Dataset Information

Predictive value of admission D-dimer levels in patient with acute ischaemic stroke and COVID-19: a second-wave prospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of admission D-dimer levels for in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 and acute ischaemic stroke.

Design

Cohort (prospective).

Setting

Tertiary referral hospital in the capital city of Indonesia conducted from June to December 2021.

Participants

60 patients with acute ischaemic stroke and COVID-19 were included. Patients were classified into D-dimer groups (low and high) according to a 2 110 ng/mL cut-off value, determined via receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with admission D-dimer levels as the major predictor. Secondary outcomes included associations between other demographic and clinical variables and the admission D-dimer value. Kaplan-Meier method was used to carry out survival analysis, with univariable and multivariable Cox regression performed to assess the association of D-dimer levels and other confounding variables (including demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters) with in-hospital mortality.

Results

The findings demonstrated an association between elevated admission D-dimer levels (≥2 110 ng/mL) and an increased likelihood of death during hospitalisation. The adjusted HR was 14.054 (95% CI 1.710 to 115.519; p=0.014), demonstrating an increase in mortality risk after accounting for confounders such as age and diabetes history. Other significant predictors of mortality included a history of diabetes and increased white blood cell count.

Conclusions

Admission D-dimer levels may be a useful predictive indicator for the likelihood of death during hospitalisation in individuals with COVID-19 and acute ischaemic stroke.

SUBMITTER: Rasyid A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11002405 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Predictive value of admission D-dimer levels in patient with acute ischaemic stroke and COVID-19: a second-wave prospective cohort study.

Rasyid Al A Harris Salim S Kurniawan Mohammad M Mesiano Taufik T Hidayat Rakhmad R Wiyarta Elvan E

BMJ open 20240405 4

<h4>Objectives</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of admission D-dimer levels for in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 and acute ischaemic stroke.<h4>Design</h4>Cohort (prospective).<h4>Setting</h4>Tertiary referral hospital in the capital city of Indonesia conducted from June to December 2021.<h4>Participants</h4>60 patients with acute ischaemic stroke and COVID-19 were included. Patients were classified into D-dimer groups (low and high) according to a 2 110 ng/mL ...[more]

PMID: 38580372

Similar Datasets

Project description:The neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio has emerged as a possible prognostic biomarker in different medical conditions. Nonetheless, the predictive potential of neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio in determining the 3-month prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke patients who undergo intravenous thrombolysis has yet to be fully acknowledged. In this study, 196 acute ischaemic stroke patients with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and 133 healthy controls were included. Meanwhile, we incorporated a total of 386 non-thrombolytic acute ischaemic stroke patients. The acute ischaemic stroke patients with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator were divided into four groups based on quartiles of neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio. The association between neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio and the 3-month prognosis was evaluated through univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the predictive value of neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio in different patient populations. Adverse outcomes were defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6. The study findings revealed a significant association between elevated neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio levels and poor prognosis in acute ischaemic stroke patients. In the highest quartile of neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio levels (Q4), after controlling for age, gender, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, blood urea nitrogen and stroke subtypes, the odds ratio for adverse outcomes at 3 months was 13.314 (95% confidence interval: 2.878-61.596, P = 0.001). An elevated neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio value was found to be associated with a poor prognosis in acute ischaemic stroke patients, regardless of whether they received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment or not. The new model, which incorporating neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio into the conventional model, demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in discriminatory power and risk reclassification for 3-month poor outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. The new model exhibited a categorical net reclassification index (P = 0.035) of 12.9% and an integrated discrimination improvement (P = 0.013) of 5.2%. Subgroup analyses indicated that the predictive value of neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio differed across stroke subtypes. Neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio is a potential biomarker for predicting the prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke patients. The clinical implications of our findings are significant, as early identification and intervention in high-risk patients can improve their outcomes. However, further studies are required to validate our results and elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the association between neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio and poor prognosis in acute ischaemic stroke patients.

Project description:Background and purposeWe aimed to assess the association of diabetes mellitus (DM) and admission hyperglycaemia (AH), respectively, and outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) in daily clinical practice.MethodsConsecutive EVT patients admitted to our stroke centre between February 2015 and April 2020 were included in this observational cohort study. Patients with versus without DM and with versus without AH (glucose ≥ 7.8 mmol/L) were compared.ResultsWe included 1020 patients (48.9% women, median age = 73.1 years); 282 (27.6%) had DM, and 226 (22.2%) had AH. Patients with versus without DM less often showed successful reperfusion (odds ratio [OR]adjusted = 0.61, p = 0.023) and worse 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] = 0-2: 31.3% vs. 48%, ORadjusted = 0.59, p = 0.004; death: 38.9% vs. 24.1%, ORadjusted = 1.75, p = 0.002; mRS shift: padjusted < 0.0001; if moderate/good collaterals and mismatch, mRS = 0-2: ORadjusted = 0.52, p = 0.005; death: ORadjusted = 1.95, p = 0.005). If analysis was additionally adjusted for AH, only mRS shift was still significantly worse in patients with DM (padjusted = 0.012). Patients with versus without AH showed similar successful reperfusion rates and worse 3-month functional outcome (mRS = 0-2: 28.3% vs. 50.4%, ORadjusted = 0.52, p < 0.0001; death: 40.4% vs. 22.4%, ORadjusted = 1.80, p = 0.001; mRS shift: padjusted < 0.0001; if moderate/good collaterals and mismatch, mRS = 0-2: ORadjusted = 0.38, p < 0.0001; death: ORadjusted = 2.39, p < 0.0001). If analysis was additionally adjusted for DM, 3-month functional outcome remained significantly worse in patients with AH (mRS = 0-2: ORadjusted = 0.58, p = 0.004; death: ORadjusted = 1.57, p = 0.014; mRS shift: padjusted = 0.004). DM independently predicted recurrent/progressive in-hospital ischaemic stroke (OR = 1.71, p = 0.043) together with admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (OR = 0.95, p = 0.005), and AH independently predicted in-hospital symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (OR = 2.21, p = 0.001). The association of admission continuous glucose levels and most outcome variables was (inversely) J-shaped.ConclusionsHyperglycaemia more than DM was associated with worse 3-month outcome in the patients studied, more likely so in the case of moderate/good collaterals and mismatch in admission imaging.

Project description:ObjectiveWe report on: (1) the proportion of patients with known atrial fibrillation (AF); and (2) demographic, clinical or radiological differences between patients with known AF (and not treated) and patients with newly diagnosed AF, in a cohort of patients who presented with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) not previously treated with anticoagulation.DesignWe reviewed cross-sectional baseline demographic and clinical data from a prospective observational cohort study, (CROMIS-2).SettingPatients were recruited from 79 hospital stroke centres throughout the UK and one centre in the Netherlands.ParticipantsPatients were eligible if they were adults who presented with ischaemic stroke or TIA and AF and had not been previously treated with oral anticoagulation.Main outcome measuresProportion of patients with known AF before index ischaemic stroke or TIA from a cohort of patients who have not been previously treated with oral anticoagulation. Secondary analysis includes the comparison of CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores and other demographics and risk factors between those with newly diagnosed AF and those with previously known AF.ResultsOf 1470 patients included in the analysis (mean age 76 years (SD 10)), 622 (42%) were female; 999 (68%) patients had newly diagnosed AF and 471 (32%) patients had known AF. Of the 471 patients with known AF, 68% had a strong indication for anticoagulation and 89% should have been considered for anticoagulation based upon CHA2DS2-VASc score. Patients with known AF were more likely to have a prior history of dementia (4% vs 2%, p=0.02) and had higher HAS-BLED scores (median 3 vs 2). CHA2DS2-VASc, other risk factors and demographics were similar.ConclusionsAbout 1/3 of patients who present with stroke and have AF who have not been treated with oral anticoagulation have previously known AF. Of these patients, at least 68% were not adequately treated with oral anticoagulation.Trial registration numberNCT02513316.

Project description:BackgroundNeutrophil serine proteinases (NSPs), released by activated neutrophils, are key proteins involved in the pathophysiologic processes of stroke. NSPs are also implicated in the process and response of thrombolysis. This study aimed to analyze three NSPs (neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G, and proteinase 3) in relation to acute ischemic stroke (AIS) outcomes and in relation to the outcomes of patients treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-rtPA).MethodsAmong 736 patients prospectively recruited at the stroke center from 2018 to 2019, 342 patients diagnosed with confirmed AIS were included. Plasma neutrophil elastase (NE), cathepsin G (CTSG), and proteinase 3 (PR3) concentrations were measured on admission. The primary endpoint was unfavorable outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale score 3-6 at 3 months, and the secondary endpoints were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 h, and mortality within 3 months. In the subgroup of patients who received IV-rtPA, post-thrombolysis early neurological improvement (ENI) (defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score = 0 or decrease of ≥ 4 within 24 h after thrombolysis) was also included as the secondary endpoint. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between NSPs levels and AIS outcomes.ResultsHigher NE and PR3 plasma levels were associated with the 3-month mortality and 3-month unfavorable outcome. Higher NE plasma levels were also associated with the risk of sICH after AIS. After adjusting for potential confounders, plasma NE level > 229.56 ng/mL (odds ratio [OR] = 4.478 [2.344-8.554]) and PR3 > 388.77 ng/mL (OR = 2.805 [1.504-5.231]) independently predicted the 3-month unfavorable outcome. Regarding rtPA treatment, patients with NE plasma concentration > 177.22 ng/mL (OR = 8.931 [2.330-34.238]) or PR3 > 388.77 ng/mL (OR = 4.275 [1.045-17.491]) were over 4 times more likely to suffer unfavorable outcomes after rtPA treatment. The addition of NE and PR3 to clinical predictors of unfavorable functional outcome after AIS and the outcome after rtPA treatment improved discrimination as well as reclassification (integrated discrimination improvement = 8.2% and 18.1%, continuous net reclassification improvement = 100.0% and 91.8%, respectively).ConclusionsPlasma NE and PR3 are novel and independent predictors of 3-month functional outcomes after AIS. Plasma NE and PR3 also possess predictive value to identify patients with unfavorable outcomes after rtPA treatment. NE is probably an important mediator of the effects of neutrophils on stroke outcomes, which worth further investigation.

Dataset Information

Predictive value of admission D-dimer levels in patient with acute ischaemic stroke and COVID-19: a second-wave prospective cohort study.

Objectives

Design

Setting

Participants

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Predictive value of admission D-dimer levels in patient with acute ischaemic stroke and COVID-19: a second-wave prospective cohort study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets