Dataset Information

Long-term posttransplant survival outcome following bridging locoregional therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Aim

Liver transplantation (LT) is essential due to its curative efficacy, but liver-graft shortages have limited its widespread application. Bridging locoregional therapy (LRT) before LT has been performed to prevent tumor progression, and a recent literature review revealed that it is associated with a nonsignificant trend toward better survival outcomes. However, much more information on bridging therapy has become available since then. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the posttransplant survival and HCC recurrence between patients with and without pretransplant bridging LRT.

Methods

Studies were identified in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library. Two independent researchers screened titles and full articles, extracted relevant data, and conducted a parametric survival analysis.

Results

Out of 4794 studies, 18 cohort studies were eligible. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93.1%, 85.0%, and 79.1% for those in the bridging LRT group, while they were 91.8%, 81.1%, and 75.5% for those who did not receive LRT, respectively. There were no differences in overall survival between these groups (HR 0.90; 0.78-1.05, P = 0.17). Interestingly, we discovered that bridging therapy helped prolong survival significantly in a high-risk population with a long waiting time (HR 0.76; 0.60-0.96, P = 0.02). Unfortunately, bridging LRT did not improve disease-free survival (HR 0.98; 0.86-1.11, P = 0.70).

Conclusions

The results indicate that bridging LRT does not generally change post-LT outcomes. However, bridging LRT can significantly improve survival in patients with a long waiting time for LT.

SUBMITTER: Chuncharunee A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11228543 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Long-term posttransplant survival outcome following bridging locoregional therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chuncharunee Alan A Oranratnachai Songporn S Chuncharunee Lancharat L Intaraprasong Pongphob P Thakkinstian Ammarin A Sobhonslidsuk Abhasnee A

JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 20240708 7

<h4>Aim</h4>Liver transplantation (LT) is essential due to its curative efficacy, but liver-graft shortages have limited its widespread application. Bridging locoregional therapy (LRT) before LT has been performed to prevent tumor progression, and a recent literature review revealed that it is associated with a nonsignificant trend toward better survival outcomes. However, much more information on bridging therapy has become available since then. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the posttrans ...[more]

PMID: 38978769

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundYttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization is a catheter-based therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Multiple trials have evaluated the efficacy of Y90 in HCC; however, few have assessed long-term hepatic function. This study aimed to evaluate a clinical real-world experience of Y90 effectiveness and long-term impact on hepatic function.MethodsA single-center retrospective chart review was performed for patients with Child-Pugh (CP) class A or B who received Y90 for primary HCC between 2008 and 2016. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and CP scores were calculated on the day of treatment and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-procedure.ResultsOf the 134 patients included, the mean age was 60 years old and median overall survival (OS) from date of diagnosis was 28 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.21-38.05]. Patients with CP class A (85%) had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3 months (95% CI: 2.99-5.55) and median OS of 17 months (95% CI: 9.59-23.10) from date of Y90 treatment compared to a median PFS of 4 months (95% CI: 2.07-8.28) and OS of 8 months (95% CI: 4.60-15.64) for patients with CP class B. MELD scores were significantly higher post-treatment than pre-treatment, with significant recovery at 24 months. No significant differences were seen between cancer stage and OS, while PFS and cancer stage did show difference between cancer stage 1 and 3 with longer median PFS seen in stage 1.ConclusionsWhile our study supports the literature for OS in Y90-treated patients, we found a shorter PFS in this population. This may reflect the differences between the utilization of RECIST in clinical trials and clinical radiology practice in determining progression. Significant factors associated with OS were age, MELD, CP scores and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). For PFS, CP score and stage at diagnosis were significant. Increasing MELD scores over time likely reflected a combination of radioembolization-induced liver disease, liver decompensation or progression of HCC. The downtrend at 24 months is likely due to long term survivors with significant benefit from therapy with no long-term complications from Y90.

Project description:Background/aimRecent studies have suggested that periportal location of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is considered as one of the independent risk factors for local tumor progression (LTP). However, the long-term therapeutic outcomes of percutaneous RFA as the first-line therapy for single periportal HCCand corresponding impacts on tumor recurrence or progression are still unclear.Materials and methodsFrom February 2011 to October 2020, a total of 233 patients with single nodular HCC ≤ 5 cm who underwent RFA ± transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as first-line therapy was enrolled and analyzed, including 56 patients in the periportal group and 177 patients in the nonperiportal group. The long-term therapeutic outcomes between the two groups were compared, risk factors of tumor recurrence or progression were evaluated.ResultsThe LTP rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were significantly higher in the periportal group than those in the nonperiportal group (15.7, 33.7, and 46.9% vs 6.0, 15.7, and 28.7%, respectively, P = 0.0067). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the periportal group were significantly worse than those in the nonperiportal group (81.3, 65.1 and 42.9% vs 99.3, 90.4 and 78.1%, respectively, P<0.0001). In the subgroup of single HCC ≤ 3 cm, patients with periportal HCC showed significantly worse LTP P = 0.0006) and OS (P<0.0001) after RFA than patients with single nonperiportal HCC; The univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that tumor size, periportal HCC and AFP ≥ 400ug/ml were independent prognostic factors for tumor progression after RFA. Furthermore, patients with single periportal HCC had significantly higher risk for IDR(P = 0.0012), PVTT(P<0.0001) and extrahepatic recurrence(P = 0.0010) after RFA than those patients with single nonperiportal HCC. .ConclusionThe long-term therapeutic outcomes of RFA as the first-line therapy for single periportal HCC were worse than those for single nonperiportal HCC, an increased higher risk of tumor recurrence or progression after RFA was significantly associated with periportal HCC.

Project description:BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our policy for the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been to minimize the extent of liver resection using a microwave tissue coagulator (MTC) and to not perform Pringle's maneuver for the prevention of ischemic injury to the liver routinely. We verify the safety of liver resection using MTC in HCC patients with poor liver functional reserve, and clarify the long-term outcome of HCC patients who underwent curative resection using MTC. METHODOLOGY: One hundred sixty-eight patients who underwent curative resection using MTC between 1992 and 2001 were divided into two groups according each patient's score in the Indocyanin Green Retension 15 Test (ICG-R15 test). The high (ICG-R15 values>20) and low ICG-R15 groups (ICG-R15 values<20) included 100 and 68 HCC patients, respectively. Clinical characteristics of each group were evaluated, and operative mortality and morbidity, as well as overall and disease-free survival rates, were compared between the two groups to determine risk factors for overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: Although there were significant differences in liver function-related parameters between the low and high ICG-R15 groups, no differences in surgical or tumor factors were found. No patients in this study developed post-operative liver failure, and there was no significant difference in morbidity between the low and high ICG-R15 groups. The overall survival rate of the low ICG-R15 group was significantly longer than the high ICG-R15 group (p=0.0003). Cox's multivariate analysis showed that an ICG-R15 value less than 20 was the only significant independent factor for overall survival. Disease-free survival rates in the low ICG-R15 group were significantly longer than in the high ICG-R15 group (p=0.0007). Multivariate analysis showed that serum albumin level and number of tumors were significant independent factors for disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcome of HCC patients with low ICG-R15 following curative resection using MTC was acceptable. This procedure was safe even for patients with high ICG-R15.

Dataset Information

Long-term posttransplant survival outcome following bridging locoregional therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Long-term posttransplant survival outcome following bridging locoregional therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets