The motivational beliefs and attitudes about writing of international students enrolled in online academic English classes during the COVID-19 pandemic
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Collins P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11208714 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Academic English is discipline-specific and requires a high level of linguistic knowledge as well as expertise in respective fields. Therefore, doctoral students with limited exposure to academic English tend to face challenges in dealing with its demands, especially when they come from non-native English-speaking (NNES) backgrounds. At the doctoral level, research students are expected to work independently. Therefore, the ability to critically engage with academic materials written in English and the ability to write a dissertation in English at an expected standard play essential roles in successful PhD completion for students studying in international PhD programs where everything is conducted in English. This study investigates the relationship between English academic reading (EAR) and English academic writing (EAW) abilities among NNES doctoral students. We conducted a survey by employing a 1-6 Likert scale, following Dörnyei and Dewaele (2022), in the 2021-2022 academic year. A total of 255 international doctoral students studying in 65 PhD programs across Hungary voluntarily participated in the study. The students came from 49 countries and represented 48 mother tongues. The analysis revealed that students were positive about their abilities in both EAR and EAW, even though there was a significant gender difference at the p < 0.01 level. Additionally, students with the highest English proficiency level (C2) were found to be the most confident about their EAR and EAW abilities. The most junior students from 1st-year PhD programs were less confident about their abilities compared to their peers from 2nd, 3rd, 4th-year PhD programs. The analysis showed a significantly positive correlation between EAR and EAW (r = 0.792, p < 0.001). This study highlighted the inseparable role of EAR in fulfilling doctoral requirements and submitting a dissertation within a contracted PhD time framework, indicating the importance of targeted language support in facilitating academic progression within PhD programs.
| S-EPMC11305283 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Flipped learning models are considered as important elements of English as a foreign language (EFL) writing courses in order to advance the EFL learners' writing skills. Significantly, studies examining the efficacy of in-class and out-of-class writing models in flipped classroom settings when teaching online EFL writing courses are still of focus in the Turkish Cypriot context. This investigation aimed to examine the most efficient flipped learning model among the in-class vs. out-of-class writing models for the purpose of helping instructors to advance their EFL learners' writing achievement in an online writing setting. In addition, this study sorted to reveal the EFL learners' perceptions toward learning writing through in-class and out-of-class flipped learning writing models. A mixed methods research design was applied to achieve the aforementioned aims. Twenty-eight EFL learners studying at a private university's English Language Teaching department constituted the participants of this study. As the findings pointed out, the EFL learners in group A who wrote their essays in-class outperformed those in group B, who wrote their essays out-of-class. Moreover, it was found that the majority of the participants had more positive perceptions toward the in-class flipped classroom writing model. This study highlights that, better learner performances are achieved when the learners write during the class session online with the support of the instructor when implementing a flipped classroom model to teach EFL writing.
| S-EPMC9703047 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Doctoral students are expected to contribute to their academic community by presenting their research findings in an internationally acceptable manner and to submit their dissertation. Students from non-English-speaking backgrounds might face challenges when writing publishable papers and dissertations in English. The aim of this study is to explore conceptual metaphors doctoral students used for characterizing their English academic writing experiences during their doctoral studies. A survey was conducted in the spring of 2022 inviting all non-native English-speaking doctoral students. They were asked to finish the sentence: “Writing an academic paper in English is like …..”. A total of 255 doctoral students (125 females; 127 males; 3 not stated) studying at 14 Hungarian universities volunteered to participate. They were from 49 countries and used 52 mother tongues. The metaphor dataset was analyzed following Lakoff and Johnson’ (1980) theoretical framework. Ten conceptual domains emerged from the dataset: WORK, TEXT PRODUCTION, CHALLENGE, STRUGGLE, CHANGING PLACES, ACTIVITIY, NOURISMENT, EASY TASK, CONSTRUCTION, and COMPLEX PROCESS. Only four students shared very negative metaphors on their experiences; whereas most students’ metaphors reflected optimism, even though they implied various demanding features of English academic writing. Students’ metaphors offered new authentic insights into their emic perspectives on their lived experiences.
| S-EPMC9932679 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study aimed to investigate the effects of English learning beliefs (ELBs) on English achievement via academic emotions (AEs). The study also examined gender and domain differences in ELBs and AEs. English learning beliefs involved in this study included beliefs about authority, difficulty, risk-taking, and the nature of English language learning. Among academic emotions, this study used only embarrassment, anxiety, and enjoyment. Undergraduate students (N = 440) were selected using the multistage sampling technique. The study used an English achievement test and closed-ended questionnaires to collect data. The study employed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to factorize the dimensions of English learning beliefs and academic emotions. The present researchers employed structural equation modeling to determine the direct and indirect effects of English learning beliefs on English test scores; an independent samples t-test to explain gender differences (m = 315, f = 125); and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to assess group differences (social science = 154, natural science = 194, and technology group = 92) in dimensions of ELBs and AEs. The findings indicated that English learning beliefs had both direct and indirect effects on English achievement via embarrassment, anxiety, and enjoyment. Further, significant gender differences took place in authority belief, risk-taking belief, difficulty belief, embarrassment, and anxiety, but no gender difference took place in enjoyment. Further, MANOVA results showed significant domain differences in all English learning beliefs, embarrassment, and anxiety that favored the technology group. Finally, the article provides details of the analysis results, interpretations, discussions, and implications of the study.
| S-EPMC9257335 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study investigates how non-native English-speaking (NNES) doctoral students self-assess their English academic writing (EAW) abilities. A total of 255 international NNES students, hailing from 49 different countries and speaking 48 mother tongues, voluntarily participated in our study. They were enrolled in 65 PhD programs at 14 universities across Hungary during the 2021-2022 academic year. To address our research aim, we developed a survey using a 6-point Likert scale, following the guidelines of Dörnyei and Dewaele (2022). The survey focused on self-assessing their abilities to write academic texts in English. The analysis results indicate that students lacked confidence in their EAW abilities at the beginning of their PhD studies but exhibited increased confidence at the current stage. The results also highlight the influence of gender and English language proficiency on EAW self-assessments. Additionally, senior PhD students demonstrated greater confidence in field-specific lexical knowledge compared to their first-year peers. This study highlights the fact that NNES novice writers lacked the necessary EAW skills upon entering their PhD programs, making it challenging for them to start doctoral-level writing immediately. This underscores the need for comprehensive support that encompasses both enhancing English language proficiency and providing academic writing assistance.
| S-EPMC10745157 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The potential of academic engagement to enhance academic outcomes and well-being has been empirically supported, yet studies addressing its predictors are too limited. Hence, the current study collected self-report cross-sectional data from randomly selected 614 (male = 323) high school students in Ethiopia and examined the relations of academic socialization (parental and peer), self-efficacy, and outcome expectations in explaining variance in academic engagement, guided by an integrative model of engagement. Structural equation modeling with the maximum likelihood method indicated that (a) the hypothesized model fit the data well, (b) direct paths from parental and peer academic socialization to self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and academic engagement were positive and significant, (c) the relationships of the constructs in the model explained a significant portion of the variance in academic engagement, and (d) self-efficacy and outcome expectations significantly and positively but partially mediated the pathway from academic socialization to academic engagement. The findings' implications for boosting student academic engagement were forwarded.
| S-EPMC11310935 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Identity construction is a crucial factor in assessing and enhancing the quality of academic writing. However, identity is elusive and difficult to capture due to its abstract nature. Most existing literature discussed academic writing in a general way, overlooking specific studies on identity construction in articles, theses, and dissertations. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of studies on identity construction in typical academic writing and assist readers in understanding the development, discoveries, and future trends in this field. It seeks to enlighten scholars and students regarding future research directions and to improve academic writing quality in practice. A bibliometric tool, CiteSpace, was used together with manual close reading. The data were primarily retrieved from the Web of Science database. Keyword co-occurrence and cluster analyses were conducted to describe the current state of research and predict future hotspots. It was found that the literature in this field generally showed an upward trend before 2020. High-frequency keywords primarily relate to literacy, doctoral education, pedagogy, plagiarism, and gender, representing this field's primary research area. Most clusters exhibit a high level of novelty but have not yet received the attention they deserve because they are situated in the second quadrant of the coordinate diagram as potential clusters. Clusters focusing on socio-cultural identity and the pedagogy of identity construction are more prominent than the other areas. Those focusing on academic (professional) development related to authorial and academic identity are more novel.
| S-EPMC11667089 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A much-debated question in the L2 assessment field is if computer familiarity should be considered a potential source of construct-irrelevant variance in computer-based writing (CBW) tests. This study aims to make a partial validity argument for an online source-based writing test (OSWT) designed for English placement testing (EPT), focusing on the explanation inference. Score interpretations on the OWST are proposed and supporting evidence is sought in terms of test-takers’ self-confidence in and preferences for CBW tests (two interrelated aspects of computer familiarity) and L2 writing ability. Ninety-seven ESL students demonstrating two different levels (higher and lower levels) of L2 writing ability studying at a US university completed the OSWT and an online questionnaire asking about their attitudes towards CBW tests. A series of statistical and thematic analyses revealed that most of the test-takers held self-confidence in and preferences for CBW tests for reasons related to previous CBW experience (e.g., familiarity with CBW, useful tools/functions available on computers) regardless of L2 writing ability. The higher-level test-takers obtained significantly higher scores on the OSWT than their lower-level counterparts. Test-takers’ preferences were a significant predictor of the OSWT scores only in the higher-level group. The findings largely support the validity of proposed score interpretations on the OSWT. Implications are discussed in terms of test fairness and the construct of CBW tests. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40468-022-00187-0.
| S-EPMC9474279 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Learning is the result of many factors that interplay within individuals. That is why most learning variables affect academic performances of learners in one way or another though the strength of their predictive power could vary. The present study aimed to examine the effects of previous English achievement on English learning beliefs (ELBs) that would consequently affect college academic performances. Four hundred and seventy three respondents participated in the study through multistage sampling. A 15 items questionnaire with a 5-point Likert Scale was used to measure students' English learning beliefs. Self-reported Ethiopian Higher education Entrance Examination result of English achievement of students was used to represent their previous English results, while a 25 items teacher-made test was used to assess students' English achievement. First year first semester Grade Point Average was also used from students themselves. The principal factor analysis method produced three dimensions of English learning beliefs: combined beliefs about authority and difficulty, nature of English language learning, and risk-taking beliefs. Coefficient alpha values of the components ranged from 0.77 to 0.92. Multiple regression and structural equation modeling were employed to analyze the collected data. The results indicated that past English achievement had significant direct and indirect effects on English test scores and semester grade point average (SGPA) at college. The study discussed the results and educational implications were forwarded.
| S-EPMC9272349 | biostudies-literature
Project description:There have been a handful of studies on kindergarteners’ motivational beliefs about writing, yet measuring these beliefs in young children continues to pose a set of challenges. The purpose of this exploratory, mixed-methods study was to examine how kindergarteners understand and respond to different assessment formats designed to capture their motivational beliefs about writing. Across two studies, we administered four assessment formats — a 4-point Likert-type scale survey, a binary choice survey, a challenge preference task, and a semi-structured interview — to a sample of 114 kindergarteners engaged in a larger writing intervention study. Our overall goals were to examine the benefits and challenges of using these assessment formats to capture kindergarteners’ motivational beliefs and to gain insight on future directions for studying these beliefs in this young age group. Many participants had a difficult time responding to the 4-point Likert-type scale survey, due to challenges with the response format and the way the items were worded. However, more simplified assessment formats, including the binary choice survey and challenge preference task, may not have fully captured the nuances and complexities of participants’ motivational beliefs. The semi-structured interview leveraged participants’ voices and highlighted details that were overlooked in the other assessment formats. Participants’ interview responses were deeply intertwined with their local, everyday experiences and pushed back on common assumptions of what constitutes negatively oriented motivational beliefs about writing. Overall, our results suggest that kindergarteners’ motivational beliefs appear to be multifaceted, contextually grounded, and hard to quantify. Additional research is needed to further understand how motivational beliefs are shaped during kindergarten. We argue that motivational beliefs must be studied in context rather than in a vacuum, in order to work toward a fair and meaningful understanding of motivational beliefs about writing that can be applied to school settings.
| S-EPMC10437215 | biostudies-literature