Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The measurement of aortic dimensions and their evolution are key in the management of patients with aortic diseases. Manual assessment, the current guideline-recommended method and clinical standard, is subjective, poorly reproducible, and time-consuming, limiting the capacity to track aortic growth in everyday practice. Aortic geometry mapping (AGM) via image registration of serial computed tomography angiograms outperforms manual assessment, providing accurate and reproducible 3D maps of aortic diameter and growth rate. This observational study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of AGM on non-gated contrast-enhanced (CE-) and cardiac- and respiratory-gated (GN-) magnetic resonance angiographies (MRA).Methods
Patients with thoracic aortic disease
SUBMITTER: Dux-Santoy L
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11211222 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Summer
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature