Dataset Information

Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

This systematic scoping review was conducted to 1) identify and describe labor curves that illustrate cervical dilatation over time; 2) map any evidence for, as well as outcomes used to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of the curves; and 3) identify areas in research that require further investigation.

Methods

A three-step systematic literature search was conducted for publications up to May 2023. We searched the Medline, Maternity & Infant Care, Embase, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, CINAHL, Scopus, and African Index Medicus databases for studies describing labor curves, assessing their effectiveness in improving birth outcomes, or assessing their accuracy as screening or diagnostic tools. Original research articles and systematic reviews were included. We excluded studies investigating adverse birth outcomes retrospectively, and those investigating the effect of analgesia-related interventions on labor progression. Study eligibility was assessed, and data were extracted from included studies using a piloted charting form. The findings are presented according to descriptive summaries created for the included studies.

Results and implications for research

Of 26,073 potentially eligible studies, 108 studies were included. Seventy-three studies described labor curves, of which ten of the thirteen largest were based mainly on the United States Consortium on Safe Labor cohort. Labor curve endpoints were 10 cm cervical dilatation in 69 studies and vaginal birth in 4 studies. Labor curve accuracy was assessed in 26 studies, of which all 15 published after 1986 were from low- and middle-income countries. Recent studies of labor curve accuracy in high-income countries are lacking. The effectiveness of labor curves was assessed in 13 studies, which failed to prove the superiority of any curve. Patient-reported health and well-being is an underrepresented outcome in evaluations of labor curves. The usefulness of labor curves is still a matter of debate, as studies have failed to prove their accuracy or effectiveness.

SUBMITTER: Huurnink JME

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10959354 | biostudies-literature | 2024

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review.

Huurnink Johanne Mamohau Egenberg JME Blix Ellen E Hals Elisabeth E Kaasen Anne A Bernitz Stine S Lavender Tina T Ahlberg Mia M Øian Pål P Høifødt Aase Irene AI Miltenburg Andrea Solnes AS Pay Aase Serine Devold ASD

PloS one 20240322 3

<h4>Objectives</h4>This systematic scoping review was conducted to 1) identify and describe labor curves that illustrate cervical dilatation over time; 2) map any evidence for, as well as outcomes used to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of the curves; and 3) identify areas in research that require further investigation.<h4>Methods</h4>A three-step systematic literature search was conducted for publications up to May 2023. We searched the Medline, Maternity & Infant Care, Embase, Cochrane ...[more]

PMID: 38517902

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of the World Health Organization (WHO) partograph alert line and other candidate predictors in the identification of women at risk of developing severe adverse birth outcomes.DesignA facility-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study.SettingThirteen maternity hospitals located in Nigeria and Uganda.PopulationA total of 9995 women with spontaneous onset of labour presenting at cervical dilatation of ≤6 cm or undergoing induction of labour.MethodsResearch assistants collected data on sociodemographic, anthropometric, obstetric, and medical characteristics of study participants at hospital admission, multiple assessments during labour, and interventions during labour and childbirth. The alert line and action line, intrapartum monitoring parameters, and customised labour curves were assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and the J statistic.OutcomesSevere adverse birth outcomes.ResultsThe rate of severe adverse birth outcomes was 2.2% (223 women with severe adverse birth outcomes), the rate of augmentation of labour was 35.1% (3506 women), and the caesarean section rate was 13.2% (1323 women). Forty-nine percent of women in labour crossed the alert line (4163/8489). All reference labour curves had a diagnostic odds ratio ranging from 1.29 to 1.60. The J statistic was less than 10% for all reference curves.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that labour is an extremely variable phenomenon, and the assessment of cervical dilatation over time is a poor predictor of severe adverse birth outcomes. The validity of a partograph alert line based on the 'one-centimetre per hour' rule should be re-evaluated.FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), and WHO (A65879).Tweetable abstractThe alert line in check: results from a WHO study.

Project description:BackgroundThe effects of diagnosing and treating labor dystocia with oxytocin infusion at different cervical dilatations have not been fully evaluated. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether cervical dilatation at diagnosis of dystocia and initiation of oxytocin infusion at different stages of cervical dilatation were associated with mode of birth, obstetric complications and women's birthing experience.MethodsA retrospective cohort study, including 588 nulliparous term women with spontaneous onset of labor and dystocia requiring oxytocin augmentation. The study population was divided into three groups according to cervical dilatation at diagnosis of dystocia and initiation of oxytocin-infusion (≤ 5 cm, 6-10 cm, fully dilated) with mode of birth as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were obstetrical and neonatal complications and women´s experience of childbirth. Statistical comparison between groups using Chi-square and ANOVA was performed. The risk of operative birth (cesarean section and instrumental birth) was assessed using binary logistic regression with suitable adjustments (maternal age, body mass index and risk assessment on admission to the labor ward).ResultsThe cesarean section rate differed between the groups (p < 0.001); 12% in the ≤ 5 cm group, 6% in the 6-10 cm group and 0% in the fully dilated group. There was no increased risk for operative birth in the ≤ 5 cm group compared to the 6-10 cm group, adjusted OR 1.28 95%CI (0.78-2.08). The fully dilated group had a decreased risk of operative birth (adjusted OR 0.48 95%CI (0.27-0.85). The rate of a negative birthing experience was high in all groups (28.5%, 19% and 18%) but was only increased among women in the ≤ 5 cm group compared with the 6-10 cm group, adjusted OR 1.76 95%CI (1.05-2.95).ConclusionsAlthough no difference in the risk of operative birth was found between the ≤ 5 cm and 6-10 cm cervical dilatation-groups, the cesarean section rate was highest in women with dystocia requiring oxytocin augmentation at ≤ 5 cm cervical dilatation. This might indicate that oxytocin augmentation before 6 cm cervical dilatation could be contra-productive in preventing cesarean sections. Further, the increased risk of negative birth experience in the ≤ 5 cm group should be kept in mind to improve labor care.

Project description:Interpreting the clinical consequences of genetic variants is the central problem in modern clinical genomics, for both hereditary diseases and oncology. However, clinical validation lags behind the pace of discovery, leading to distressing uncertainty for patients, physicians and researchers. This "interpretation gap" changes over time as evidence accumulates, and variants initially deemed of uncertain (VUS) significance may be subsequently reclassified in pathogenic/benign. We previously developed RENOVO, a random forest-based tool able to predict variant pathogenicity based on publicly available information from GnomAD and dbNFSP, and tested on variants that have changed their classification status over time. Here, we comprehensively evaluated the accuracy of RENOVO predictions on variants that have been reclassified over the last four years. we retrieved 16 retrospective instances of the ClinVar database, every 3 months since March 2020 to March 2024, and analyzed time trends of variant classifications. We identified variants that changed their status over time and compared RENOVO predictions generated in 2020 with the actual reclassifications. VUS have become the most represented class in ClinVar (44.97% vs. 9.75% (likely) pathogenic and 40,33% (likely) benign). The rate of VUS reclassification is linear and slow compared to the rate of VUS reporting, exponential and currently ~ 30x faster, creating a growing divide between what can be sequenced vs. what can be interpreted. Out of 10,196 VUS variants in January 2020 that have undergone a clinically meaningful reclassification to march 2024, RENOVO correctly classified 82.6% in 2020. In addition, RENOVO correctly identified the majority of the few variants that switched clinically meaningful classes (e.g., from benign to pathogenic and vice versa). We highlight variant classes and clinically relevant genes for which RENOVO provides particularly accurate estimates. In particularly, genes characterized by large prevalence of high- or low-impact variants (e.g., POLE, NOTCH1, FANCM etc.). Suboptimal RENOVO predictions mostly concern genes validated through dedicated consortia (e.g., BRCA1/2), in which RENOVO would anyway have a limited impact. Time trend analysis demonstrates that the current model of variant interpretation cannot keep up with variant discovery. Machine learning-based tools like RENOVO confirm high accuracy that can aid in clinical practice and research.

Project description:BackgroundThe call for women-centred approaches to reduce labour interventions, particularly primary caesarean section, has renewed an interest in gaining a better understanding of natural labour progression.ObjectiveTo synthesise available data on the cervical dilatation patterns during spontaneous labour of 'low-risk' women with normal perinatal outcomes.Search strategyPubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, POPLINE, Global Health Library, and reference lists of eligible studies.Selection criteriaObservational studies and other study designs.Data collection and analysisTwo authors extracted data on: maternal characteristics; labour interventions; the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre; and the duration of labour from dilatation at admission through to 10 cm. We pooled data across studies using weighted medians and employed the Bootstrap-t method to generate the corresponding confidence bounds.Main resultsSeven observational studies describing labour patterns for 99 971 women met our inclusion criteria. The median time to advance by 1 cm in nulliparous women was longer than 1 hour until a dilatation of 5 cm was reached, with markedly rapid progress after 6 cm. Similar labour progression patterns were observed in parous women. The 95th percentiles for both parity groups suggest that it was not uncommon for some women to reach 10 cm, despite dilatation rates that were much slower than the 1-cm/hour threshold for most part of their first stage of labours.ConclusionAn expectation of a minimum cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour throughout the first stage of labour is unrealistic for most healthy nulliparous and parous women. Our findings call into question the universal application of clinical standards that are conceptually based on an expectation of linear labour progress in all women.FundingUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).Tweetable abstractCervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour throughout labour is unrealistic for most women, regardless of parity.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:The molecular basis of failure to progress in labor is poorly understood. This study was undertaken to characterize the myometrial transcriptome of patients with an arrest of dilatation (AODIL). STUDY DESIGN:Human myometrium was prospectively collected from women in the following groups: (1) spontaneous term labor (TL; n=29) and (2) arrest of dilatation (AODIL; n=14). Gene expression was characterized using Illumina® HumanHT-12 microarrays. A moderated Student's t-test and false discovery rate adjustment were used for analysis. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) of selected genes was performed in an independent sample set. Pathway analysis was performed on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway database using Pathway Analysis with Down-weighting of Overlapping Genes (PADOG). The MetaCore knowledge base was also searched for pathway analysis. RESULTS:(1) Forty-two differentially expressed genes were identified in women with an AODIL; (2) gene ontology analysis indicated enrichment of biological processes, which included regulation of angiogenesis, response to hypoxia, inflammatory response, and chemokine-mediated signaling pathway. Enriched molecular functions included transcription repressor activity, heat shock protein (Hsp) 90 binding, and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity; (3) MetaCore analysis identified immune response chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) signaling, muscle contraction regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity in endothelial cells, and triiodothyronine and thyroxine signaling as significantly overrepresented (false discovery rate <0.05); (4) qRT-PCR confirmed the overexpression of Nitric oxide synthase 3 (NOS3); hypoxic ischemic factor 1A (HIF1A); Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2); angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4); ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1, motif 9 (ADAMTS9); G protein-coupled receptor 4 (GPR4); metallothionein 1A (MT1A); MT2A; and selectin E (SELE) in an AODIL. CONCLUSION:The myometrium of women with AODIL has a stereotypic transcriptome profile. This disorder has been associated with a pattern of gene expression involved in muscle contraction, an inflammatory response, and hypoxia. This is the first comprehensive and unbiased examination of the molecular basis of an AODIL.

Dataset Information

Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review.

Objectives

Methods

Results and implications for research

Publications

Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets