Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Lung transplantation is one of the most common treatment options for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the choice between single and double lung transplantation for these patients remains a matter of debate. Therefore, we performed a systematic search of medical databases for studies on single lung transplantation, double lung transplantation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Methods
The rate ratio and hazard ratio of survival were analyzed. The meta-analysis included 15 case-control and retrospective registry studies.Results
The rate ratios of the 3-year survival (0.937 and P = 0.041) and 5-year survival (0.775 and P = 0.000) were lower for single lung transplantation than for double lung transplantation. However, the hazard ratio did not differ significantly between the two.Conclusions
Double lung transplantation was found to provide better benefits than single lung transplantation in terms of the long-term survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
SUBMITTER: Fang YC
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10981328 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Fang Yu-Chi YC Cheng Wen-Hsin WH Lu Hung-I HI Wang Yi-Shi YS Chuang Kai-Hao KH Lai Hsing-Hua HH Chen Yu Y Chen Li-Chun LC Tsai Meng-Yun MY Chang Yu-Ping YP Huang Kuo-Tung KT Lo Chien-Ming CM
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery 20240330 1
<h4>Background</h4>Lung transplantation is one of the most common treatment options for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the choice between single and double lung transplantation for these patients remains a matter of debate. Therefore, we performed a systematic search of medical databases for studies on single lung transplantation, double lung transplantation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.<h4>Methods</h4>The rate ratio and hazard ratio of surv ...[more]