Dataset Information

PEGylated nanoparticles interact with macrophages independently of immune response factors and trigger a non-phagocytic, low-inflammatory response.

ABSTRACT: Poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG)-based nanoparticles (NPs) - including cylindrical micelles (CNPs), spherical micelles (SNPs), and PEGylated liposomes (PLs) - are hypothesized to be cleared in vivo by opsonization followed by liver macrophage phagocytosis. This hypothesis has been used to explain the rapid and significant localization of NPs to the liver after administration into the mammalian vasculature. Here, we show that the opsonization-phagocytosis nexus is not the major factor driving PEG-NP - macrophage interactions. First, mouse and human blood proteins had insignificant affinity for PEG-NPs. Second, PEG-NPs bound macrophages in the absence of serum proteins. Third, lipoproteins blocked PEG-NP binding to macrophages. Because of these findings, we tested the postulate that PEG-NPs bind (apo)lipoprotein receptors. Indeed, PEG-NPs triggered an in vitro macrophage transcription program that was similar to that triggered by lipoproteins and different from that triggered by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and group A Streptococcus. Unlike LPS and pathogens, PLs did not increase transcripts involved in phagocytosis or inflammation. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) and SNPs triggered remarkably similar mouse bone-marrow-derived macrophage transcription programs. Unlike opsonized pathogens, CNPs, SNPs, and PLs lowered macrophage autophagosome levels and either reduced or did not increase the secretion of key macrophage pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Thus, the sequential opsonization and phagocytosis process is likely a minor aspect of PEG-NP - macrophage interactions. Instead, PEG-NP interactions with (apo)lipoprotein and scavenger receptors appear to be a strong driving force for PEG-NP - macrophage binding, entry, and downstream effects. We hypothesize that the high presence of these receptors on liver macrophages and on liver sinusoidal endothelial cells is the reason PEG-NPs localize rapidly and strongly to the liver.

SUBMITTER: Asoudeh M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10922886 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

PEGylated nanoparticles interact with macrophages independently of immune response factors and trigger a non-phagocytic, low-inflammatory response.

Asoudeh Monireh M Nguyen Nicole N Raith Mitch M Denman Desiree S DS Anozie Uche C UC Mokhtarnejad Mahshid M Khomami Bamin B Skotty Kaitlyn M KM Isaac Sami S Gebhart Taylor T Vaigneur Lauren L Gelgie Aga A Dego Oudessa Kerro OK Freeman Trevor T Beever Jon J Dalhaimer Paul P

Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society 20240105

Poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG)-based nanoparticles (NPs) - including cylindrical micelles (CNPs), spherical micelles (SNPs), and PEGylated liposomes (PLs) - are hypothesized to be cleared in vivo by opsonization followed by liver macrophage phagocytosis. This hypothesis has been used to explain the rapid and significant localization of NPs to the liver after administration into the mammalian vasculature. Here, we show that the opsonization-phagocytosis nexus is not the major factor driving PEG-NP - ...[more]

PMID: 38123071

Similar Datasets

Project description:Poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG)-based nanoparticles (NPs) - including cylindrical micelles (CNPs), spherical micelles (SNPs), and PEGylated liposomes (PLs) - are hypothesized to be cleared in vivo by opsonization followed by liver macrophage phagocytosis. This hypothesis has been used to explain the rapid and significant localization of NPs to the liver after administration into the mammalian vasculature. Here, we show that the opsonization-phagocytosis nexus is not the major factor driving PEG-NP – macrophage interactions. First, mouse and human blood proteins had insignificant affinity for PEG-NPs. Second, PEG-NPs bound macrophages in the absence of serum proteins. Third, lipoproteins blocked PEG-NP binding to macrophages. Because of these findings, we tested the postulate that PEG-NPs bind (apo)lipoprotein receptors. Indeed, PEG-NPs triggered an in vitro macrophage transcription program that was similar to that triggered by lipoproteins and different from that triggered by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and group A Streptococcus. Unlike LPS and pathogens, PLs did not increase transcripts involved in phagocytosis or inflammation. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) and SNPs triggered remarkably similar mouse bone-marrow-derived macrophage transcription programs. Unlike opsonized pathogens, CNPs, SNPs, and PLs lowered macrophage autophagosome levels and either reduced or did not increase the secretion of key macrophage pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Thus, the sequential opsonization and phagocytosis process is likely a minor aspect of PEG-NP – macrophage interactions. Instead, PEG-NP interactions with (apo)lipoprotein and scavenger receptors appear to be a strong driving force for PEG-NP – macrophage binding, entry, and downstream effects. We hypothesize that the high presence of these receptors on liver macrophages and on liver sinusoidal endothelial cells is the reason PEG-NPs localize rapidly and strongly to the liver. To investigate the response of macrophages to nanoparticles, we incubated PEGylated liposomes (PLs), spherical nanoparticles (SNPs), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), Group A Streptococcus pathogens (JRS4), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with RAW264.7 and primary bone-marrow derived mouse macrophages

Dataset Information

PEGylated nanoparticles interact with macrophages independently of immune response factors and trigger a non-phagocytic, low-inflammatory response.

Publications

PEGylated nanoparticles interact with macrophages independently of immune response factors and trigger a non-phagocytic, low-inflammatory response.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets