The impact of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines on real-world initial lipid-lowering therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Kong X
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10956955 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:AimsTo estimate the proportion of patients with a recent myocardial infarction (MI) who would be eligible for additional lipid-lowering therapy according to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias, and to simulate the effects of expanded lipid-lowering therapy on attainment of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target as recommended by the guidelines.Methods and resultsUsing the nationwide SWEDEHEART register, we included 25 466 patients who had attended a follow-up visit 6-10 weeks after an MI event, 2013-17. While most patients (86.6%) were receiving high-intensity statins, 82.9% of the patients would be eligible for expanded lipid-lowering therapy, as they had not attained the target of an LDL-C level of <1.4 mmol and a ≥50% LDL-C level reduction. When maximized use of high-intensity statins followed by add-on therapy with ezetimibe was simulated using a Monte Carlo model, the LDL-C target was reached in 19.9% using high-intensity statin monotherapy and in another 28.5% with high-intensity statins and ezetimibe, while 50.7% would still be eligible for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. When use of alirocumab or evolocumab was simulated in those who were eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors, around 90% of all patients attained the LDL-C target.ConclusionOur study suggests that, even with maximized use of high-intensity statins and ezetimibe, around half of patients with MI would be eligible for treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Considering the current cost of PCSK9 inhibitors, the financial implications of the new guidelines may be substantial.
| S-EPMC7654933 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In 2019 the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) lowered the target values for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from <1.8 mmol/L to <1.4 mmol/L for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to determine the clinical impact of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines on lipid-lowering therapies and achievement rates of LDL-C targets in a contemporary cohort of CAD patients participating in an ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program.We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Swiss Secondary Prevention Registry (SwissPR) in patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), who completed the ambulatory cardiovascular rehabilitation program (CR) of the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland from January 2017 to April 2021. To evaluate the impact of the guideline publication, the cohort was split into a pre-Guideline 2019 group (A) and a post-Guideline 2019 group (B). In total 1320 patients were screened leaving 875 patients for analysis. At discharge, more patients in group B were on maximal statin doses (20% vs. 9%, p < 0.0001) and on combination therapy with ezetimibe (51% vs. 17%, p < 0.0001) than in group A, which resulted in 53% of patients reaching the LDL-C target of <1.4 mmol/L in group B. Regression analysis revealed that dyslipidaemia and positive smoking history represent independent predictors for intensified lipid-lowering medication, whereas absolving CR after publication of the 2019 guidelines was the only significant predictor for reduced LDL-C at CR discharge. We found a significant difference in prescription rates of lipid-lowering medication, especially combination therapies and statin doses, after publication of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines resulting in an achievement rate of >50% of the LDL-C target <1.4 mmol/L in CAD patients participating in ambulatory CR.
| S-EPMC9740039 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsTo assess low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment target attainment among myocardial infarction (MI) patients according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) dyslipidaemia guidelines from 2011 (LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L or ≥50% LDL-C reduction) and 2016 (LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L and ≥50% LDL-C reduction).Methods and resultsUsing nationwide registers, we identified 44 890 patients aged 21-74 admitted for MI, 2013-17. We included those attending follow-up visits at 6-10 weeks (n = 25 466) and 12-14 months (n = 17 117) after the event. Most patients received high-intensity statin monotherapy [84.3% (6-10 weeks) and 69.0% (12-14 months)] or statins with ezetimibe (2.7% and 10.2%). The proportion of patients attaining the 2011 LDL-C target was 63.8% (6-10 weeks) and 63.5% (12-14 months). The corresponding numbers for the 2016 LDL-C target were 31.6% (6-10 weeks) and 31.5% (12-14 months). At the 6- to 10-week follow-up, 37% of those not attaining the 2011 LDL-C target and 48% of those not attaining the 2016 target had an LDL-C level that was ≥0.5 mmol/L from the target. When comparing LDL-C measurements performed before vs. after the release of the 2016 guidelines, attainment of the 2016 LDL-C target increased from 30.2% to 35.0% (6-10 weeks) and from 27.6% to 37.6% (12-14 months).ConclusionIn a nationwide register, one out of three patients with a recent MI had not attained the LDL-C target of the 2011 ESC/EAS guidelines and two out of three patients had not attained the LDL-C target of the 2016 guidelines.
| S-EPMC7834860 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe impact of the stepwise implementation of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) treatment algorithm on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment was simulated in patients from the DA VINCI study.MethodsMonte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate treatment optimisation scenarios, based on a patient's risk category: statin intensification (step 1), addition of ezetimibe (step 2), and addition of a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor (step 3). Residual cardiovascular risk and predicted relative and absolute risk reduction (RRR and ARR) in cardiovascular events were assessed.FindingsIn DA VINCI, 2482 patients did not achieve their 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C goals and were included in the simulation. In patients without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n = 962), 27.0% (n = 259) and 57.0% (n = 548) are likely to achieve their LDL-C goals at step 1 and step 2, respectively. Of those at very high risk without ASCVD (n = 74), 88.1% (n = 65) are likely to achieve their LDL-C goals at step 3. In patients with ASCVD (n = 1520), 12.0% (n = 183), 42.1% (n = 641) and 93.2% (n = 1416) are likely to achieve their LDL-C goals at steps 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In patients with and without ASCVD, treatment optimisation may result in mean simulated RRR of 24.0% and 17.7%, respectively, and ARR of 8.1% and 2.6%, respectively.InterpretationMost patients at high cardiovascular risk are unlikely to achieve LDL-C goals through statin optimisation and ezetimibe, and will require a PCSK9 inhibitor, leading to greater reduction in cardiovascular risk.FundingAmgen.
| S-EPMC10398584 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimWe compared the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the 2016 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines on prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) using different risk prediction models [US Pooled Cohort Equations (US-PCE for any ASCVD) and European Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation system (European-SCORE for fatal ASCVD)] and different statin eligibility criteria.Methods and resultsWe examined 44 889 individuals aged 40-75 recruited in 2003-09 in the Copenhagen General Population Study, all free of ASCVD, diabetes, and statin use at baseline. We detected 2217 any ASCVD events and 199 fatal ASCVD events through 2014. The predicted-to-observed event ratio was 1.2 using US-PCE for any ASCVD and 5.0 using European-SCORE for fatal ASCVD. The US-PCE, but not the European-SCORE, was well-calibrated around decision thresholds for statin therapy. For a Class I recommendation, 42% of individuals qualified for statins using the ACC/AHA guidelines vs. 6% with the ESC/EAS guidelines. Using ACC/AHA- vs. ESC/EAS-defined statin eligibility led to a substantial gain in sensitivity (+62% for any ASCVD and +76% for fatal ASCVD) with a smaller loss in specificity (-35% for any ASCVD and -36% for fatal ASCVD). Similar differences between the ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS guidelines were found for men and women separately, and for Class IIa recommendations. The sensitivity and specificity of a US-PCE risk of 5% were similar to those of a European-SCORE risk of 1.4%, whereas a US-PCE risk of 7.5% was similar to a European-SCORE risk of 2.4%.ConclusionsThe ACC/AHA guidelines were superior to the ESC/EAS guidelines for primary prevention of ASCVD, that is, for accurately assigning statin therapy to those who would benefit.
| S-EPMC5837499 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study assessed the proportion of risk-stratified Korean patients with dyslipidemia achieving their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets as defined by the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) (2011) guidelines while receiving lipid-modifying treatments (LMTs).MethodsIn this multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study, we evaluated data from Korean patients aged ≥19 years who were receiving LMTs for ≥3 months and had an LDL-C value within the previous 12 months on the same LMT. Data were collected for demographics, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, medical history, and healthcare consumption. Patients were risk-stratified according to the ESC Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) chart and LDL-C target achievement rate was assessed.ResultsGuideline-based risk-stratification of the 1,034 patients showed the majority (72.2%) to be in the very high-risk category. Investigators' assessment of risk was underestimated in 71.6% compared to ESC/EAS guidelines. Overall LDL-C target achievement rate was 44.3%; target achievement was the highest (66.0%) in moderate-risk patients and the lowest (39.0%) in very high-risk patients. Overall 97.1% patients were receiving statin therapy, mostly as a single-agent (89.2%). High-intensity statins and the highest permissible dose of high-intensity statins had been prescribed to only 9.1% and 7.3% patients in the very high-risk group, respectively. Physician satisfaction with patients' LDL-C levels was the primary reason for non-intensification of statin therapy.ConclusionAchievement of target LDL-C level is suboptimal in Korean patients with dyslipidemia, especially in those at very high-risk of CV events. Current practices in LMTs need to be improved based on precise CV risk evaluation posed by dyslipidemia.
| S-EPMC7386099 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundUnderstanding how statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9i (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 serine protease inhibitors) are prescribed after a myocardial infarction (MI) or elective coronary revascularization may improve lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) intensification and reduce recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. We described the use and intensification of LLT among US veterans who had a MI or elective coronary revascularization between July 24, 2015, and December 9, 2019, within 12 months of hospital discharge.MethodsLLT intensification was defined as increasing statin dose, or initiating a statin, ezetimibe, or a PCSK9i, overall and among those with an LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) ≥70 or 100 mg/dL. Poisson regression was used to determine patient characteristics associated with a greater likelihood of LLT intensification following hospitalization for MI or elective coronary revascularization.ResultsAmong 81 372 index events (mean age, 69.0 years, 2.3% female, mean LDL-C 89.6 mg/dL, 33.8% with LDL-C <70 mg/dL), 39.7% were not taking any LLT, and 22.0%, 37.2%, and 0.6% were taking a low-moderate intensity statin, a high-intensity statin, and ezetimibe, respectively, before MI/coronary revascularization during the study period. Within 14 days, 3 months, and 12 months posthospitalization, 33.3%, 41.9%, and 47.3%, respectively, of veterans received LLT intensification. LLT intensification was most common among veterans taking no LLT (82.5%, n=26 637) before MI/coronary revascularization. Higher baseline LDL-C, having a lipid test, and attending a cardiology visit were each associated with a greater likelihood of LLT intensification, while age ≥75 versus <65 years was associated with a lower likelihood of LLT intensification within 12 months posthospitalization.ConclusionsLess than half of veterans received LLT intensification in the year after MI or coronary revascularization suggesting a missed opportunity to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk.
| S-EPMC10680021 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) have recently published recommendations for the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin-9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in situations of very high risk. We aim to assess in the real world the suitability of PCSK9 inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes. We analyzed a prospective Swiss cohort of 2023 patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes between 2009 and 2014 with available data for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipid-lowering therapy at 1 year. Clinical familial hypercholesterolemia was defined using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network algorithm as unlikely, possible, probable, or definite. We simulated a fixed relative reduction of 24% in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels at 1 year in all patients not treated with ezetimibe, irrespective of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and statin regimen. At 1 year, 94.3% of patients were treated with statin, 5.8% with ezetimibe, and 35.8% of patients had on-target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (<1.8 mmol/L); 25.6% met criteria for possible or probable/definite familial hypercholesterolemia. After a simulation of the lipid-lowering effect of ezetimibe, the proportion of patients who would be eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors at 1 year was 13.4% using American College of Cardiology criteria and 2.7% using European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society criteria. Patients with possible or probable/definite familial hypercholesterolemia were more eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors compared with their non-familial hypercholesterolemia counterparts: 27.6% versus 8.8% according to American College of Cardiology criteria and 6.6% versus 1.8% according to European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society criteria (P<0.001). Recommendations made by the American College of Cardiology guidelines would lead to 5-fold higher eligibility rates for PCSK9 inhibitors compared to the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement in acute coronary syndrome patients.
| S-EPMC5721754 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background After the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, social isolation measures were introduced to contain infection. Although there is currently a slowing down of the infection, a reduction of hospitalizations, especially for myocardial infarction, was observed. The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of the infectious disease on ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, through the analysis of recent cases of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results Consecutive patients affected by STEMI from March 1 to 31, 2020, during social restrictions of Italian government, were collected and compared with patients with STEMI treated during March 2019. During March 2020, we observed a 63% reduction of patients with STEMI who were admitted to our catheterization laboratory, when compared with the same period of 2019 (13 versus 35 patients). Changes in all time components of STEMI care were notably observed, particularly for longer median time in symptom-to-first medical contact, spoke-to-hub, and the cumulative symptom-to-wire delay. Procedural data and in-hospital outcomes were similar between the 2 groups, whereas the length of hospitalization was longer in patients of 2020. In this group, we also observed higher levels of cardiac biomarkers and a worse left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline and discharge. Conclusions The coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak induced a reduction of hospital access for STEMI with an increase in treatment delay, longer hospitalization, higher levels of cardiac biomarkers, and worse left ventricular function.
| S-EPMC7792389 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPeriprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) may be particularly deleterious in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI). We sought to determine the rates and prognostic relevance of PMI using different definitions and biomarker thresholds after PCI for LMCAD in patients with recent MI.MethodsBetween January 2004 and December 2016, 442 patients underwent PCI for LMCAD at a median of 3 days after presentation with MI. A total of 350 patients presented with elevated cardiac biomarker levels (349 with serial creatine kinase-myocardial band [CK-MB] and 219 with serial cardiac troponin I (cTnI) values) that were stable or falling before the PCI. In this cohort, PMI within 48 hours of PCI was adjudicated using Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI), Academic Research Consortium 2 (ARC-2), and fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) criteria. The primary and secondary end points were 3-year rates of cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause death.ResultsAn incremental post-PCI rise in CK-MB starting at ≥10× the upper reference limit from baseline was significantly associated with 3-year CV death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 7.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.89-21.90), whereas CV death was not associated with any threshold elevation of cTnI. The frequencies of PMI according to the fourth UDMI, ARC-2, and SCAI definitions were 19.4%, 12.3%, and 8.6%, respectively. PMI by all 3 definitions was significantly associated with 3-year CV death, with the SCAI definition having the strongest relationship (aHR, 6.34; 95% CI, 2.47-16.27) compared with those of ARC-2 (aHR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.15-6.96) and fourth UDMI (aHR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.14-6.14).ConclusionsIn patients with recent MI undergoing PCI for LMCAD, an incremental elevation in postprocedural CK-MB of ≥10× the upper reference limit as a stand-alone measure was strongly predictive of 3-year CV and all-cause death, whereas no cTnI elevations of any level were prognostic. All 3 contemporary PMI definitions in widespread use were associated with 3-year mortality after PCI in this high-risk cohort, with the SCAI definition having the strongest relationship with subsequent death.
| S-EPMC11307394 | biostudies-literature