Using computed tomogram atrial myocardial thickness maps in high‐power short‐duration radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation: UTMOST AF
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Hwang T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10995596 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:AimsWhether adjusting the duration of ablation based on left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) provides extra benefits for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is uncertain. We studied the safety and efficacy of tailored cryoballoon PV isolation (CB-PVI) based on LAWT for paroxysmal AF.Methods and resultsTwo hundred seventy-seven patients with paroxysmal AF refractory to anti-arrhythmic drug were randomized 1:1 to either LAWT-guided CB-PVI (n = 135) and empirical CB-PVI (n = 142). Empirical CB-PVI was performed using a 28 mm cryoballoon with recommended application for 240 s per ablation. Cryoapplication in the LAWT-guided group was titrated (additional application for 120 s at PVs, where >25% of the circumference includes segments with LAWT > 2.5 mm and reduced baseline application to 180 s at PVs where >75% of the circumference includes segments with LAWT < 1.5 mm) according to the computed tomography LAWT colour map. The primary endpoint was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of more than 30 s without antiarrhythmic medication, after a single ablation procedure. During a mean follow-up of 18.7 months, patients in the LAWT-guided CB-PVI group (70.8%) had a higher event-free rate from primary endpoint than those in the empirical CB-PVI group (54.4%; hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.99; P = 0.043). No differences were observed between the groups in complication rates (3.0% in LAWT-guided vs. 4.9% in empirical CB-PVI). The total procedure time was extended in the LAWT group than in the empirical group (mean 70.2 vs. 65.2 min, respectively).ConclusionThe LAWT-guided energy titration strategy improved freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence, compared with conventional strategy.
| S-EPMC11630070 | biostudies-literature
Project description:High-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation for the treatment of AF is emerging as an alternative to ablation using conventional ablation generator settings characterised by lower power and longer duration. Although the reported potential advantages of HPSD ablation include less tissue oedema and collateral tissue damage, a reduction in procedural time and superior ablation lesion formation, clinical studies of HPSD ablation validating these observations are limited. One of the main challenges for HPSD ablation has been the inability to adequately assess temperature and lesion formation in real time. Novel catheter designs may improve the accuracy of intra-ablation temperature recording and correspondingly may improve the safety profile of HPSD ablation. Clinical studies of HPSD ablation are on-going and interpretation of the data from these and other studies will be required to ascertain the clinical value of HPSD ablation.
| S-EPMC7358956 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10558058 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of rhythm-control therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). The very high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a novel technology that favors resistive heating while decreasing the role of conductive heating. Our study aimed to evaluate the correlations between contact force (CF), power, impedance drop (ID), and temperature; and to assess their role in lesion formation with the vHPSD technique.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent initial point-by-point RF catheter ablation for AF were enrolled in the study. The vHPSD ablation was performed applying 90 W for 4 s with an 8 ml/min irrigation rate.ResultsData from 85 patients [median age 65 (59-71) years, 34% female] were collected. The median procedure time, left atrial dwelling time, and fluoroscopy time were 70 (60-90) min, 49 (42-58) min, and 7 (5-11) min, respectively. The median RF time was 312 (237-365) sec. No steam pop nor major complications occurred. A total of 6,551 vHPSD RF points were analyzed. The median of CF, maximum temperature, and ID were 14 (10-21) g, 47.6 (45.1-50.4) °C, and 8 (6-10) Ohms, respectively. CF correlated significantly with the maximum temperature (p < 0.0001). A CF of 5 g and above was associated with a significantly higher temperature compared to those lesions with a CF below 5 grams (p < 0.0001). Bilateral first-pass isolation rate was 84%. The 6-month AF-recurrence rate was 7%.ConclusionThe maximum temperature and CF significantly correlate with each other during vHPSD applications. A CF ≥ 5 g leads to better tissue heating and thus might be more likely to result in good lesion formation, although this clinical study was unable to assess actual lesion sizes.
| S-EPMC9326019 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveHigh power short duration (HPSD) ablation strategy is proposed to be more effective than low power long duration (LPLD) for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Although small trials abound, data from a large cohort are lacking. This meta-analysis compares all the existing studies comparing these two approaches to evaluate perceived advantages of one over the other.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases identified studies comparing HPSD to LPLD ablation. All the analyses used the random-effects model.ResultsAblation settings varied widely across 20 studies comprising 2,136 patients who underwent HPSD and 1,753 patients who underwent LPLD. The pooled incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after HPSD ablation was 20% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.25; I2=88%]. Atrial arrhythmia recurrences were significantly less frequent with HPSD ablation (incidence risk ratio=0.66; 95% CI: 0.49-0.88; I2=72%; p=0.004). Procedural, fluoroscopy, and ablation times were significantly shorter with HPSD ablation. First-pass pulmonary vein isolations (PVIs) were significantly more [odds ratio (OR)=2.94; 95% CI: 1.50-5.77; I2=89%; p=0.002), and acute pulmonary vein reconnections (PVRs) were significantly lesser (OR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.28-0.62; I2=62%; p<0.001) in the HPSD group. Although radiofrequency energy was significantly higher, esophageal thermal injuries (ETI) were lower with HPSD ablation. Acute complications, including steam-pops, were rare and statistically similar in both the groups.ConclusionHPSD ablation enables faster first-pass PVI with fewer PVRs, similar ETI rates, rare collateral damage, and lower recurrence of atrial arrhythmia in the long term than LPLD. Randomized controlled studies with a larger cohort are indicated both to confirm the benefit of HPSD ablation and standardize the ablation protocol.
| S-EPMC8878944 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe comparative efficacy, saftey, and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters after pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon (Cryo-PVI), high-power short-duration (HPSD-PVI), and conventional radiofrequency ablation (conventional-PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear.Materials and methodsIn this propensity score-weighted, retrospective analysis of a single-center cohort, we analyzed 3,395 patients (26.2% female, 74.5% paroxysmal AF) who underwent AF catheter ablation without an empirical left atrial ablation. Procedural factors, recurrence rates, complication rates, and the post-procedural HRV parameters were compared across the Cryo-PVI (n = 625), HPSD-PVI (n = 748), and conventional-PVI (n = 2,022) groups.ResultsDespite the shortest procedural time in the Cryo-PVI group (74 min for Cryo-PVI vs. 104 min for HPSD-PVI vs. 153 min for conventional-PVI, p < 0.001), the major complication (p = 0.906) and clinical recurrence rates were similar across the three ablation groups (weighted log-rank, p = 0.824). However, the Cryo-PVI group was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent AF in patients with paroxysmal AF [weighted hazard ratio (WHR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.86], whereas it was associated with a higher risk of recurrent AF in patients with persistent AF (WHR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.89, p for interaction of <0.001) compared with the conventional-PVI group. In the subgroup analysis for the HRV, the Cryo-PVI group had the highest low-frequency-to-high-frequency ratio at 1-year post-procedure, whereas the HPSD-PVI group had the lowest low-frequency-to-high-frequency ratio at 1-year post-procedure (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe Cryo-PVI group had better rhythm outcomes in patients with paroxysmal AF but worse rhythm outcomes in patients with persistent AF and a higher long-term post-procedural sympathetic nervous activity and sympatho-vagal balance compared with the conventional-PVI group.
| S-EPMC10590885 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHigh power shorter duration (HPSD) ablation seen to increase efficacy and safety treating of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, comparative data between HPSD and low power longer duration (LPLD) ablation are limited.HypothesisWe thought that HPSD might bring more clinical benefits. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical benefits of HPSD in patients with AF.MethodsThe Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing HPSD and LPLD ablation.ResultsTen trials with 2467 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled analyses demonstrated that HPSD showed a benefit of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (risk ratio [RR]: 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.31, P < .001) and recurrence of atrial arrhythmias (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.91, P = .005). Additionally, HPSD could reduce procedural time (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -42.93; 95% CI, -58.10 to -27.75, P < .001), ablation time (WMD: -21.01; 95% CI: -24.55 to -17.47, P < .001), and fluoroscopy time (WMD: -4.11; 95% CI: -6.78 to -1.45, P < .001). Moreover, major complications and esophageal thermal injury (ETI) were similar between two groups (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.44-1.30, P = .31) and (RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.21-1.51, P = .26).ConclusionsHPSD was safe and efficient for treating AF. Compared with LPLD, HPSD was associated with advantages of procedural features, higher first-pass PVI and reducing recurrence of atrial arrhythmias. Moreover, major complications and ETI were similar between two groups.
| S-EPMC7724222 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction: Whereas, high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation is generally used in atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA), its efficacy, safety, and influence on autonomic function have not been well established in a large population. This study compared HPSD-AFCA and conventional power (ConvP)-AFCA in propensity score matched-population. Methods: In 3,045 consecutive patients who underwent AFCA, this study included 1,260 patients (73.9% male, 59 ± 10 years old, 58.2% paroxysmal type) after propensity score matching: 315 in 50~60W HPSD group vs. 945 in the ConvP group. This study investigated the procedural factors, complication rate, rhythm status, and 3-month heart rate variability (HRV) between the two groups and subgroups. Results: Procedure time was considerably short in the HPSD group (135 min in HPSD vs. 181 min in ConvP, p < 0.001) compared to ConvP group, but there was no significant difference in the complication rate (2.9% in HPSD vs. 3.7% in ConvP, p = 0.477) and the 3-month HRV between the two groups. At the one-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in rhythm outcomes between the two groups (Overall, Log-rank p = 0.885; anti-arrhythmic drug free, Log-rank p = 0.673). These efficacy and safety outcomes were consistently similar irrespective of the AF type or ablation lesion set. The Cox regression analysis showed that the left atrium volume index estimated by computed tomography (HR 1.01 [1.00-1.02]), p = 0.003) and extra-pulmonary vein triggers (HR 1.59 [1.03-2.44], p = 0.036) were independently associated with one-year clinical recurrence, whereas the HPSD ablation was not (HR 1.03 [0.73-1.44], p = 0.887). Conclusion: HPSD-AFCA notably reduced the procedure time with similar rhythm outcomes, complication rate, and influence on autonomic function as ConvP-AFCA, irrespective of the AF type or ablation lesion set.
| S-EPMC8530188 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly performed electrophysiological procedure. To improve healthcare utilization, we aimed to compare the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of a minimalistic, streamlined single catheter ablation approach using a high-power short-duration ablation index-guided protocol (HPSD) vs. a control single-catheter protocol (SP).MethodsPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a single transseptal puncture without a multipolar mapping catheter was performed in 91 patients. Left atrial mapping was performed with the ablation catheter, only. Pacing maneuvers were used to confirm exit block. Procedural characteristics and success rates were compared using HPSD (n = 34) vs. a control (n = 57) ablation protocol. Freedom from recurrence was defined as a 1-year absence of AF episodes > 30 s, beyond the 3-month blanking period.ResultsUsing the HPSD protocol the median procedure and RF ablation time were significantly shorter compared to the SP, 84 (IQR 76-100) vs. 118 min (IQR 104-141) and 1036 (898-1184) vs. 1949s (IQR 1693-2261), respectively, p < .001 for all. First-pass PVI was achieved using the HPSD protocol in 88% and using the SP in 87% of patients, p = 1.0. No procedural complications were observed. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels were significantly higher in patients using the HPSD protocol compared to the SP. At 12 months follow-up, 87% patients remained free from AF with no differences between groups.ConclusionsA minimalistic, HPSD ablation index-guided PVI with a single-catheter approach is very efficient, safe, and associated with excellent clinical outcomes at 1 year.
| S-EPMC9726791 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is achievable and effective using radiofrequency (RF) catheter (CA) or cryoballoon (CB) ablation. The newly introduced high RF-power short-duration ablation (HPSD) technique has shown promising results. Data comparing HPSD- to CB-PVI is sparse. We sought to investigate success rates and procedural differences of HPSD-PVI vs. CB-PVI in patients undergoing ablation for PAF and persAF.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing de novo PVI (HPSD or CB) were included. A power setting of 70W/7 s (70W/5 s at posterior wall) using a flexible tip catheter with enhanced irrigation was considered as true HPSD. Follow-up consisted of out-clinic pts visits, tele-consultation, 48-h Holter ECG, app-based telemonitoring and cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) interrogation.Results721 patients (46 HPSD, 675 CB) were analyzed. In all HPSD (27 persAF [59%]) and CB patients (423 persAF [63%]), PVI was successfully achieved. Procedure duration was significantly longer for HPSD (91 ± 19 min vs. 72 ± 18 min, p < 0.01). Ablation time was similar in both groups (HPSD: 44 ± 19 min vs. CB: 40 ± 17 min; p = 0.347). No major complications occurred in HPSD. For CB-PVI, in 25 (3.7%; p = 0.296) patients, complications occurred. At a follow-up of 290 ± 135 days, arrhythmia-free survival using HPSD was non-inferior to CB-PVI in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p = 0.096).ConclusionPVI using HPSD is equally effective and safe to CB-PVI. This analysis revealed a similar arrhythmia-free survival after HPSD and CB with low complication rates. Procedure duration for CB was significantly shorter while LA dwell time excluding mapping was equal. Currently, a prospective trial is conducted to corroborate these findings.
| S-EPMC10241727 | biostudies-literature