Dataset Information

Epigenetic control of adaptive or homeostatic splicing during interval-training activities.

ABSTRACT: Interval-training activities induce adaptive cellular changes without altering their fundamental identity, but the precise underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we demonstrate that interval-training depolarization (ITD) of pituitary cells triggers distinct adaptive or homeostatic splicing responses of alternative exons. This occurs while preserving the steady-state expression of the Prolactin and other hormone genes. The nature of these splicing responses depends on the exon's DNA methylation status, the methyl-C-binding protein MeCP2 and its associated CA-rich motif-binding hnRNP L. Interestingly, the steady expression of the Prolactin gene is also reliant on MeCP2, whose disruption leads to exacerbated multi-exon aberrant splicing and overexpression of the hormone gene transcripts upon ITD, similar to the observed hyperprolactinemia or activity-dependent aberrant splicing in Rett Syndrome. Therefore, epigenetic control is crucial for both adaptive and homeostatic splicing and particularly the steady expression of the Prolactin hormone gene during ITD. Disruption in this regulation may have significant implications for the development of progressive diseases.

SUBMITTER: Liu L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11229381 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Epigenetic control of adaptive or homeostatic splicing during interval-training activities.

Liu Ling L Nguyen Hai H Das Urmi U Ogunsola Samuel S Yu Jiankun J Lei Lei L Kung Matthew M Pejhan Shervin S Rastegar Mojgan M Xie Jiuyong J

Nucleic acids research 20240701 12

Interval-training activities induce adaptive cellular changes without altering their fundamental identity, but the precise underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we demonstrate that interval-training depolarization (ITD) of pituitary cells triggers distinct adaptive or homeostatic splicing responses of alternative exons. This occurs while preserving the steady-state expression of the Prolactin and other hormone genes. The nature of these splicing responses depen ...[more]

PMID: 38661216

Similar Datasets

Project description:This study analyzed whether 100- and 200-m interval training (IT) in swimming differed regarding temporal, perceptual, and physiological responses. The IT was performed at maximal aerobic velocity (MAV) until exhaustion and time spent near to maximalVO2 peak oxygen uptake (⩒O2peak), total time limit (tLim), peak blood lactate [La-] peak, ⩒O2 kinetics (⩒O2K), and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were compared between protocols. Twelve swimmers (seven males 16.1 ± 1.1 and five females 14.2 ± 1 years) completed a discontinuous incremental step test for the second ventilatory threshold (VT2), ⩒O2peak, and MAV assessment. The swimmers subsequently completed two IT protocols at MAV with 100- and 200-m bouts to determine the maximal ⩒O2 (peak-⩒O2) and time spent ≥VT2, 90, and 95% of ⩒O2peak for the entire protocols (IT100 and IT200) and during the first 800-m of each protocol (IT8x100 and IT4x200). A portable apparatus (K4b2) sampled gas exchange through a snorkel and an underwater led signal controlled the velocity. RPE was also recorded. The Peak-⩒O2 attained during IT8x100 and IT4x200 (57.3 ± 4.9 vs. 57.2 ± 4.6 ml·kg-1·min-1) were not different between protocols (p = 0.98) nor to ⩒O2peak (59.2 ± 4.2 ml·kg-1·min-1, p = 0.37). The time constant of ⩒O2K (24.9 ± 8.4 vs. 25.1 ± 6.3-s, p = 0.67) and [La-] peak (7.9 ± 3.4 and 8.7 ± 1.5 mmol·L-1, p = 0.15) also did not differ between IT100 and IT200. The time spent ≥VT2, 90, and 95%⩒O2peak were also not different between IT8x100 and IT4x200 (p = 0.93, 0.63, and 1.00, respectively). The RPE for IT8x100 was lower than that for IT4x200 (7.62 ± 2 vs. 9.5 ± 0.7, p = 0.01). Both protocols are considered suitable for aerobic power enhancement, since ⩒O2peak was attained with similar ⩒O2K and sustained with no differences in tLim. However, the fact that only the RPE differed between the IT protocols suggested that coaches should consider that nx100-m/15-s is perceived as less difficult to perform compared with nx200-m/30-s for the first 800-m when managing the best strategy to be implemented for aerobic power training.

Project description:Pregnant women are more susceptible to high blood pressure (BP) than the general adult population; therefore, all means of preventing this condition should be considered. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is effective in this regard in the general population, but there is a lack of evidence of its effectiveness during pregnancy. This study aimed to compare an 8-week HIIT program to self-performed moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among pregnant women by evaluating changes in BP after a maximal progressive cardiorespiratory exercise test (CPET) performed at pre-intervention and post-intervention time points. A total of 54 Caucasian women in uncomplicated, singleton pregnancies (age 32 ± 4 years, 22 ± 4 weeks of gestation; M ± SD) with normal BP values completed the interventions. The experimental (HIIT) group (n = 34) completed an online supervised HIIT program consisting of three sessions per week and supplemented by an educational class once per week. Participants in the education (EDU) group (n = 20) attended an educational class once per week and were encouraged to perform moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA) on their own. Pre- and post-intervention, all women underwent a CPET on a cycle ergometer with a respiratory gas analyzer. On the day of the CPET, maternal systolic and diastolic BP (mmHg) was measured at rest (before the CPET) and approximately 60 min after the CPET using an electronic BP monitor. Identical CPET and BP measurement protocols were employed for both the HIIT and EDU groups at the pre- and post-intervention time points. Pre-intervention, the HIIT and EDU groups both showed a decrease in systolic and diastolic BP after the CPET, though only the change in systolic BP was statistically significant (HIIT group: p = 0.01; EDU group: p = 0.001). Post-intervention, there were no significant differences in either group between resting and post-CPET BP. There were significant post-intervention differences in VO2peak (p < 0.001) and HRmax (p = 0.002) between the HIIT and EDU groups. From pre- to post-intervention, the EDU and HIIT groups both showed decreases in resting systolic or diastolic BP; there was a significant difference in systolic BP in the EDU group (p = 0.005) and a significant difference in diastolic BP in the HIIT group (p = 0.03). Both groups maintained normal BP values throughout the experiment. However, HIIT, in addition to maintaining normotension, improved cardiorespiratory fitness in pregnant women. It seems that both supervised HIIT and self-performed moderate-to-vigorous PA can be recommended as strategies to prevent BP disorders during pregnancy. More studies are needed to confirm our findings.Trial registration The full study protocol was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05009433).

Dataset Information

Epigenetic control of adaptive or homeostatic splicing during interval-training activities.

Publications

Epigenetic control of adaptive or homeostatic splicing during interval-training activities.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets