Unknown

Dataset Information

Minimal Access vs Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.


ABSTRACT:

Importance

While nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) for breast cancer was only performed using the open method in the past, its frequency using endoscopic and robotic surgical instruments has been increasing rapidly. However, there are limited studies regarding postoperative complications and the benefits and drawbacks of minimal access NSM (M-NSM) compared with conventional NSM (C-NSM).

Objective

To examine the differences in postoperative complications between C-NSM and M-NSM.

Design, setting, participants

This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study enrolling 1583 female patients aged 19 years and older with breast cancer who underwent NSM at 21 university hospitals in Korea between January 2018 and December 2020. Those with mastectomy without preserving the nipp

SUBMITTER: Kim JH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11325243 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature