) on premature infants. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared NIV-NAVA with NCPAP or NIPP for preterm infants (gestational age: <37 weeks) were included. We evaluated the following outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit: the desaturation rate, failure of noninvasive modality requiring intubation when received as the primary mode or the need for re-intubation after extubation from mechanical ventilation in the secondary mode (weaning), length of stay, and fraction of inspired oxygen. The mean difference and risk ratio were used to represent continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. We included nine RCTs involving 339 preterm infants overall. NIV-NAVA showed similar clinical and ventilatory outcomes to NCPAP or NIPP, except for the maximum diaphragmatic electrical activity. The rate of failure of the noninvasive modality was not statistically different between NIV-NAVA and NCPAP. The pooled estimates for the maximum electrical activity were significantly reduced in NIV-NAVA compared with those in NIPP. The findings suggest that NIV-NAVA may be as safe and effective as NCPAP and NIPP for preterm neonates, particularly those who may not tolerate these alternative noninvasive methods. However, further trials are recommended for greater evidence.
| S-EPMC10741611 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The factors influencing weaning of preterm infants from noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are poorly defined and the weaning decisions are often driven by subjective judgement rather than objective measures. To standardize quantification of respiratory effort, the Silverman-Andersen Score (SAS) was included in our nursing routine. We investigated the factors that steer the weaning process and whether the inclusion of the SAS would lead to more stringent weaning. Following SAS implementation, we prospectively evaluated 33 neonates born ≤ 32 + 0 weeks gestational age. Age-, weight- and sex-matched infants born before routine SAS evaluation served as historic control. In 173 of 575 patient days, NIV was not weaned despite little respiratory distress (SAS ≤ 2), mainly due to bradycardias (60% of days without weaning), occurring alone (40%) or in combination with other factors such as apnea/desaturations. In addition, "soft factors" that are harder to grasp impact on weaning decisions, whereas the SAS overall played a minor role. Consequently, ventilation times did not differ between the groups. In conclusion, NIV weaning is influenced by various factors that override the absence of respiratory distress limiting the predictive value of the SAS. An awareness of the factors that influence weaning decisions is important as prolonged use of NIV has been associated with adverse outcome. Guidelines are necessary to standardize NIV weaning practice.
| S-EPMC9497739 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceSeveral respiratory support techniques are available to minimize the use of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in preterm neonates. It is unknown whether noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) is more efficacious than nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in preterm neonates after their first extubation.ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that NHFOV is more efficacious than NCPAP or NIPPV in reducing IMV after extubation and until neonatal intensive care unit discharge among preterm neonates.Design, setting, and participantsThis multicenter, pathophysiology-based, assessor-blinded, 3-group, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 69 tertiary referral neonatal intensive care units in China, recruiting participants from December 1, 2017, to May 31, 2021. Preterm neonates who were between the gestational age of 25 weeks plus 0 days and 32 weeks plus 6 days and were ready to be extubated were randomized to receive NCPAP, NIPPV or NHFOV. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.InterventionsThe NCPAP, NIPPV, or NHFOV treatment was initiated after the first extubation and lasted until discharge.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes were total duration of IMV, need for reintubation, and ventilator-free days. These outcomes were chosen to describe the effect of noninvasive ventilation strategy on the general need for IMV.ResultsA total of 1440 neonates (mean [SD] age at birth, 29.4 [1.8] weeks; 860 boys [59.7%]) were included in the trial. Duration of IMV was longer in NIPPV (mean difference, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.01-2.3 days; P = .04) and NCPAP (mean difference, 1.5 days; 95% CI, 0.3-2.7 days; P = .01) compared with NHFOV. Neonates who were treated with NCPAP needed reintubations more often than those who were treated with NIPPV (risk difference: 8.1%; 95% CI, 2.9%-13.3%; P = .003) and NHFOV (risk difference, 12.5%; 95% CI, 7.5%-17.4%; P < .001). There were fewer ventilator-free days in neonates treated with NCPAP than in those treated with NIPPV (median [25th-75th percentile] difference, -3 [-6 to -1] days; P = .01). There were no differences between secondary efficacy or safety outcomes, except for the use of postnatal corticosteroids (lower in NHFOV than in NCPAP group; risk difference, 7.3%; 95% CI, 2.6%-12%; P = .002), weekly weight gain (higher in NHFOV than in NCPAP group; mean difference, -0.9 g/d; 95% CI, -1.8 to 0 g/d; P = .04), and duration of study intervention (shorter in NHFOV than in NIPPV group; median [25th-75th percentile] difference, -1 [-3 to 0] days; P = .01).Conclusions and relevanceResults of this trial indicated that NHFOV, if used after extubation and until discharge, slightly reduced the duration of IMV in preterm neonates, and both NHFOV and NIPPV resulted in a lower risk of reintubation than NCPAP. All 3 respiratory support techniques were equally safe for this patient population.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03181958.
| S-EPMC9039831 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPreterm infants often require mechanical ventilation (MV), which can be a painful experience. Opioids (such as morphine) are used to provide analgesia, despite conflicting evidence about their impact on the developing brain. We aimed to quantify the use of opioids during MV in infants born at <32 weeks' gestational age and to investigate the association between opioid use and evidence of brain injury.MethodsIn this retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study, we used routinely recorded data from the National Neonatal Research Database to study infants born at 22-31 weeks gestational age who were admitted to neonatal units in England and Wales (between Jan 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2020) and who were mechanically ventilated on one or more days during their hospital stay. We used propensity score matching to identify pairs of infants (one who received opioids during MV and one who did not) with similar demographic and clinical characteristics. The pre-specified primary outcome was preterm brain injury assessed in all infants who received MV for more than two days and had evidence of preterm brain injury at or before discharge from neonatal care. Adjusted analyses accounted for differences in infants' characteristics, including illness severity and painful/surgical conditions.FindingsOf 67,206 infants included, 45,193 (67%) were mechanically ventilated for one or more days and 26,201 (58% of 45,193) received an opioid whilst ventilated. Opioids were given for a median of 67% of ventilated days (IQR 43-92%) and the median exposure was 4 days (2-11). The percentage of mechanically ventilated infants who received opioids while ventilated increased from 52% in 2012 to 60% in 2020 (morphine, 51%-56%; fentanyl, 6%-18%). In the propensity score-matched cohort of 3608 pairs who were ventilated for >2 consecutive days, the odds of any preterm brain injury (adjusted odds ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.35) were higher in those who received opioids compared with those who did not (received opioids, 990/3608 (27.4%) vs. did not receive opioids, 855/3608 (23.7%). The adjusted odds of these adverse outcomes increased with increasing number of days of opioid exposure.InterpretationUse of opioids during mechanical ventilation of preterm infants increased during the study period (2012-2020). Although causation cannot be determined, among those ventilated for >2 consecutive days, these data suggest that opioid use is associated with an increased risk of preterm brain injury and the risk increases with longer durations of exposure.FundingUniversity of Nottingham Impact Fund.
| S-EPMC10632414 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNoninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV), a relatively new modality, is gaining popularity despite scarce evidence. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nHFOV as respiratory support in premature infants.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception of the database to January 2019. All published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of nHFOV therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or biphasic nCPAP (BP-CPAP) in newborns for respiratory support were included. All meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3.ResultsA total of 8 RCTs involving 463 patients were included. The meta-analysis estimated a lower risk of intubation (relative risk = 0.50, 95% confidence interval of 0.36 to 0.70) and more effective clearance of carbon dioxide (weighted mean difference = - 4.61, 95% confidence interval of - 7.94 to - 1.28) in the nHFOV group than in the nCPAP/BP-CPAP group.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that nHFOV, as respiratory support in preterm infants, significantly remove carbon dioxide and reduce the risk of intubation compared with nCPAP/BP-CPAP. The appropriate parameter settings for different types of noninvasive high-frequency ventilators, the effect of nHFOV in extremely preterm infants, and the long-term safety of nHFOV need to be assessed in large trials.
| S-EPMC6420773 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The importance of nutritional supply for somatic growth and neurodevelopmental outcome in very-low-birthweight infants is an established medical strategy for reducing long-term morbidities. Our cohort study on rapid enteral feeding advances using a standardized protocol (STENA) previously demonstrated a 4-day reduction of parenteral nutrition. STENA did not impede the success of noninvasive ventilations strategies but significantly less infants required mechanical ventilation. Most importantly, STENA resulted in improved somatic growth at 36 weeks of gestation. Here, we evaluated our cohort for psychomotor outcomes and somatic growth at 2 years of age. n = 218 infants of the original cohort were followed-up (74.4%). Z-scores for weight and length did not differ but the benefits of STENA for head circumference persisted until the age of 2 years (p = 0.034). Concerning the psychomotor outcome, we neither found any statistically significant differences in the mental developmental index (MDI) (p = 0.738), norin the psychomotor developmental index (PDI) (p = 0.122). In conclusion, our data adds important insights on the topic of rapid enteral feeding advances and confirms the safety of STENA with respect to somatic growth and psychomotor outcome measures.
| S-EPMC10005522 | biostudies-literature
Project description:High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) via facemask or helmet have been increasingly used in managing acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) owing to COVID-19 with the premise of reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and possibly mortality. Their use carries the risk of delaying intubation and nosocomial infection transmission. To date, most studies on the effectiveness of these modalities are observational and suggest that HFNO and NIV have a role in the management of AHRF owing to COVID-19. Trials are ongoing and are evaluating different aspects of noninvasive respiratory support in patients with AHRF owing to COVID-19.
| S-EPMC8743492 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIntracranial infection is one of the most serious complications after pituitary neoplasm resection. However, the quality of the evidence for existing preventive measures varies significantly, and the related content is scattered, and the scope is broad. Nurses lack the specificity and targeted guidance for preventing intracranial infections after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS), and nurses find that evidence necessitates screening and identification during its application, and it is challenging to utilize current tool for guiding clinical practice. Thus, the protocols for preventing intracranial infection after EETS required further refinement. The aim of this study is to summarize the relevant evidence for preventing postoperative intracranial infections after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary neoplasm resection, in order to reduce the incidence of postoperative intracranial infection and provide a reference for clinical medical staff.MethodsWe systematically searched a variety of platforms, including British Medical Journal Best Practice, UpToDate, DynaMed, Guidelines International Network, Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Australian Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence based Healthcare Center Database, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Medlive, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Chinese biomedical literature service system (Sinomed) to collect clinical decisions, relevant guidelines, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, and expert consensus documents on the prevention of intracranial infection in this context according to the 6S evidence model. The search included literature published up to December, 2023. Then conduct literature screening and evaluation, extract and summarize relevant evidence on perioperative prevention of intracranial infection after EETS from the selected literature. Two researchers applied the JBI levels of evidence preappraisal system (2014 version) to categorize the included evidence into five levels (level 1a being the highest and level 5c being the lowest).ResultsA total of 16 pieces of literature were reviewed, including 6 clinical decision-makings, 2 guidelines, 2 systematic reviews, and 6 expert consensus documents. Ultimately, 24 pieces of best evidence for preventing intracranial infections after EETS for pituitary adenomas were formed, and they will be divided into four categories: multidisciplinary collaboration, preoperative evaluation and informed consent, intraoperative prevention and control, and postoperative observation and prevention.ConclusionsThis summarized the best evidence for preventing intracranial infection after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary neoplasms resection. Summary of the best evidence for preventing intracranial infections following EETS plays a critical role in enhancing surgical success, optimizing patient management, fostering multidisciplinary collaboration, advancing research, and improving patient satisfaction. It is recommended that medical staff select and apply the evidence in clinical practice in order to avoid the occurrence of intracranial infections.
| S-EPMC11558293 | biostudies-literature