Infectious Disease Physician Availability and Postgraduate Antimicrobial Stewardship Education in Japan.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Miwa T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10980957 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Infectious Disease Physician Availability and Postgraduate Antimicrobial Stewardship Education in Japan.
Miwa Toshiki T Okamoto Koh K Nishizaki Yuji Y Tokuda Yasuharu Y
JAMA network open 20240304 3
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundAs nurse practitioners and physician assistants (APPs) become more prevalent in delivering pediatric care, their involvement in antimicrobial stewardship efforts increases in importance. This project aimed to create and assess the efficacy of a problem-based learning (PBL) approach to teaching APPs antimicrobial stewardship principles.MethodsA PBL education initiative was developed after communication with local APP leadership and focus group feedback. It was offered to all APPs associated with Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Participants completed a survey which assessed opinions on antimicrobial stewardship and included knowledge-based questions focused on antimicrobial stewardship. Prescriptions for skin and soft tissue infections associated with APPs were recorded via chart review before and after the education campaign.ResultsEighty APPs participated in the initial survey and teaching initiative with 44 filling out the 2-week follow-up and 29 filling out the 6-month follow-up. Subjective opinions of antimicrobial stewardship and comfort with basic principles of AS increased from pre-intervention. Correct responses to knowledge-based assessments increased from baseline after 2-week follow-up (p < 0.01) and were maintained at the 6-month follow-up (p = 0.03). Simple skin and soft tissue infection prescriptions for clindamycin went from 44.4% pre-intervention to 26.5% (p = 0.2) post-intervention.ConclusionsA PBL approach for APP education on antimicrobial stewardship can be effective in increasing knowledge and comfort with principles of antimicrobial stewardship. These changes are maintained in long-term follow-up. Changes in prescribing habits showed a strong trend towards recommended empiric therapy choice. Institutions should develop similar education campaigns for APPs.
| S-EPMC10644159 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionWhile several approaches have been described to teach antimicrobial stewardship (AS) practices, fewer have been aimed at infectious disease physicians. We developed a series of simulated AS meetings to train infectious disease fellows in the synthesis of AS interventions.MethodsThree simulated AS committee scenarios were developed. Background lectures were given 1 week prior to the simulation during which multidisciplinary roles were assigned. Precourse work included review of primary literature pertinent to the scenario. Simulations were conducted over 1.5 hours. Individual and team performances were evaluated. Pre- and postsurveys were collected from fellows and faculty members to assess the format.ResultsSix infectious disease fellows participated in the series. Fellows demonstrated information synthesis and improvements in individual and team performance. Eighty-three percent of fellows before the simulation series and 100% postseries reported educating others on AS principles in the previous month. Fellows were satisfied with the series and requested more scenarios. Eight faculty members completed surveys. Thirty-eight percent of faculty before the series and 63% after completion reported that fellows viewed antimicrobial preauthorization as useful or necessary. Faculty supported the format, found it useful in evaluation of learners, and perceived that fellows benefited from the approach.DiscussionSimulation is an effective and enjoyable way to train infectious disease fellows in AS and team utilization. Fellows demonstrated improvement in AS knowledge, skills, and attitudes and developed evidence-based interdisciplinary plans to solve AS challenges. Faculty also viewed this strategy as effective and sustainable.
| S-EPMC6342414 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10984567 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesWe reviewed the published literature on antimicrobial stewardship training in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education to determine which interventions have been implemented, the extent to which they have been evaluated, and to understand which are most effective.MethodsWe searched Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2016. Four thousand three hundred eighty-five (4385) articles were identified and underwent title and abstract review. Only those articles that addressed antimicrobial stewardship interventions for medical trainees were included in the final review. We employed Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation (reaction, learning, behaviour, results) to categorize intervention evaluations.ResultsOur review included 48 articles. The types of intervention varied widely amongst studies worldwide. Didactic teaching was used heavily in all settings, while student-specific feedback was used primarily in the postgraduate setting. The high-level evaluation was sparse, with 22.9% reporting a Kirkpatrick Level 3 evaluation; seventeen reported no evaluation. All but one article reported positive results from the intervention. No articles evaluated the impact of an intervention on undergraduate trainees' prescribing behaviour after graduation.ConclusionsThis study enhances our understanding of the extent of antimicrobial stewardship in the context of medical education. While our study demonstrates that medical schools are implementing antimicrobial stewardship interventions, rigorous evaluation of programs to determine whether such efforts are effective is lacking. We encourage more robust evaluation to establish effective, evidence-based approaches to training prescribers in light of the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance.
| S-EPMC5694692 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes are established across the world to treat infections efficiently, prioritize patient safety, and reduce the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. One of the core elements of AMS programmes is guidance to support and direct physicians in making efficient, safe and optimal decisions when prescribing antibiotics. To optimize and tailor AMS, we need a better understanding of prescribing physicians' experience with AMS guidance.ObjectivesTo explore the prescribing physicians' user experience, needs and targeted improvements of AMS guidance in hospital settings.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 36 prescribing physicians/AMS guidance users from hospital settings in Canada, Germany, Israel, Latvia, Norway and Sweden as a part of the international PILGRIM trial. A socioecological model was applied as an overarching conceptual framework for the study.ResultsResearch participants were seeking more AMS guidance than is currently available to them. The most important aspects and targets for improvement of AMS guidance were: (i) quality of guidelines; (ii) availability of infectious diseases specialists; and (iii) suitability of AMS guidance to department context.ConclusionsAchieving prudent antibiotic use not only depends on individual and collective levels of commitment to follow AMS guidance but also on the quality, availability and suitability of the guidance itself. More substantial commitment from stakeholders is needed to allocate the required resources for delivering high-quality, available and relevant AMS guidance to make sure that the prescribers' AMS needs are met.
| S-EPMC10939443 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is widely perceived as a threat to human and animal health and a significant One Health issue with extensive and complex factors contributing to its occurrence and spread. Previous studies have surveyed human and animal health professionals to determine their perceptions regarding AMR and antimicrobial use (AMU). There are limited studies exploring the understanding of veterinary students despite their critical role as future antimicrobial prescribers. A cross-sectional survey was administered to an entire cohort of Doctor of Veterinary Medicine Year 2 (DVM2) students (n = 136) to investigate their knowledge and perceptions regarding AMR and AMU prior to formal education on this issue. Ninety students (66.2% of the cohort) completed the survey. There was overwhelming agreement regarding the immediacy of the problem, with 84.4% of students indicating that 'We must take action on AMR'. Despite more than 94.4% of students correctly defining AMR, specific knowledge regarding AMR impact, contributory causes to AMR and strategies to solve the challenge of AMR was variable. Most students perceived livestock producers to have a significant role in the perpetuation of AMR due to AMU for prophylaxis (71.1% substantial/moderate contribution) and treatment (56.7% substantial/moderate contribution). Over a third of respondents (37.8%) were unsure if AMR could spread from animals to humans. Respondents perceived that various groups (dentists, doctors, veterinarians, professional organisations) are all important in ameliorating the issue of AMR. The implementation of restrictive measures to reduce veterinary prescription of antimicrobials was viewed as less important than strategies involving education, hygiene, surveillance, and guideline development/availability. To encourage the development of good antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practices, professional veterinary education needs to foster an understanding of the scientific, behavioural and social issues that contribute to AMR and inappropriate AMU, as well as prescribers' personal contribution to AMR perpetuation and amelioration.
| S-EPMC8719013 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In cancer patients, appropriate diagnosis and management of infection are frequently challenging owing to subtle or atypical presentation. We investigated the effectiveness of infectious disease (ID) consultations and the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) in a Japanese cancer center. This 36-month-period, single-institution, interrupted time series analysis was retrospectively conducted during April 1, 2018-March 31, 2021, to evaluate a two-phase intervention: Phase 1 (notification of antimicrobials by the infection control team) and Phase 2 (establishing an ID consultation service and implementing ASP). Among 32,202 patients hospitalized, 22,096 and 10,106 hospitalizations occurred at baseline and during intervention period, respectively. The Antimicrobial Stewardship Team (AST) provided feedback on specific broad-spectrum antimicrobials in 913 instances (347 appropriate [38%]; 566 inappropriate [62%]), and 440 ID consultations were completed, with a 75% overall acceptance rate for AST suggestions. In Phase 2, monthly carbapenem days of therapy (CAR-DOT) decreased significantly, and narrow-spectrum antibiotic usage increased significantly in both trend and level; monthly DOT of antipseudomonal agents decreased significantly in trend. The results of these analyses of antimicrobial use are consistent with the DOT-based data based on antimicrobial use density (AUD). The total number of inpatient specimens increased significantly; the trend of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections decreased, without changes in the incidence of other resistant organisms, all-cause in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. Actual and adjusted CAR purchase costs per patient-day decreased without significant changes in the actual and adjusted purchase cost per patient-day for all intravenous antimicrobials. Combining ID consultation and ASP reduced carbapenem use without negative patient outcomes. Their implementation could facilitate establishment of safe cancer treatment facilities in Japan and improve prognosis in cancer patients.
| S-EPMC8789186 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are increasingly implemented in hospital care. They aim to simultaneously optimize outcomes for individual patients with infections and reduce financial and health-associated costs of overuse of antibiotics. Few studies have examined the effects of antimicrobial stewardship programs in settings with low proportions of antimicrobial resistance, such as in Sweden. Methods. An antimicrobial stewardship program was introduced during 5 months of 2013 in a department of internal medicine in southern Sweden. The intervention consisted of audits twice weekly on all patients given antibiotic treatment. The intervention period was compared with a historical control consisting of patients treated with antibiotics in the same wards in 2012. Studied outcome variables included 28-day mortality and readmission, length of hospital stay, and use of antibiotics. Results. A reduction of 27% in total antibiotic use (2387 days of any antibiotic) was observed in the intervention period compared with the control period. The reduction was due to fewer patients started on antibiotics as well as to significantly shorter durations of antibiotic courses (P < .001). An earlier switch to oral therapy and a specific reduction in use of third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones was also evident. Mortality, total readmissions, and lengths of stay in hospital were unchanged compared with the control period, whereas readmissions due to a nonresolved infection were fewer during the intervention of 2013. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that an infectious disease specialist-guided antimicrobial stewardship program can profoundly reduce antibiotic use in a low-resistance setting with no negative effect on patient outcome.
| S-EPMC4567088 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Antimicrobial resistance is increasing; however, antimicrobial drug development is slowing. Now more than ever before, antimicrobial stewardship is of the utmost importance as a way to optimize the use of antimicrobials to prevent the development of resistance and improve patient outcomes. This review describes the why, what, who, how, when, and where of antimicrobial stewardship. Techniques of stewardship are summarized, and a plan for implementation of a stewardship program is outlined.
| S-EPMC3203003 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundInappropriate antimicrobial use is common in the outpatient setting but often goes unaddressed by stewardship education. Residents might benefit from directed stewardship education.ObjectiveWe conducted a needs assessment of resident knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding antibiotic use and stewardship in outpatient continuity clinics.MethodsInternal medicine (IM) residents with continuity clinic at Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System were eligible. Antimicrobial prescriptions and number of visits were extracted from the Computerized Patient Record System (July 1, 2017-March 31, 2018). Antimicrobial rate (prescriptions per 1000 visits) was calculated for each resident. Results from a resident survey that included demographics, attitudes, and case-based multiple-choice knowledge questions were linked by unique identifier to antimicrobial rate.ResultsPrescription and visit data were available for 37 residents. Mean monthly antimicrobial rate was 51 prescriptions per 1000 visits (range 8-239). Surveys were completed by 19 residents (51%). Respondents were 32% female, 32% interns, and 11% international medical graduates. An online resource was most commonly used for prescribing guidance, whereas lectures and small group sessions for residents were rated as the most helpful educational modalities. Many respondents reported being unprepared to perform basic tasks related to antimicrobial stewardship. Median percentage correct was 57% of case-based knowledge questions (interquartile range 50%-71%).ConclusionsAntimicrobial rates among IM residents at a VA outpatient continuity clinic are low and vary by provider. Residents agree with key antimicrobial stewardship concepts but lack preparation in tasks related to antimicrobial stewardship. Knowledge regarding antimicrobial prescribing was low.
| S-EPMC7450730 | biostudies-literature