Global similarities: comparison of the Korean Liver Cancer Association chemoembolization guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer recommendations
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER:
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11007328 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:PurposeThe optimal timing for radiotherapy (RT) after incomplete transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains unclear. This study investigated the optimal timing to initiate RT after incomplete TACE in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B hepatocellular carcinoma.Materials and methodsThis study included 116 lesions in 104 patients who were treated with RT after TACE between 2001 and 2016. The time interval between the last TACE session and RT initiation was retrospectively analyzed. The optimal cut-off time interval that maximized the difference in local failure-free rates (LFFRs) was determined using maximally selected rank statistics.ResultsThe median time interval was 26 days (range: 2-165 days). At a median follow-up of 18 months (range: 3-160 months), the median overall survival was 18 months. The optimal cut-off time interval appeared to be 5 weeks; using this cut-off, 65 and 39 patients were classified into early and late RT groups, respectively. Early RT group had a significantly poorer Child-Pugh class and higher alpha-fetoprotein levels compared to late RT group. Other characteristics, including tumor size (7 cm vs. 6 cm; p=0.144), were not significantly different between the groups. The 1-year LFFR was significantly higher in the early RT group than in the late RT group (94.6% vs. 70.8%; p=0.005). On multivariate analysis, early RT was identified as an independent predictor of favorable local failure-free survival (hazard ratio: 3.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-7.29; p=0.003).ConclusionThe optimal timing for administering RT after incomplete TACE is within 5 weeks. Early administration of RT is associated with better local control.
| S-EPMC8084693 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and aimTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard procedure for treating Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is often carried out in the treatment of BCLC stage 0/A HCC for various reasons. This study aimed to elucidate the prognosis for BCLC stage 0/A HCC patients treated with TACE or with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).Materials and methodsThe prognosis of 242 BCLC stage 0/A HCC patients within Milan criteria who underwent initially TACE or RFA were retrospectively analyzed using propensity score matching analysis.ResultsThe analyses of baseline patient characteristics revealed that the maximum tumor size and the proportion of BCLC stage A patients were significantly higher in patients treated with TACE than in those treated with RFA (P<0.001 and 0.047, respectively). After adjusting these factors using propensity score matching (1:3 matching), patients treated with TACE (n=32) and those treated with RFA (n=96) were further analyzed. The local recurrence rate was significantly higher in the TACE group than in the RFA group (P<0.001). However, the overall survival (OS) in HCC patients treated with TACE was comparable to that in HCC patients treated with RFA (1 year, 93.5 vs. 95.8%; 3 years, 75.4 vs. 85.8%; 5 years, 61.8 vs. 70.7%; P=0.196). Multivariate analyses followed by univariate analyses revealed that serum bilirubin level (P=0.032), serum albumin level (P=0.008), HBV-DNA (P=0.013), and tumor number (P=0.021) were independent predictors of OS.ConclusionTACE can substitute RFA at least in some patients with BCLC 0/A HCC.
| S-EPMC5940395 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and aimsThe Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is the most widely applied staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is recommended for treatment allocation and prognostic prediction. The BCLC guidelines were modified in 2018 to indicate that Child-Pugh A without any ascites is essential for all stages except stage D. This study sought to provide a description of patients with HCC treated at a high-volume liver surgery center in Taiwan where referral is not needed and all treatment modalities are available and reimbursed by the National Health Insurance program. As such, certain variables that could modulate treatment decisions in clinical practice, including financial constraints, the availability of treatment procedures, and the expertise of the hospital, could be excluded. The study further sought to evaluate the adherence to the modified BCLC guidelines.MethodsThis was a retrospective study with prospectively collected data. 1801 consecutive patients with de novo HCC were enrolled through our institution from 2011-2017.ResultsThere were 302 patients with stage 0, 783 with stage A, 242 with stage B, 358 with stage C, and 116 with stage D HCC. Treatment adhering to the modified BCLC guidelines recommendations was provided to 259 (85.8%) stage 0 patients, 606 (77.4%) stage A patients, 120 (49.6%) stage B patients, 93 (26.0%) stage C patients, and 83 (71.6%) stage D patients.ConclusionsWe reported treatment adhering to the modified BCLC guidelines at a high-volume liver surgery center in Taiwan. We found that non-adherence to the modified BCLC staging system was common in treating stage B and C patients.
| S-EPMC7993871 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and Objective: It is unclear if stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is better for the treatment of inoperable early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to retrospectively compare the efficacy of SBRT to TACE in patients with inoperable Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-A stage HCC. Materials and Methods: In this multi-institutional retrospective study, a total of 326 patients with inoperable BCLC-A stage HCC were enrolled. Totally, 167 patients initially received SBRT and 159 initially received TACE. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), intrahepatic control (IC), and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated in univariable and propensity-score matched analyses. Results: There was a smaller median tumor size in the SBRT group than in the TACE group (3.4 cm vs. 7.2 cm, P < 0.001). After propensity score matching in the selection of 95 patient pairs, SBRT had better LC, IC, and PFS than TACE but showed comparable OS. The accumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 85.7, 65.1, and 62.8% in the SBRT group and 83.6, 61.0, and 50.4% in the TACE group, respectively (P = 0.29). The accumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS were 63.4, 35.9, and 27.5% in the SBRT group and 53.5, 27.4, and 14.2% in the TACE group, respectively (P = 0.049). The accumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year LC were 86.8, 62.5, and 56.9% in the SBRT group and 69.3, 53.3, and 36.6% in the TACE group, respectively (P = 0.0047). The accumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year IC were 77.3, 45.9, and 42.4% in the SBRT group and 57.3, 34.1, and 17.7% in the TACE group, respectively (P = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, treatment (SBRT vs. TACE) was a significant covariate associated with local and intrahepatic control (HR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.03-2.47; P = 0.04; HR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.13-2.29; P = 0.009). Conclusions: SBRT was an alternative to TACE for inoperable BCLC-A stage HCC with better local and intrahepatic control. Controlled clinical trials are recommended to evaluate the actual effects of this novel regimen adequately.
| S-EPMC7105822 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBarcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage B (intermediate stage) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly heterogeneous; thus, identifying the most effective treatment for individual patients represents a significant clinical challenge. However, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the only recommended treatment option. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the patient characteristics and outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for BCLC stage B HCC.MethodsA total of 516 patients with BCLC stage B HCC who underwent LDLT (n=104) or did not undergo LDLT (non-LDLT; n=412) between 2004 to 2018 were analyzed by propensity score matching (PSM; 1:4) analysis. Factors influencing overall survival (OS) and recurrence were analyzed using Cox's proportional hazards models.ResultsPatients treated with LDLT achieved better OS than the non-LDLT group, including liver- and non-liver related survival (all P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed age >60 years (P=0.006), a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >4 (P=0.016) and >3 locoregional therapies (LRT) before LDLT (P<0.001) were independent risk factors for HCC recurrence. In addition, age >60 years (P<0.001) and >3 LRT before LDLT (P=0.001) were independent risk factors for OS. Using a combination of age, NLR, and LRT before liver transplantation (LT), the patients can be divided into low-risk (none of risk), intermediate-risk (one of risk), and high risk (more than two of risk) groups. There were significant differences in the cumulative HCC recurrence (P<0.001) and mortality (P<0.001) rates among the three groups.ConclusionsLDLT may represent a valuable therapeutic option for selected patients with BCLC stage B HCC.
| S-EPMC10129878 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAccurate staging is necessary for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis and guiding patient management. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system has limitations due to heterogeneity observed among patients in BCLC stages B and C. In contrast, the Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system offers more aggressive treatment strategies.AimTo compare the prognostic performance of HKLC and BCLC staging systems in Egyptian patients with HCC.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study at the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt, on 1015 HCC patients. Data was collected from patients' medical records over 10 years (from 2008 to 2018). The BCLC and HKLC stages were identified, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare patients' overall survival rates within each staging system. Additionally, we evaluated the comparative prognostic performance of the two staging systems.ResultsHepatitis C was identified as the underlying etiology in 799 patients (78.7%), hepatitis B in 12 patients (1.2%), and non-viral causes in 204 patients (20.1%). The survival analysis demonstrated significant differences across the various stages within both the BCLC and HKLC systems. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated a marginally superior performance of the HKLC system in predicting survival at 1, 2, and 3 years compared to the BCLC system. Furthermore, the HKLC staging provided a slightly enhanced prognostic capability, particularly for patients classified under BCLC stages B and C, suggesting a potential survival benefit.ConclusionHKLC classification had a slightly better prognostic performance than BCLC staging system and may offer a survival advantage for certain patients with HCC in BCLC stage B and C HCC cases.
| S-EPMC11409554 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7607098 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimTo investigate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant sorafenib after curative resection for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsThirty-four HCC patients, classified as BCLC-stage C, received adjuvant sorafenib for high-risk of tumor recurrence after curative hepatectomy at a tertiary care university hospital. The study group was compared with a case-matched control group of 68 patients who received curative hepatectomy for HCC during the study period in a 1:2 ratio.ResultsThe tumor recurrence rate was markedly lower in the sorafenib group (15/34, 44.1%) than in the control group (51/68, 75%, P = 0.002). The median disease-free survival was 12 mo in the study group and 10 mo in the control group. Tumor number more than 3, macrovascular invasion, hilar lymph nodes metastasis, and treatment with sorafenib were significant factors of disease-free survival by univariate analysis. Tumor number more than 3 and treatment with sorafenib were significant risk factors of disease-free survival by multivariate analysis in the Cox proportional hazards model. The disease-free survival and cumulative overall survival in the study group were significantly better than in the control group (P = 0.034 and 0.016, respectively).ConclusionOur study verifies the potential benefit and safety of adjuvant sorafenib for both decreasing HCC recurrence and extending disease-free and overall survival rates for patients with BCLC-stage C HCC after curative resection.
| S-EPMC4910659 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer globally and the fourth most common cancer in men in Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle-aged and elderly patients. These practice guidelines will provide useful and constructive advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 44 experts in hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology in the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2014 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions.
| S-EPMC6609431 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer globally and the fourth most common cancer in men in Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle-aged and elderly patients. These practice guidelines will provide useful and constructive advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 44 experts in hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology and radiation oncology in the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2014 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions.
| S-EPMC6529163 | biostudies-literature