Dataset Information

Potential value of a rapid syndromic multiplex PCR for the diagnosis of native and prosthetic joint infections: a real-world evidence study.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: The BIOFIRE Joint Infection (JI) Panel is a diagnostic tool that uses multiplex-PCR testing to detect microorganisms in synovial fluid specimens from patients suspected of having septic arthritis (SA) on native joints or prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Methods: A study was conducted across 34 clinical sites in 19 European and Middle Eastern countries from March 2021 to June 2022 to assess the effectiveness of the BIOFIRE JI Panel. Results: A total of 1527 samples were collected from patients suspected of SA or PJI, with an overall agreement of 88.4 % and 85 % respectively between the JI Panel and synovial fluid cultures (SFCs). The JI Panel detected more positive samples and microorganisms than SFC, with a notable difference on Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus species, Enterococcus faecalis, Kingella kingae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and anaerobic bacteria. The study found that the BIOFIRE JI Panel has a high utility in the real-world clinical setting for suspected SA and PJI, providing diagnostic results in approximately 1 h. The user experience was positive, implying a potential benefit of rapidity of results' turnover in optimising patient management strategies. Conclusion: The study suggests that the BIOFIRE JI Panel could potentially optimise patient management and antimicrobial therapy, thus highlighting its importance in the clinical setting.

SUBMITTER: Pascual S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11002912 | biostudies-literature | 2024

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Potential value of a rapid syndromic multiplex PCR for the diagnosis of native and prosthetic joint infections: a real-world evidence study.

Pascual Stéphanie S Noble Brooklyn B Ahmad-Saeed Nusreen N Aldridge Catherine C Ambretti Simone S Amit Sharon S Annett Rachel R O'Shea Shaan Ashk SA Barbui Anna Maria AM Barlow Gavin G Barrett Lucinda L Berth Mario M Bondi Alessandro A Boran Nicola N Boyd Sara E SE Chaves Catarina C Clauss Martin M Davies Peter P Dianzo-Delgado Ileana T IT Esteban Jaime J Fuchs Stefan S Friis-Hansen Lennart L Goldenberger Daniel D Golle Andrej A Groonroos Juha O JO Hoffmann Ines I Hoffmann Tomer T Hughes Harriet H Ivanova Marina M Jezek Peter P Jones Gwennan G Ceren Karahan Zeynep Z Lass-Flörl Cornelia C Laurent Frédéric F Leach Laura L Horsbøll Pedersen Matilde Lee ML Loiez Caroline C Lynch Maureen M Maloney Robert J RJ Marsh Martin M Milburn Olivia O Mitchell Shanine S Moore Luke S P LSP Moffat Lynn L Murdjeva Marianna M Murphy Michael E ME Nayar Deepa D Nigrisoli Giacomo G O'Sullivan Fionnuala F Öz Büşra B Peach Teresa T Petridou Christina C Prinz Mojgan M Rak Mitja M Reidy Niamh N Rossolini Gian Maria GM Roux Anne-Laure AL Ruiz-Garbajosa Patricia P Saeed Kordo K Salar-Vidal Llanos L Salas Venero Carlos C Selvaratnam Mathyruban M Senneville Eric E Starzengruber Peter P Talbot Ben B Taylor Vanessa V Trebše Rihard R Wearmouth Deborah D Willinger Birgit B Wouthuyzen-Bakker Marjan M Couturier Brianne B Allantaz Florence F

Journal of bone and joint infection 20240228 1

Introduction: The BIOFIRE Joint Infection (JI) Panel is a diagnostic tool that uses multiplex-PCR testing to detect microorganisms in synovial fluid specimens from patients suspected of having septic arthritis (SA) on native joints or prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Methods: A study was conducted across 34 clinical sites in 19 European and Middle Eastern countries from March 2021 to June 2022 to assess the effectiveness of the BIOFIRE JI Panel. Results: A total of 1527 s ...[more]

PMID: 38601005

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the usefulness of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections in the routine setting of a clinical microbiology laboratory, with a special focus on patients at high risk of culture-negative infections and high suspicion of infection.MethodsThe results obtained in the routine care setting with the use of the commercial multiplex PCR (Unyvero i60©, Curetis AG, Holzgerlingen, Germany) were retrospectively reviewed. The test was performed in samples of patients with suspected prosthetic joint infection, which were also processed for conventional diagnostic methods, including sonication of the implant when possible. Patients selected for the test were those with negative cultures after a 24-h incubation period.ResultsNinety-nine PCRs were performed, 57 of which were diagnostic of infection according to 2018 MSIS criteria. Nine patients received antibiotics within the 15 days prior to the diagnostic procedure. Tested samples included synovial fluid (33), sonication fluid (56) and tissue biopsies (10). The PCR test detected microorganisms in 26 samples: including two cases of polymicrobial infection. Eleven patients were diagnosed by using PCR only. The most frequently detected microorganism in PCR was Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus in 11 samples, followed by Staphylococcus aureus in five. One sample was positive for the bacteria universal primer, included in the 2.0 version of the kit. Only one discrepancy was detected between a negative PCR and a positive culture. One sample was also positive for a resistance marker (detection of mecA gene in a case of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection).ConclusionThe incorporation of the Unyvero ITI multiple PCR technique in patients selected by clinical experts is a useful tool for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections in a routine care setting. A close clinical-microbiological collaboration improves the usefulness of this kit for the management of patients with these infections.

Project description:BACKGROUND:A major obstacle for the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the identification of the underlying causative organism. While the diagnostic criteria ruling PJI in or out have become ever more accurate, the detection of the causative pathogen(s) still relies mostly on conventional and time-consuming microbial culture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a second-generation multiplex PCR assay (Unyvero ITI G2, Curetis AG, Holzgerlingen, Germany) used on synovial fluid specimens. Our hypothesis was that the method would yield a higher diagnostic accuracy in the pre-operative workup than synovial fluid culture. Thus, a more precise classification of septic and aseptic prosthesis failure could be achieved before revision surgery. METHODS:Prospectively collected frozen joint fluid specimens from 26 patients undergoing arthroplasty revision surgery of the hip or knee were tested as per the manufacturer's protocol. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios with corresponding confidence intervals were estimated using the statistical software R. A combination of the serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level, leukocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, joint fluid culture, tissue biopsy culture, and tissue biopsy histology served as the gold standard. RESULTS:Of the 26 patients included in the study, 15 were infected and 11 were aseptic. Conventional joint fluid culture showed a sensitivity of 0.67 and a specificity of 0.91. Joint fluid multiplex PCR yielded a sensitivity of 0.8 and a specificity of 1.0. CONCLUSIONS:Using the second-generation Unyvero ITI cartridge on joint fluid aspirate for the detection of prosthetic joint infection, we were able to achieve a higher diagnostic accuracy than with conventional culture. We conclude that to improve pathogen detection before revision surgery, this method represents a valuable and practicable tool.

Project description:Current microbial diagnostics for pleural infections are insufficient. Studies using 16S targeted next-generation sequencing report that only 10%-16% of bacteria present are cultured and that 50%-78% of pleural fluids containing relevant microbial DNA remain culture negative. As a rapid diagnostic alternative suitable for clinical laboratories, we wanted to explore a PCR-based approach. Based on the identification of key pathogens, we developed a syndromic PCR panel for community-acquired pleural infections (CAPIs). This was a pragmatic PCR panel, meaning that it was not designed for detecting all possibly involved bacterial species but for confirming the diagnosis of CAPI, and for detecting bacteria that might influence choice of antimicrobial treatment. We evaluated the PCR panel on 109 confirmed CAPIs previously characterized using culture and 16S targeted next-generation sequencing. The PCR secured the diagnosis of CAPI in 107/109 (98.2%) and detected all present pathogens in 69/109 (63.3%). Culture secured the diagnosis in 54/109 (49.5%) and detected all pathogens in 31/109 (28.4%). Corresponding results for 16S targeted next-generation sequencing were 109/109 (100%) and 98/109 (89.9%). For bacterial species included in the PCR panel, PCR had a sensitivity of 99.5% (184/185), culture of 21.6% (40/185), and 16S targeted next-generation sequencing of 92.4% (171/185). None of the bacterial species present not covered by the PCR panel were judged to impact antimicrobial therapy. A syndromic PCR panel represents a rapid and sensitive alternative to current diagnostic approaches for the microbiological diagnosis of CAPI.IMPORTANCEPleural empyema is a severe infection with high mortality and increasing incidence. Long hospital admissions and long courses of antimicrobial treatment drive healthcare and ecological costs. Current methods for microbiological diagnostics of pleural infections are inadequate. Recent studies using 16S targeted next-generation sequencing as a reference standard find culture to recover only 10%-16% of bacteria present and that 50%-78% of samples containing relevant bacterial DNA remain culture negative. To confirm the diagnosis of pleural infection and define optimal antimicrobial therapy while limiting unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, there is a need for rapid and sensitive diagnostic approaches. PCR is a rapid method well suited for clinical laboratories. In this paper we show that a novel syndromic PCR panel can secure the diagnosis of pleural infection and detect all bacteria relevant for choice of antimicrobial treatment with a high sensitivity.

Project description:IntroductionClinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) has been gradually acknowledged in both healthcare and clinical research, but approaches for their precise discrimination at the species level remain scarce. The current study aimed to evaluate the association of CoNS with orthopedic infections, where accurate and prompt identification of etiology is crucial for appropriate diagnosis and treatment decision-making.MethodsA 16S rRNA-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was developed for the detection of Staphylococcus genus and two panels of 3-plex qPCR assays for further differentiation of six CoNS species with remarkable clinical significance, including S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. simulans, S. hominis, S. capitis, and S. caprae. All the assays exhibited excellent analytical performance. ΔCq (quantification cycle) between 16S rRNA and CoNS species-specific targets was established to determine the primary CoNS. These methods were applied to detect CoNS in wound samples from orthopedic patients with and without infection.Results and discussionOverall, CoNS were detected in 17.8% (21/118) of patients with clinically suspected infection and in 9.8% (12/123) of patients without any infection symptom (p < 0.05). Moreover, the association with infection was found to be bacterial quantity dependent. S. epidermidis was identified as the predominant species, followed by S. simulans, S. haemolyticus, and S. hominis. Male sex, open injury, trauma, and lower extremity were determined as risk factors for CoNS infections. CoNS-positive patients had significantly longer hospitalization duration (20 days (15, 33) versus 13 days (7, 22) for Staphylococcus-negative patients, p = 0.003), which could be a considerable burden for healthcare and individual patients. Considering the complex characteristics and devastating consequences of orthopedic infections, further expanding the detection scope for CoNS may be pursued to better understand the etiology of orthopedic infections and to improve therapeutic strategies.

Dataset Information

Potential value of a rapid syndromic multiplex PCR for the diagnosis of native and prosthetic joint infections: a real-world evidence study.

Publications

Potential value of a rapid syndromic multiplex PCR for the diagnosis of native and prosthetic joint infections: a real-world evidence study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets