Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Retrograde Pull-through Approach with Double Guiding Catheters When Antegrade Left Ventricular Lead Implantation Is Infeasible.

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: Kasai Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10980892 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Retrograde Pull-through Approach with Double Guiding Catheters When Antegrade Left Ventricular Lead Implantation Is Infeasible.

Kasai Yuhei Y Morita Junji J Kitai Takayuki T Munakata Yumetsugu Y Suzuki Kota K Okada Takuya T Kasai Jungo J Fujita Tsutomu T

CJC open 20231119 3

PMID: 38559337

Similar Datasets

Simple Techniques for Antegrade Guiding Catheter Engagement after Retrograde CTO Crossing.

Project description:Interventional treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is nowadays counting on a wide span of procedural possibilities, and retrograde approaches are becoming more and more frequent as they warrant high success rates at the cost of a slightly higher incidence of donor vessel damage. Retrograde lesion crossing needs to be followed by procedural conversion to an antegrade approach to dilate and stent the lesion, and new techniques are being proposed to address this issue and achieve a safer recanalization of the vessel. In this context, we propose novel and simple techniques to antegrade guiding catheter engagement by the retrograde wire, enhancing the chances for procedural success.

| S-EPMC7271058 | biostudies-literature

Thoracoscopic Implantation of Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Project description:(1) Background: Limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of epicardial left ventricular (LV) lead placement using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). (2) Methods: Acute and post-discharge outcomes of CRT were compared between patients with epicardial LV leads (Epicardial-LV group, n = 13) and those with endocardial LV leads (Endocardial-LV group, n = 243). (3) Results: Epicardial LV leads were implanted via VATS alone (n = 8) or along with mini-thoracotomy (n = 5), for failed endocardial implantation (n = 11) or recurrent lead dislodgement (n = 2). All epicardial procedures under general anesthesia with one-lung ventilation were successfully completed in 1.0 ± 0.4 h without phrenic nerve stimulation. LV pacing thresholds in the epicardial-LV (1.5 ± 1.0 V) and endocardial-LV (1.3 ± 0.8 V) were comparable (p = 0.651). All patients were discharged alive post-VATS 8.8 ± 3.9 days. During the follow-up (34.3 ± 28.6 months), all patients with epicardial LV leads stayed alive except for one cardiac death post-CRT 14 months and one heart transplantation post-CRT 30 months. All epicardial LV leads maintained stable performance without dislodgement/significant changes in pacing threshold/impedance. LV lead dislodgement occurred only in endocardial-LV (7/243, 2.9%). Efficacy in both groups was comparable in terms of QRS narrowing, increase in LV ejection fraction, and survival free of cardiac death, or heart-failure-related hospitalization. (4) Conclusions: Epicardial LV lead placement using VATS can be a safe and effective alternative to endocardial implantation, with comparable acute and post-discharge outcomes achieved by both approaches.

| S-EPMC9145737 | biostudies-literature

A novel way to facilitate left ventricular lead implantation: Jailed catheter technique.

Project description:An important therapeutic modality for heart failure with left ventricular dyssynchrony, left ventricular lead placement, cannot be achieved due to anatomic challenges in some cases. In the current case, a novel implantation technique to overcome an anatomic difficulty, angled takeoff of the side branch of the coronary sinus, was presented.

| S-EPMC5891404 | biostudies-literature

Successful implantation of a left ventricular lead in an anomalous coronary sinus.

Project description:We describe the case of a 56-year-old man who was referred for CRT implantation and found to have anomalous CS. Catheterization of the CS initially failed due to this anomaly. However, a single large posterior-lateral branch with diminutive CS in the atrioventricular groove allowed for successful implantation of the LV lead.

| S-EPMC8339087 | biostudies-literature

Orthodromic and Antidromic Snare Techniques for Left Ventricular Lead Implantation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Project description:The snare technique can be used to overcome unsuitable cardiac venous anatomies for left ventricular (LV) lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) procedures. However, limited data exist regarding performance of the snare technique. We classified 262 patients undergoing CRT procedure into the snare (n = 20) or conventional group (n = 242) according to the LV lead implantation method. We compared the safety, efficacy, and composite outcome (all-cause death and heart failure readmission) at 3 years post-implant between the snare and conventional groups. In the snare group, all LV leads were implanted safely using orthodromic (n = 15) or antidromic (n = 5) techniques, and no immediate complications occurred including vessel perforation, tamponade, and lead dislodgement. During follow-up, LV lead threshold and impedance remained stable without requiring lead revision in the snare group. There were no significant between-group differences regarding LV ejection fraction increase (12 ± 13% vs. 12 ± 13%, p = 0.929) and LV end-systolic volume reduction (18 ± 48% vs. 28 ± 31%, p = 0.501). Both groups exhibited comparable CRT-response rates (62.5% vs. 60.6%, p = 1.000). The risk of primary outcome was not significantly different between the two groups (25.9% vs. 30.9%, p = 0.817). In patients who failed conventional LV lead implantation for CRT, the snare technique could be a safe and effective solution to overcome difficult coronary venous anatomy.

| S-EPMC9024966 | biostudies-literature

Left ventricular lead implantation using the crossover technique in a steeply bifurcated lateral branch.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10774574 | biostudies-literature

Direct visualization of an atrial transseptal left ventricular endocardial lead implantation within an isolated heart.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5426419 | biostudies-literature

Feasibility of intraprocedural integration of cardiac CT to guide left ventricular lead implantation for CRT upgrades.

Project description:BackgroundOptimal positioning of the left ventricular (LV) lead is an important determinant of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response.ObjectiveEvaluate the feasibility of intraprocedural integration of cardiac computed tomography (CT) to guide LV lead implantation for CRT upgrades.MethodsPatients undergoing LV lead upgrade underwent ECG-gated cardiac CT dyssynchrony and LV scar assessment. Target American Heart Association segment selection was determined using latest non-scarred mechanically activating segments overlaid onto real-time fluoroscopy with image co-registration to guide optimal LV lead implantation. Hemodynamic validation was performed using a pressure wire in the LV cavity (dP/dtmax) ).Results18 patients (male 94%, 55.6% ischemic cardiomyopathy) with RV pacing burden 60.0 ± 43.7% and mean QRS duration 154 ± 30 ms underwent cardiac CT. 10/10 ischemic patients had CT evidence of scar and these segments were excluded as targets. Seventeen out of 18 (94%) patients underwent successful LV lead implantation with delivery to the CT target segment in 15 out of 18 (83%) of patients. Acute hemodynamic response (dP/dtmax ≥ 10%) was superior with LV stimulation in CT target versus nontarget segments (83.3% vs. 25.0%; p = .012). Reverse remodeling at 6 months (LV end-systolic volume improvement ≥15%) occurred in 60% of subjects (4/8 [50.0%] ischemic cardiomyopathy vs. 5/7 [71.4%] nonischemic cardiomyopathy, p = .608).ConclusionIntraprocedural integration of cardiac CT to guide optimal LV lead placement is feasible with superior hemodynamics when pacing in CT target segments and favorable volumetric response rates, despite a high proportion of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Multicentre, randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate whether intraprocedural integration of cardiac CT is superior to standard care.

| S-EPMC8647921 | biostudies-literature

Percutaneous removal of broken left ventricular lead guide sheath during biventricular pacemaker implantation using intraluminal wire technique.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7749224 | biostudies-literature

A left ventricular lead implantation at the latest site based on four-dimensional computed tomography: a case report.

Project description:BackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) could be an effective therapy for patients suffering from severe heart failure (HF) despite optimal medical therapy. However, it has been reported that about 30% of patients receive ineffective results even if CRT has been performed. In a recent study, four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) was shown to be useful for pre-operative planning in transcatheter aortic valve intervention. The 4DCT is reconstructed with 10% increments over the cardiac cycle so that the displacement of the myocardium can be evaluated over time. From the above, we considered that the most delayed site where we would implant the left ventricular (LV) lead could be recognized by 4DCT.Case summaryA 55-year-old man with a recurrent admission for HF indicated for CRT was referred to our hospital. In this patient, the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) showed a relatively narrow QRS complex with a left bundle branch block pattern. An echocardiography demonstrated severe LV dysfunction. Although no dyssynchrony was detected, the LV lead was inserted into the most delayed site based on the 4DCT. Three-month later, the ejection fraction increased and the cardiothoracic ratio obviously shortened.DiscussionWe experienced a case in which we could evaluate the effective implantation site for the LV lead based on the 4DCT even though the effective site was not detected by echocardiography, and we could implant the LV lead at that effective site. The 4DCT may be useful for implanting LV leads in effective sites.

| S-EPMC7180524 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data