Dataset Information

Sleep and Circadian Health of Critical Survivors: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To investigate the sleep and circadian health of critical survivors 12 months after hospital discharge and to evaluate a possible effect of the severity of the disease within this context.

Design

Observational, prospective study.

Setting

Single-center study.

Patients

Two hundred sixty patients admitted to the ICU due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and main results

The cohort was composed of 260 patients (69.2% males), with a median (quartile 1-quartile 3) age of 61.5 years (52.0-67.0 yr). The median length of ICU stay was 11.0 days (6.00-21.8 d), where 56.2% of the patients required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) revealed that 43.1% of the cohort presented poor sleep quality 12 months after hospital discharge. Actigraphy data indicated an influence of the disease severity on the fragmentation of the circadian rest-activity rhythm at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups, which was no longer significant in the long term. Still, the length of the ICU stay and the duration of IMV predicted a higher fragmentation of the rhythm at the 12-month follow-up with effect sizes (95% CI) of 0.248 (0.078-0.418) and 0.182 (0.005-0.359), respectively. Relevant associations between the PSQI and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (rho = 0.55, anxiety; rho = 0.5, depression) as well as between the fragmentation of the rhythm and the diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (rho = -0.35) were observed at this time point.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal a great prevalence of critical survivors presenting poor sleep quality 12 months after hospital discharge. Actigraphy data indicated the persistence of circadian alterations and a possible impact of the disease severity on the fragmentation of the circadian rest-activity rhythm, which was attenuated at the 12-month follow-up. This altogether highlights the relevance of considering the sleep and circadian health of critical survivors in the long term.

SUBMITTER: Henriquez-Beltran M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11239094 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Sleep and Circadian Health of Critical Survivors: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study.

Henríquez-Beltrán Mario M Vaca Rafaela R Benítez Iván D ID González Jessica J Santisteve Sally S Aguilà Maria M Minguez Olga O Moncusí-Moix Anna A Gort-Paniello Clara C Torres Gerard G Labarca Gonzalo G Caballero Jesús J Barberà Carme C Torres Antoni A de Gonzalo-Calvo David D Barbé Ferran F Targa Adriano D S ADS

Critical care medicine 20240410 8

<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate the sleep and circadian health of critical survivors 12 months after hospital discharge and to evaluate a possible effect of the severity of the disease within this context.<h4>Design</h4>Observational, prospective study.<h4>Setting</h4>Single-center study.<h4>Patients</h4>Two hundred sixty patients admitted to the ICU due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.<h4>Interventions</h4>None.<h4>Measurements and main results</h4>The cohort was ...[more]

PMID: 38597721

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSurvivors of critical illness endure long-lasting physical and mental challenges. Despite the persistence of poor sleep quality in a considerable proportion of patients at the 12-month follow-up, studies with assessments exceeding this period are limited. We aimed to investigate the trajectory of sleep over the 24 months following critical illness.MethodsObservational, prospective study. Patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited during the intensive care unit stay. Evaluations of sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), mental health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), quality of life (12-item Short Form Survey [SF-12]), and other factors were performed in the short-term, and at 12 and 24 months after hospital discharge. Good sleep quality was defined as a PSQI score of ≤ 5. Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) was defined as a decrease of ≥ 4 points in the PSQI score between the short-term assessment and the 24-month follow-up.ResultsThe cohort included 196 patients (69.9% males), with a median [p25;p75] age of 62.0 [53.0;67.2] years. The global population showed a mean (95% CI) change of - 0.91 ( - 1.50 to - 0.31) points in the PSQI score from the short-term assessment to the 24-month follow-up. Based on PSQI score trajectories, three distinct groups of patients were identified: (i) the healthy group, consisting of patients with good sleep quality in the short-term that was maintained throughout the follow-up period; (ii) the MCII group, consisting of patients with poor sleep quality in the short-term, but with improvement over time, ultimately reaching levels comparable to the healthy group; (iii) the non-MCII group, consisting of those with consistently poor sleep quality across the entire follow-up. Further analyses revealed that PSQI score trajectories were closely aligned with those of the HADS and SF-12 mental scores.ConclusionsOur findings reveal that a subset of critical illness survivors requires up to 24 months after the acute phase to fully restore their sleep quality, while a significant proportion does not experience a clinically significant improvement in sleep quality over this period. These distinct sleep trajectories are strongly correlated with mental health status, highlighting the importance of addressing sleep alongside mental health within the framework of post-intensive care syndrome.

Project description:PurposeStudies integrating an exhaustive longitudinal long-term follow-up of postintensive care syndrome (PICS) in critically ill COVID-19 survivors are scarce. We aimed to 1) describe PICS-related sequelae over a 12-month period after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, 2) identify relevant demographic and clinical factors related to PICS, and 3) explore how PICS-related sequelae may influence health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in critically ill COVID-19 survivors.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study in adult critically ill survivors of SARS-CoV-2 infection that did or did not need invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain (March 2020 to January 2021). We performed a telemedicine follow-up of PICS-related sequelae (physical/functional, cognitive, and mental health) and HRQoL with five data collection points. We retrospectively collected demographic and clinical data. We used multivariable mixed-effects models for data analysis.ResultsWe included 142 study participants in the final analysis, with a median [interquartile range] age of 61 [53-68] yr; 35% were female and 59% needed IMV. Fatigue/dyspnea, pain, impaired muscle function, psychiatric symptomatology and reduced physical HRQoL were prominent sequelae early after ICU discharge. Over the 12-month follow-up, functionality and fatigue/dyspnea improved progressively, while pain remained stable. We observed slight fluctuations in anxiety symptoms and perception of cognitive deficit, whereas posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive symptoms improved, with a mild rebound at the end of the follow-up. Female sex, younger age, and the need for IMV were risk factors for PICS, while having higher cognitive reserve was a potential protective factor. Physical HRQoL scores showed a general improvement over time, whereas mental HRQoL remained stable. Shorter ICU stay, better functionality, and lower scores for fatigue/dyspnea and pain were associated with better physical HRQoL, while lower scores for anxiety, depression, and PTSD were associated with better mental HRQoL.ConclusionsPostintensive care syndrome was common in COVID-19 critical illness survivors and persisted in a significant proportion of patients one year after ICU discharge, impacting HRQoL. The presence of risk factors for PICS may identify patients who are more likely to develop the condition and who would benefit from more specific and closer follow-up after ICU admission.Study registrationClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04422444 ); first submitted 9 June 2020.

Project description:IntroductionThe socio-economic impact of critical illnesses on patients and their families in Europe has yet to be determined. The aim of this exploratory study was to estimate changes in family circumstances, social and economic stability, care requirements and access to health services for patients during their first 12 months after ICU discharge.MethodsMulti-center questionnaire-based study of survivors of critical illness at 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge.ResultsData for 293 consenting patients who spent greater than 48 hours in one of 22 UK ICUs were obtained at 6 and 12 months post-ICU discharge. There was little evidence of a change in accommodation or relationship status between pre-admission and 12 months following discharge from an ICU. A negative impact on family income was reported by 33% of all patients at 6 months and 28% at 12 months. There was nearly a 50% reduction in the number of patients who reported employment as their sole source of income at 12 months (19% to 11%) compared with pre-admission. One quarter of patients reported themselves in need of care assistance at 6 months and 22% at 12 months. The majority of care was provided by family members (80% and 78%, respectively), for half of whom there was a negative impact on employment. Amongst all patients receiving care, 26% reported requiring greater than 50 hours a week. Following discharge, 79% of patients reported attending their primary care physician and 44% had seen a community nurse. Mobility problems nearly doubled between pre-admission and 6 months (32% to 64%). Furthermore, 73% reported moderate or severe pain at 12 months and 44% remained significantly anxious or depressed.ConclusionsSurvivors of critical illness in the UK face a negative impact on employment and commonly have a care requirement after discharge from hospital. This has a corresponding negative impact on family income. The majority of the care required is provided by family members. This effect was apparent by 6 months and had not materially improved by 12 months. This exploratory study has identified the potential for a significant socio-economic burden following critical illness.

Project description:BackgroundAnorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious and potentially life-threatening eating disorder characterized by starvation and malnutrition, a high prevalence of coexisting psychiatric conditions, marked treatment resistance, frequent medical complications, and a substantial risk of death. Body mass index (BMI) is a key measure of treatment outcome of AN and it is necessary to evaluate the long-term prognosis of AN. This study aimed to better assess the BMI course trend between different medications and timepoints in order to improve AN treatment in clinical practice.MethodsDuring the period 2010-2021, we retrospectively reviewed historical data of all patients diagnosed with AN. There were two groups in this study, which were based on the duration of follow-up. Group A was a 6-month follow-up group, comprising 93 patients (mean age 19.6 ± 6.8 years), with BMI assessed at three consecutive time points: first outpatient visit (T0), three months follow-up (T3), and six months follow-up (T6). Group B was a 12-month follow-up group comprising 36 patients (mean age 17.0 ± 5.2 years) with BMI assessed at five consecutive time points: first outpatient visit (T0), three months follow-up (T3), six months follow-up (T6), nine months follow-up (T9), and twelve months follow-up (T12). In our study, we retrospectively compared BMI courses based on patients' usage of medication using the following variables: single medication, switching medications, combined medications, and without medications. The primary outcome measurement was BMI recorded at the 6-month follow-up and the 12-month follow-up respectively. In our study, which was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, we reviewed outpatient medical records of all patients with AN who were seen at the hospital during the period 2010-2021.ResultsIn Group A (6-month follow-up), patients treated with antidepressants showed a mean BMI increase of 1.3 (p < 0.001); patients treated with antipsychotics showed a mean BMI increase of 1.1 (p = 0.01); patients treated with switching medications showed a mean BMI increase of 0.1 (p = 0.397); patients treated with combined medications showed a mean BMI increase of 0.5 (p = 0.208); and patients treated without medications showed a mean BMI increase of 0.1 (p = 0.821). The results indicated that patients with AN had a significant BMI increase after treatment with antidepressants and antipsychotics in the 6-month follow-up group. In Group B (12-month follow-up), patients treated with antidepressants showed a mean BMI increase of 2.7 (p < 0.001); patients treated with antipsychotics showed a mean BMI increase of 2.8 (p = 0.168); patients treated with switching medications showed a mean BMI decrease of 0.8 (p = 0.595); patients treated with combined medications showed a mean BMI increase of 1.6 (p = 0.368); and patients treated without medications showed a mean BMI increase of 1.0 (p = 0.262). The results indicated that patients with AN had a significant BMI increase after treatment with antidepressants at the 12-month follow-up.ConclusionsAN is a complex disease caused by multiple factors. Evaluating its long-term prognosis is crucial. Our study provides insights and highlights three key findings: 1) medication adherence is crucial in treating AN, 2) frequent switching of medications may not promote weight gain and may also require a re-establishment of rapport with patients with AN, and 3) pharmacotherapy, especially antidepressants, is more effective than no treatment. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Dataset Information

Sleep and Circadian Health of Critical Survivors: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study.

Objectives

Design

Setting

Patients

Interventions

Measurements and main results

Conclusions

Publications

Sleep and Circadian Health of Critical Survivors: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets