Impact of Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 Dosing Interval in Hemodialysis Patients.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Lamarche C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11328573 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Impact of Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 Dosing Interval in Hemodialysis Patients.
Lamarche Caroline C Tennankore Karthik K Marchitto Lorie L Beabien-Souligny William W Goupil Rémi R Nadeau-Fredette Annie-Claire AC Gunaratnam Lakshman L Mac-Way Fabrice F Benlarbi Mehdi M Chatterjee Debashree D Tom Alexander A Medjahed Halima H Kaufmann Daniel E DE Finzi Andrés A Suri Rita S RS
Kidney international reports 20240624 8
Similar Datasets
Project description:Vaccination against 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) can reduce disease incidence and severity. Dialysis patients demonstrate a delayed immunologic response to vaccines. We determined factors affecting the immunologic response to COVID-19 vaccines in haemodialysis patients. All patients within a Swedish haemodialysis network, vaccinated with two doses of COVID-19 vaccine 2-8 weeks before inclusion, were eligible for this cross-sectional study. Severe adult respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein antibody levels were determined by EliA SARS-CoV-2-Sp1 IgG test (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Phadia AB) and related to clinical and demographic parameters. Eighty-nine patients were included. Patients were vaccinated with two doses of Comirnaty (BNT162b2, 73%) or Spikevax (mRNA-1273, 23,6%). Three patients received combinations of different vaccines. Response rate (antibody titres >7 U/mL) was 89.9%, while 39.3% developed high antibody titres (>204 U/mL), 47 (43-50) days after the second dose. A previous COVID-19 infection associated with higher antibody titres (median (25th-75th percentile) 1558.5 (814.5-3,763.8) U/mL vs 87 (26-268) U/mL, P = .002), while time between vaccine doses did not differ between groups (P = .7). Increasing SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres were independently associated with increasing time between vaccine doses (B 0.241, P = .02), decreasing serum calcium levels (B -0.233, P = .007) and previous COVID-19 (B 1.078, P < .001). In conclusion, a longer interval between COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses, lower calcium and a previous COVID-19 infection were independently associated with a stronger immunologic vaccination response in haemodialysis patients. While the response rate was good, only a minority developed high antibody titres, 47 (43-50) days after the second vaccine dose.
| S-EPMC9115353 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBefore the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant arrived in Vietnam, case rates suggested seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was low. Beginning in March 2021, we assessed different dosing schedules and adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs).MethodsWe performed a prospective cohort study to estimate the prevalence of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 before and after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. We conducted antibody testing among HCWs in February 2021 (baseline), before the second dose (June-July 2021), and 1 and 3 months after the second dose. We detected antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 using Tetracore® FlexImmArray™, and surrogate neutralizing antibodies using GenScript cPass™. Neither assay can distinguish natural from vaccine-induced antibodies. We assessed AEFIs through interview post-dose 1 and 1-month post-dose 2.ResultsBefore vaccination, 1/617 participants (0.16%) had antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Of these 617, 405 were vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 with 4-8-week (60%), 9-12-week (27%), or ≥13-week (13%) intervals between the two doses. Three months following series completion, 99% and 97% of vaccinated participants had ≥1 sample with detectable antibodies and surrogate neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, respectively. We observed no significant differences among those with different dosing intervals at last follow up. All participants reported PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 during the study; 2 (0.5%) were laboratory-confirmed. AEFIs were more frequent post-dose 1 (81%) vs. post-dose 2 (21%).ConclusionsIn this population, regardless of dosing interval, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 induced antibodies within three months of the second dose. These findings may offer flexibility to policymakers when balancing programmatic considerations with vaccine effectiveness.
| S-EPMC9278177 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hemodialysis is a necessary treatment for end-stage kidney disease patients. It imposes undergoing three sessions of dialysis per week in a specialized center. Amid the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, precautionary measures were mandatory in all dialysis facilities and may have negatively impacted patients' well-being. This study aimed to uncover the scale of this effect. We performed a cross-sectional study of all patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis in two dialysis units (one urban and another rural). Patients with Alzheimer's disease were excluded. Patients filled a questionnaire including information on socio-demographics, factors related to the dialysis facility, and the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on their mental health. A total of 72 patients responded. Their median age was 70 (60.79) years. Of them, 68% were males, 71% were married, and 10% were living alone. Following the pandemic, 35% felt more anxious, with a higher incidence of anxiety in the rural unit (p=0.021). Half of them felt very limited in their relationships, and 29% were isolated from their families. In total, 98% of patients were satisfied with the staff support. The imposed preventive measures were perceived as very strict in 27% of the surveyed patients. The majority of the urban group were bothered for not eating during the session, and they felt significantly more stress than the rural group (p=0.001). The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic increased anxiety among hemodialysis patients from a rural setting. Stress was more prevalent in the urban group and most probably related to limitations in eating during sessions. The majority were satisfied with staff support.
| S-EPMC8485366 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health problem. Patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis are at a higher risk of infection and mortality than the general population. Worldwide, a vaccination campaign has been developed that has been shown to reduce severe infections and deaths in the general population. However, there are currently limited data on the clinical efficacy of vaccinations in the hemodialysis population.MethodsA national multicenter observational cohort was performed in Chile to evaluate the clinical efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in end-stage renal disease patients on chronic hemodialysis from February 2021 to August 2021. In addition, the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and CoronaVac (Sinovac) vaccines were evaluated. The efficacy of vaccination in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalizations, and deaths associated with COVID-19 was determined.ResultsA total of 12,301 patients were evaluated; 10,615 (86.3%) received a complete vaccination (2 doses), 490 (4.0%) received incomplete vaccination, and 1196 (9.7%) were not vaccinated. During follow-up, 1362 (11.0%) patients developed COVID-19, and 150 died (case fatality rate: 11.0%). The efficacy of the complete vaccination in preventing infection was 18.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]:11.8-23.8%), and prevention of death was 66.0% (95% CI:60.6-70.7%). When comparing both vaccines, BNT162b2 and CoronaVac were effective in reducing infection and deaths associated with COVID-19. Nevertheless, the BNT162b2 vaccine had higher efficacy in preventing infection (42.6% vs. 15.0%) and deaths (90.4% vs. 64.8%) compared to CoronaVac.ConclusionThe results of our study suggest that vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients on chronic hemodialysis was effective in preventing infection and death associated with COVID-19.
| S-EPMC9287586 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection results in both acute mortality and persistent and/or recurrent disease in patients with hematologic malignancies, but the drivers of persistent infection in this population are unknown. We found that B-cell lymphomas were at particularly high risk for persistent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positivity. Further analysis of these patients identified discrete risk factors for initial disease severity compared with disease chronicity. Active therapy and diminished T-cell counts were drivers of acute mortality in COVID-19-infected patients with lymphoma. Conversely, B cell-depleting therapy was the primary driver of rehospitalization for COVID-19. In patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 positivity, we observed high levels of viral entropy consistent with intrahost viral evolution, particularly in patients with impaired CD8+ T-cell immunity. These results suggest that persistent COVID-19 infection is likely to remain a risk in patients with impaired adaptive immunity and that additional therapeutic strategies are needed to enable viral clearance in this high-risk population. SIGNIFICANCE: We describe the largest cohort of persistent symptomatic COVID-19 infection in patients with lymphoid malignancies and identify B-cell depletion as the key immunologic driver of persistent infection. Furthermore, we demonstrate ongoing intrahost viral evolution in patients with persistent COVID-19 infection, particularly in patients with impaired CD8+ T-cell immunity.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1.
| S-EPMC8758535 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) have more inflammatory monocytes and less plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DCs) compared with healthy controls.Patients on HD who have a poor antibody response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine had fewer monocyte-derived DCs and conventional DCs compared with good responders.The defects in antigen presentation might be possible therapeutic targets to increase vaccine efficacy in HD patients.
| S-EPMC9717667 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThere is an increased risk of thrombotic complications in patients with COVID-19. Hemodialysis patients are already at an increased risk for thromboembolic events such as stroke and pulmonary embolism. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of late thrombotic complications (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, stroke, new-onset vascular access thrombosis) in maintenance hemodialysis patients after recovery from COVID-19.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 200 prevalent hemodialysis patients in our center at the start of the pandemic. We excluded incident patients after the cohort entry date and those who required hemodialysis for acute kidney injury, and excluded patients with less than 1 month follow-up due to kidney transplantation or death from non-thrombotic causes.FindingsOne-hundred and eighty five prevalent hemodialysis patients finally met the inclusion criteria; 37 patients (17.6%) had SARS-CoV-2 infection, out of which 10 (27%) died during the acute phase of disease without evidence of thrombotic events. There was an increased risk of thrombotic events in COVID-19 survivors compared to the non-infected cohort (18.5% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.002) after a median follow-up of 7 months. Multivariate regression analysis showed that COVID-19 infection increased risk for late thrombotic events adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, antithrombotic treatment, and previous thrombotic events (Odds Ratio (OR) 26.4, 95% confidence interval 2.5-280.6, p = 0.01). Clinical and laboratory markers did not predict thrombotic events.ConclusionsThere is an increased risk of late thrombotic complications in hemodialysis patients after infection with COVID-19. Further studies should evaluate the benefit of prolonged prophylactic anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients after recovery from COVID-19.
| S-EPMC8239758 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Individuals with comorbidities, such as chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis patients (HDP), are particularly susceptible to severe COVID-19 and to its complications. Furthermore, their immune response to vaccines is impaired, requiring tailored vaccination strategies. In this study, we investigated through transcriptomic profiling the immune response heterogeneity of HDP vaccinated with two doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine. Transcriptomic analyses were conducted in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected from HDP and healthy controls (HC) before and 7 days after each dose. The HDP were stratified into high- and low-responders based on their humoral response after the second dose. Significant differences in gene expression related to B cell abundance and regulation, CD4 T cell proliferation, and inflammation pathways were observed at baseline and day 7 between HDP-low responders and HC, while the HDP high-responders displayed an intermediate expression profile for these genes. Results were consistent with the known immunologic alterations occurring in HDP cohorts related to lymphopenia, chronic inflammation, and dysregulated proliferation of CD4+. Our analyses identified an early transcriptional signature correlated with a diminished immune response in HDP low-responders, highlighting the importance of conducting a characterization of immunocompromised cohorts.
2024-10-09 | GSE265975 | GEO
Project description:Vaccination with different vaccines has been implemented globally to counter the continuous COVID-19 pandemic. However, the vaccine-elicited antibodies have reduced efficiency against the highly mutated Omicron sub-variants. Previously, we developed a protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine called ZF2001, based on the dimeric receptor-binding domain (RBD). This vaccine has been administered using different dosing intervals in real-world setting. Some individuals received three doses of ZF2001, with a one-month interval between each dose, due to urgent clinical requirements. Others had an extended dosing interval of up to five months between the second and third dose, a standard vaccination regimen for the protein subunit vaccine against hepatitis B. In this study, we profile B cell responses in individuals who received three doses of ZF2001, and compared those with long or short dosing intervals. We observed that the long-interval group exhibited higher and broader serologic antibody responses. These responses were associated with the increased size and evolution of vaccine-elicited B-cell receptor repertoires, characterized by the elevation of expanded clonotypes and somatic hypermutations. Both groups of individuals generated substantial amounts of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) against various SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Omicron sub-variants such as XBB. These bnAbs target four antigenic sites within the RBD. To determine the vulnerable site of SARS-CoV-2, we employed cryo-electron microscopy to identify the epitopes of highly potent bnAbs that targeted two major sites. Our findings provide immunological insights into the B cell responses elicited by RBD-based vaccine, and suggest that a vaccination regimen of prolonging time interval should be used in practice.
| S-EPMC10382582 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC11843127 | biostudies-literature