Improved diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary malignant lesions with emphysema using a combination of radial endobronchial ultrasonography and rapid on-site evaluation
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Xie Q
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11337740 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:PurposeAlthough radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) has been used to investigate peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), its diagnostic performance without fluoroscopy remains unclear. We sought to determine the diagnostic yield of R-EBUS-guided transbronchial biopsy (TBB) without fluoroscopy.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature review using Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register. Then, we performed a proportional meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic yield of this modality. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to identify factors affecting the performance of R-EBUS-guided TBB without fluoroscopy.ResultsWe identified 31 studies consisting of a total of 6491 patients. Pooled overall diagnostic yield of R-EBUS-guided TBB without fluoroscopy was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.74). There was significant heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 89.45%, p < 0.001). In subgroup and meta-regression analyses, air bronchus sign on chest computed tomography scans, larger size PPLs, probe location within lesions, and heterogeneous echogenicity were associated with significantly higher diagnostic yield. Diagnostic yield from the upper lobe was statistically lower than that from the middle and lower lobes. Pooled pneumothorax rate was 0.01 (95% CI, 0.01-0.01, I2 = 63.51%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsR-EBUS-guided TBB without fluoroscopy appears to be a relatively useful tool with a low pneumothorax rate for the diagnosis of PPLs. Factors mentioned above may affect the diagnostic yield of this tool. Because of substantial between-study heterogeneity, our results should be interpreted with caution.
| S-EPMC9834691 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveWe design a prospective control study on the utilization of transbronchial cryobiopsy guided by EBUS-GS (EBUS-GS-TBCB) to diagnose PPLs.MethodsPPLs were defined as pulmonary nodules or masses with a diameter from 10 mm to 50 mm. PPLs were randomly divided into group EBUS-GS-TBCB and transbronchial biopsy by forceps guided under EBUS-GS (EBUS-GS-TBB).Results28 cases were involved in group EBUS-GS-TBCB and 31 cases were in group EBUS-GS-TBB. The mean sizes of PPLs were 30.23 ± 11.10 mm in group EBUS-GS-TBCB and 28.69 ± 8.62 mm in group EBUS-GS-TBB (t = 0.600, p=0.551). The diagnostic yields of EBUS-GS-TBCB and EBUS-GS-TBB were 75% and 64.52% respectively, and the difference between the two groups was not significant (χ 2 value = 0.137, p=0.711). If only the first specimen was taken into account, the diagnostic yields from EBUS-GS-TBCB and EBUS-GS-TBB were 64.29% (18/28 cases) and 35.48% (11/31 cases), respectively. The difference was statistically significant by Fisher's Exact Test (χ 2 value = 4.883, p=0.038). The total incidence rates of bleeding were 21.43% and 6.45%, respectively, in groups EBUS-GS-TBCB and EBUS-GS-TBB. The total incidence rates of pneumothorax were 7.14% and 0, respectively, in groups EBUS-GS-TBCB and EBUS-GS-TBB.ConclusionThe diagnostic yield of EBUS-GS-TBCB was slightly higher than that of EBUS-GS-TBB for the diagnosis of PPLs. EBUS-GS-TBCB might be useful if only the first sample was taken into account.
| S-EPMC8492292 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRadial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) improves the diagnostic yield from peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). However, the small specimens obtained using small forceps through a guide sheath (GS) may impede diagnosis and molecular analysis. Here, we investigated the diagnostic significance of additional conventional TBLB with standard forceps after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from 55 patients who underwent conventional TBLB after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB for PPL diagnosis. Procedures were performed on single PPLs with no visible lesions on bronchoscopy. In cases with inconclusive pathologic confirmation, final diagnoses were made based on pathologic specimens or clinical observations.ResultsThe median size of the target lesions was 28 mm. The appearances on computed tomography images were solid (n = 45, 81.8%), part-solid (n = 7, 12.7%), and cavitary nodules (n = 3, 5.5%). A computed tomography bronchus sign was present in 35 (63.6%) cases, and a radial probe was positioned within target lesion in 32 (58.2%) cases. R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB was diagnostic in 30 (54.5%) patients, and subsequent conventional TBLB yielded additional diagnostic information in 8 (14.5%) patients. Probe positioning within target lesions and the outer margin of PPLs more than 1 cm from pleura were significantly associated with enhanced diagnostic yield from the combined procedures. In conventional TBLB, probe positioning within target lesions (75.0% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.004) and characteristic of nonsolid nodules (83.3% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with additional diagnostic utility.ConclusionsConventional TBLB following R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB could be a useful procedure for diagnosing PPLs, especially for nonsolid nodules.Key pointsSignificant findings of the study: Additional conventional TBLB with standard forceps after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB yielded an additional 14.5% diagnostic utility for peripheral pulmonary lesions. For conventional TBLB, probe positioning within target lesions and nonsolid nodules were significantly associated with additional diagnostic utility.What this study addsConventional TBLB with standard forceps after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB is an effective and economically accessible diagnostic tool for peripheral pulmonary lesions.
| S-EPMC7263016 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9945376 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundGenerally, structural destruction of lung parenchyma, such as pulmonary emphysema, is considered to be related to the low diagnostic yields and high complication rates of lung biopsies of peripheral lung lesions. Currently, little is known about the clinical outcomes of using endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) to diagnose peripheral lesions in patients with emphysema.MethodsThis retrospective study was performed to identify the clinical outcomes of EBUS-GS in patients with pulmonary emphysema. This study included 393 consecutive patients who received EBUS-GS between February 2017 and April 2018. The patients were classified according to the severity of their emphysema, and factors possibly contributing to a successful EBUS-GS procedure were evaluated.ResultsThe overall diagnostic yield of EBUS-GS in patients with no or mild emphysema was significantly higher than in those with moderate or severe pulmonary emphysema (78% vs. 61%, P = 0.007). There were no procedure-related complications. The presence of a bronchus sign on CT (P < 0.001) and a "within the lesion" status on EBUS (P = 0.009) were independently associated with a successful EBUS-GS procedure. Although the diagnostic yield of EBUS-GS in patients with moderate-to-severe emphysema was relatively low, a bronchus sign and "within the lesion" status on EBUS were contributing factors for a successful EBUS-GS.ConclusionsEBUS-GS is a safe procedure with an acceptable diagnostic yield, even when performed in patients with pulmonary emphysema. The presence of a bronchus sign and "within the lesion" status on EBUS were predictors of a successful procedure.
| S-EPMC6683511 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTransbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) is usually performed for a definite diagnosis. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasonography is often acknowledged as a good guidance method for TBLB as it can help physicians confirm the lesions' position. It is also a non-invasive imaging diagnostic method. This clinical study was designed to evaluate the ability of radial endobronchial ultrasonography (R-EBUS) to differentiate benign from malignant predominant solid PPLs based on imaging features.MethodsPatients with predominant solid PPLs were enrolled in this study retrospectively. TBLB was performed using R-EBUS with or without other guidance techniques. One typical sonographic image and one video of each lesion were recorded for analysis. Six radial probe endobronchial ultrasonographic image features (size, shape, echogenicity, margin, blood vessel, and linear-discrete air bronchogram) were studied by ultrasonography specialists and physicians who were blinded to the final diagnosis. The sum score model of the combined predictive factors indicated the best diagnostic accuracies for predicting malignant PPLs. The model group results were used to establish the diagnostic standard for a verification group.ResultsA total of 303 patients were enrolled in the model group from July 2018 to July 2019 at the Shanghai Chest Hospital (214 with malignant and 89 with benign lesions). The mean lesion long axis on computed tomographic images was 34.39±13.79 mm. There were significant statistical differences between benign and malignant lesions in the long axis, short axis, shape, margin, blood vessel, and linear-discrete air bronchogram assessed by radial endobronchial ultrasound. Long axis, lobulation, distinct but not sharp margin, absence of blood vessel, and absence of linear-discrete air bronchogram were good predictive factors of malignant lesions. A sum score model value of 79.54% of these combined factors indicated the best diagnostic accuracy for predicting malignant lesions. Eighty-seven patients were enrolled in the verification group from August to October 2019. The sum score model showed a diagnostic accuracy of 82.76%.ConclusionsRadial endobronchial ultrasonographic features can differentiate malignant from benign lesions and thus have potential diagnosis value in predominant solid PPLs.
| S-EPMC7797840 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe diagnostic yields and safety profiles of transbronchial lung biopsy have not been evaluated in inexperienced physicians using the combined modality of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and a guide sheath (EBUS-GS). This study assessed the utility and safety of EBUS-GS during the learning phase by referring to a database of performed EBUS-GS procedures.MethodsFrom December 2015 to January 2017, all of the consecutive patients who underwent EBUS-GS were registered. During the study period, two physicians with no previous experience performed the procedure. To assess the diagnostic yields, learning curve, and safety profile of EBUS-GS performed by these inexperienced physicians, the first 100 consecutive EBUS-GS procedures were included in the evaluation.ResultsThe overall diagnostic yield of EBUS-GS performed by two physicans in 200 patients with a peripheral lung lesion was 73.0%. Learning curve analyses showed that the diagnostic yields were stable, even when the procedure was performed by beginners. Complications related to EBUS-GS occurred in three patients (1.5%): pneumothorax developed in two patients (1%) and resolved spontaneously without chest tube drainage; another patient (0.5%) developed a pulmonary infection after EBUS-GS. There were no cases of pneumothorax requiring chest tube drainage, severe hemorrhage, respiratory failure, premature termination of the procedure, or procedure-related mortality.ConclusionsEBUS-GS is a safe and stable procedure with an acceptable diagnostic yield, even when performed by physicians with no previous experience.
| S-EPMC6090614 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10894385 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The aim of the present study was to determine the indications for radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy (rEBUS-D-TBLB) for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) located at the bronchopulmonary segments and subsegments. Data collected from 774 patients who underwent rEBUS-D-TBLB for suspected PPL, including clinical information, distribution of lesions, diagnostic spectrum and diagnostic rate, were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Additionally, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to analyze the diagnostic yield of lesions in bronchopulmonary subsegments under the lesion diameter limit of 3 cm. In total, 802 lesions were found in 774 patients. The diagnostic yield of rEBUS-D-TBLB for all lesions was 67.18%. Overall, 362 cases of malignant disease and 158 cases of benign disease were diagnosed, with sensitivities of 70.98 and 79.00% respectively. Lesions were distributed throughout the 18 bronchopulmonary segments of the lungs. The bronchopulmonary segments with >5% of the majority of the discovered lesions were LB1+2, LB3, LB6, LB10, RB1-4 and RB9. The diagnostic yield of rEBUS-D-TBLB was found to be >65% for lesions located at LB3, RB1-3 and RB9. Further rEBUS-D-TBLB examinations of the LB1+2a, LB6a and RB4b segments produced diagnostic yields of 81.25, 66.67 and 71.43% respectively. Finally, at segment RB4a, rEBUS-D-TBLB examination was more effective for lesions with diameters >3 cm compared with lesions with diameters <3 cm. The diagnostic yields for PPL distributed at LB1+2a, LB3, LB6a, RB1-3, RB4a (diameter >3 cm), RB4b, and RB9 using rEBUS-D-TBLB were higher compared with for other segments, providing a theoretical basis for the clinical application of rEBUS-D-TBLB for the diagnosis of PPL in patients.
| S-EPMC7388566 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn flexible bronchoscopy, endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) has varying diagnostic yield depending on the findings of radial-endobronchial ultrasonography (R-EBUS). The diagnosis rate is lower when the ultrasound probe is "adjacent to", than when it is "within" the lesion. However, these findings are inconsistent, and the imaging status may change from "adjacent to" to "within" as examination progresses. In this study, we analyzed the predictive factors for this change, which remain unexplored till date.MethodsPatients who underwent flexible bronchoscopic biopsy with EBUS-GS at Kameda Medical Centre between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients without "adjacent to" lesions were excluded. The appearance of "A to W" (the change from "adjacent to" to "within" imaging status) was the primary outcome. Based on multivariate regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we evaluated the discriminative properties of the factors strongly correlated with "A to W".ResultsIn total, 260 patients were included in this study. In 84 cases, the R-EBUS findings were "A to W". No such findings were observed in 176 cases. The mean lesion diameter was significantly larger (P=0.021) in the group with "A to W" than in the group without. The odds ratio [1.023 (1.003-1.046)] for lesion diameter showed statistical significance in the multivariable regression model. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.346 and 0.852, respectively, at the optimal threshold (29.25 mm) set using the Youden index.ConclusionsWe found that lesion diameter was a significant factor in predicting "A to W", with a cut-off value of 29.25 mm and high specificity (0.852).
| S-EPMC10894430 | biostudies-literature