Dataset Information

Nonintubated spontaneous ventilation versus intubated mechanical ventilation anesthesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery in terms of perioperative complications and practitioners' workload assessments: a pilot randomized control study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The use of nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (NI-VATS) has been increasingly reported to yield favourable outcomes. However, this technology has not been routinely used because its advantages and safety have not been fully confirmed. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of nonintubated spontaneous ventilation (NI-SV) anesthesia compared to intubated mechanical ventilation (I-MV) anesthesia in VATS by evaluating of perioperative complications and practitioners' workloads.

Methods

Patients who underwent uniportal VATS were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive NI-SV or I-MV anesthesia. The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative airway intervention events, including transient MV, conversion to intubation and repositioning of the double-lumen tube. The secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and modified National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) scores from anesthesiologists and surgeons.

Results

Thirty-five patients in each group were enrolled in the intention-to-treat analysis. The incidence of intraoperative airway intervention events was greater in the NI-SV group than in the I-MV group (12 [34.3%] vs. 3 [8.6%]; OR = 0.180; 95% CI = 0.045-0.710; p = 0.009). No significant difference was found in the postoperative pulmonary complications between the groups (p > 0.05). The median of the anesthesiologists' overall NASA-TLX score was 37.5 (29-52) when administering the NI-SV, which was greater than the 25 (19-34.5) when the I-MV was administered (p < 0.001). The surgeons' overall NASA-TLX score was comparable between the two ventilation strategies (28 [21-38.5] vs. 27 [20.5-38.5], p = 0.814).

Conclusion

The NI-SV anesthesia was feasible for VATS in the selected patients, with a greater incidence of intraoperative airway intervention events than I-MV anesthesia, and with more surgical effort required by anesthesiologists.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200055427. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=147872 was registered on January 09, 2022.

SUBMITTER: Kong XG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10929236 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Nonintubated spontaneous ventilation versus intubated mechanical ventilation anesthesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery in terms of perioperative complications and practitioners' workload assessments: a pilot randomized control study.

Kong Xian-Gang XG Wang Kun K Wei Yu-Tao YT Sun Bo B Gao Guo-Dong GD Song Cheng-Wei CW Li Cheng-Wen CW

BMC anesthesiology 20240312 1

<h4>Background</h4>The use of nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (NI-VATS) has been increasingly reported to yield favourable outcomes. However, this technology has not been routinely used because its advantages and safety have not been fully confirmed. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of nonintubated spontaneous ventilation (NI-SV) anesthesia compared to intubated mechanical ventilation (I-MV) anesthesia in VATS by evaluating of perioperative complic ...[more]

PMID: 38475699

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNonintubated anesthesia avoids invasive tracheal intubation operations and reduces trauma. in addition, it has advantages in lung surgery in some patients with poor lung function, in line with the concept of rapid recovery. However, few studies have discussed the clinical significance of Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with nonintubated anesthesia in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). We conducted a retrospective study to examine the safety and availability of nonintubated anesthesia single-port video-assisted lung surgery (NI-SP-VALS) combined with ERAS programs in patients.MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective study. All patients were preoperatively diagnosed with lung nodules and underwent NI-SP-VALS or intubated anesthesia SP-VALS (I-SP-VALS) combined with ERAS programs between July 2021 and March 2022. Short-term postoperative outcomes were compared in 2 cohorts.ResultsIn total, 272 patients were included. Among them, 91 patients received NI-SP-VALS combined with ERAS programs (observation group), and 181 underwent intubation anesthesia (control group). Baseline data were statistically different between the two groups, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) matching was used. A total of 73 patients remained in each group after PSM, and baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 cohorts. The time of hospital stay [4.00 (4.00-5.00) vs. 44.50 (0.00-5.75) d; P=0.029] and catheter stay [0.50 (0.20-2.00) vs. 2.00 (2.00-2.00) d; P<0.001] were significantly shorter, the white blood cell count (WBC) [9.45 (8.08-11.30) vs. 11 (8.50-12.80)/L; P=0.009] and the lowest SpO2 in operation [96.00 (94.00-97.50) vs. 97.00 (95.00-98.50); P=0.035] were also lower in the nonintubated group than those of the intubated group. No differences were observed in variables of intraoperation, other routine blood indexes, postoperative drainage, postoperative medicine use, postoperative symptoms, complications, hospitalization expenses, postoperative follow-up index, or self-assessment of anxiety.ConclusionsThe data after PSM shows that compared with intubated anesthesia, NI-SP-VALS combined with ERAS programs is safe and effective. Nonintubated anesthesia promotes rapid recovery of patients and reduces postoperative inflammatory reactions. Hence, nonintubated anesthesia may conform to the idea of ERAS and has application value in thoracic surgery.

Project description:BackgroundSince postoperative pulmonary complications are one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing lung resection surgery, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and hospital death, and the length of hospital stay in patients who received nonintubated or intubated anesthesia during thoracoscopic surgery for lung resection and further explore the tricks in nonintubated anesthesia.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to September 2017. We included eligible research comparing nonintubated anesthesia with intubated anesthesia in thoracoscopic surgery for lung resection. The primary outcomes involved postoperative pulmonary complications, hospital death, and hospital stay. The rates and causes of conversion from nonintubated anesthesia to intubated anesthesia were also analyzed.ResultsAfter screening through 754 potentially relevant articles, we included 3 randomized controlled trials and 7 observational studies with 1138 patients. There was no perioperative mortality in 2 groups. The nonintubated group revealed comparable postoperative pulmonary complications (OR = 0.57; P = .07; P for heterogeneity = .49, I = 0%) and shorter hospital stay (WMD = -1.10; P < .00001; P for heterogeneity = .84, I = 0%) in overall findings with little heterogeneity.ConclusionNonintubated anesthesia in thoracoscopic surgery for lung resection shortened the length of hospital stay compared with intubated anesthesia. However, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was comparable between nonintubated and intubated group. Given the potential perioperative emergencies, such as persistent hypoxemia, carbon dioxide retention, or extensive pleural adhesions, nonintubated anesthesia in lung resection surgery requires extra vigilance to ensure the safety of the patients and the success of the surgery. Powerful randomized controlled trials in the future are essential to provide more certainty and address long-term effectiveness. Only when anesthesiologists and surgeons make efforts together can better clinical outcomes in lung resection surgery be achieved.

Project description:BackgroundVideo-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) generally involves endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia. However, inevitably, this may cause intubation-related complications and prolong the postoperative recovery process. Gradually, non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NIVATS) is increasingly being utilized. However, its safety and efficacy remain controversial.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to August 2020 were selected from the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases and included in this study according to the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers screened these RCTs and independently extracted the relevant data. After assessing the risk of bias in these RCTs, a meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Pooled data were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model.ResultsMeta-analysis data demonstrated that the mean difference (MD) in the length of hospital stay between non-intubated patients and intubated patients was -1.41 days, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of -2.47 to -0.34 (P=0.01). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score between the two groups showed a MD of -0.34 (95% CI: -0.58 to -0.10; P=0.006). Patients who underwent NIVATS presented with lower rates of overall complications [odds ratio (OR) 0.41; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.67; P=0.0004], air leak (OR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.87; P=0.02), pharyngeal discomfort (OR 0.08; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.17; P<0.00001), hoarseness (OR 0.06; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.21; P<0.00001), and gastrointestinal reactions (OR 0.23; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.53; P=0.0005) compared to intubated patients. The anesthesia satisfaction scores in the NIVATS group were significantly higher than those of the VATS group (MD 0.50; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.88; P=0.009). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the length of operation time (MD 0.90 hours; 95% CI: -0.23 to 2.03; P=0.12) and surgical field satisfaction (1 point) (OR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.59; P=0.43) between the two groups.ConclusionsNIVATS is a safe and feasible form of intervention that can reduce the postoperative pain and complications of various systems and shorten hospital stay duration without prolonging the operation time.

Project description:ObjectiveNonintubated anesthesia, electromagnetic navigation (EMN)-guided preoperative localization, and uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are recent innovations in minimally invasive thoracic surgery. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of applying nonintubated anesthesia in a "one-stage" localization and resection workflow.MethodsPatients who underwent EMN-guided preoperative percutaneous localization with indocyanine green (ICG) and uniportal VATS were included. Perioperative data were compared between patients receiving nonintubated anesthesia and those receiving general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.ResultsForty-six patients with a total of 50 nodules were included in the study. Overall, finger palpation could be avoided in 94% of the nodules, whereas fluorescent green signals with a clear border on the pleural surface were noted in 91.3% (21 of 23) of nodules in the nonintubated group and 88.9% (24 of 27) of nodules in the intubated group. Intraoperatively, the nonintubated group had a lower median pH (7.33 [interquartile range (IQR), 7.28-7.40] vs 7.41 [IQR, 7.38-7.44]; P = .003), higher median arterial CO2 (45.5 [IQR, 41.1-58.7] mm Hg vs 38.4 [IQR, 35.3-40.6] mm Hg; P < .001), and lower arterial oxygen (322 [IQR, 211-433] mm Hg vs 426 [IQR, 355-471] mm Hg; P = .005) levels compared with the intubated group. The nonintubated group also had a shorter median registration time (2.0 [IQR, 1.0-3.0] minutes vs 3.0 [IQR, 2.0-8.0] minutes; P = .008) and total time in the operating room (150 [IQR, 130-175] minutes vs 170 [IQR, 135-203] minutes; P = .035), whereas no between-group differences were seen in localization and operative time. The duration of chest drainage, postoperative complications, pathologic diagnosis, and margins were similar in the 2 groups.ConclusionsNonintubated "one-stage" EMN-guided percutaneous ICG localization and uniportal VATS can be an option for selected patients undergoing treatment for small peripheral nodules.

Project description:Background and objectiveThoracic surgery causes significant pain which can negatively affect pulmonary function and increase risk of postoperative complications. Effective analgesia is important to reduce splinting and atelectasis. Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) have been used for decades and are effective at treating acute post-thoracotomy pain, although both have risks and adverse effects. The advancement of thoracoscopic surgery, a focus on multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesics, and the development of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques have greatly expanded the options for acute pain management after thoracic surgery. Despite the expansion of surgical techniques and analgesic approaches, there is no clear optimal approach to pain management. This review aims to summarize the body of literature regarding systemic and regional anesthetic techniques for thoracic surgery in both thoracotomy and minimally invasive approaches, with a goal of providing a foundation for providers to make individualized decisions for patients depending on surgical approach and patient factors, and to discuss avenues for future research.MethodsWe searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 2021 using the terms "thoracic surgery", "thoracic surgery AND pain management", "thoracic surgery AND analgesia", "thoracic surgery AND regional anesthesia", "thoracic surgery AND epidural". We considered articles written in English and available to the reader.Key content and findingsThere is a wide variety of strategies for treating acute pain after thoracic surgery, including multimodal opioid and non-opioid systemic analgesics, regional anesthesia including TEA and paravertebral blocks (PVB), and a recent expansion in the use of novel fascial plane blocks especially for thoracoscopy. The body of literature on the effectiveness of different approaches for thoracotomy and thoracoscopy is a rapidly expanding field and area of active debate.ConclusionsThe optimal analgesic approach for thoracic surgery may depend on patient factors, surgical factors, and institutional factors. Although TEA may provide optimal analgesia after thoracotomy, PVB and emerging fascial plane blocks may offer effective alternatives. A tailored approach using multimodal systemic therapies and regional anesthesia is important, and future studies comparing techniques are necessary to further investigate the optimal approach to improve patient outcomes.

Dataset Information

Nonintubated spontaneous ventilation versus intubated mechanical ventilation anesthesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery in terms of perioperative complications and practitioners' workload assessments: a pilot randomized control study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Publications

Nonintubated spontaneous ventilation versus intubated mechanical ventilation anesthesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery in terms of perioperative complications and practitioners' workload assessments: a pilot randomized control study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets