Project description:BackgroundRadial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) improves the diagnostic yield from peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). However, the small specimens obtained using small forceps through a guide sheath (GS) may impede diagnosis and molecular analysis. Here, we investigated the diagnostic significance of additional conventional TBLB with standard forceps after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from 55 patients who underwent conventional TBLB after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB for PPL diagnosis. Procedures were performed on single PPLs with no visible lesions on bronchoscopy. In cases with inconclusive pathologic confirmation, final diagnoses were made based on pathologic specimens or clinical observations.ResultsThe median size of the target lesions was 28 mm. The appearances on computed tomography images were solid (n = 45, 81.8%), part-solid (n = 7, 12.7%), and cavitary nodules (n = 3, 5.5%). A computed tomography bronchus sign was present in 35 (63.6%) cases, and a radial probe was positioned within target lesion in 32 (58.2%) cases. R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB was diagnostic in 30 (54.5%) patients, and subsequent conventional TBLB yielded additional diagnostic information in 8 (14.5%) patients. Probe positioning within target lesions and the outer margin of PPLs more than 1 cm from pleura were significantly associated with enhanced diagnostic yield from the combined procedures. In conventional TBLB, probe positioning within target lesions (75.0% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.004) and characteristic of nonsolid nodules (83.3% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with additional diagnostic utility.ConclusionsConventional TBLB following R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB could be a useful procedure for diagnosing PPLs, especially for nonsolid nodules.Key pointsSignificant findings of the study: Additional conventional TBLB with standard forceps after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB yielded an additional 14.5% diagnostic utility for peripheral pulmonary lesions. For conventional TBLB, probe positioning within target lesions and nonsolid nodules were significantly associated with additional diagnostic utility.What this study addsConventional TBLB with standard forceps after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB is an effective and economically accessible diagnostic tool for peripheral pulmonary lesions.
Project description:BackgroundTransbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) was a useful method for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs), but the smaller tissue samples obtained often could not meet the subsequent molecular pathological diagnosis. The purposes of this study were to assess the diagnostic yield of virtual bronchoscope navigation (VBN) combined with radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) guided transbronchial cryo-biopsy (TBCB) and to compare it with TBLB.MethodsPatients with PPNs, who planned to undergo bronchoscopy and were admitted to Henan Provincial People's Hospital and Zhoukou Central Hospital from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, were divided into the TBCB group (experimental group) and TBLB group (control group) using the block randomization method. TBCB and TBLB were performed with the guidance of VBN-rEBUS. The diagnostic yields, complications, specimen surface areas, and operation times were observed. The differences between the two groups were measured by the independent sample t-test or Chi-square test.ResultsA total of 152 patients were enrolled, of whom 138 completed the study, and 102 received a definite diagnosis by bronchoscopy. The diagnostic yield showed no statistically significant difference between TBCB group and TBLB group (79.1% vs. 69.0%, P=0.124). For PPNs with the diameter <2 cm, TBCB group had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than TBLB group (76.5% vs. 50.0%, P=0.022); For PPNs with eccentric and adjacent radial ultrasonic images, TBCB group also had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than TBLB group (78.1% vs. 55.9%, P=0.023). The specimen surface area of TBCB group was larger than that of TBLB group (P=0.030). The incidence of moderate bleeding in TBCB group was higher than that in TBLB group (P=0.006), but no serious complications were observed in either group.ConclusionsAlthough the incidence rate of moderate bleeding was higher than that of TBLB, VBN-rEBUS guided TBCB is still a safe and effective diagnostic method for PPNs, and is superior to TBLB for PPNs with a diameter <2 cm or with an eccentric and adjacent radial ultrasonic image.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100054949.
Project description:PurposeEndobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is widely used for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. However, evidence of its usefulness for re-biopsy in treated lung cancer, especially according to the previous treatment, is limited. We evaluated the role of EBUS-TBNA for re-biopsy and its diagnostic values in patients with different treatment histories.Materials and methodsWe reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for re-biopsy of suspicious recurrent or progressive lesions between January 2006 and December 2016 at the National Cancer Center in South Korea. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the previous treatment modalities: surgery, radiation, and palliation.ResultsAmong the 367 patients (surgery, n=192; radiation, n=40; palliation, n=135) who underwent EBUS-TBNA for re-biopsy, the overall sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in detecting malignancy were 95.6%, 82.7%, and 96.3%, respectively. The sensitivity was lower in the radiation group (83.3%) when compared with the surgery (95.7%, p=0.042) and palliation (97.7%, p=0.012) groups. The NPV was lower in the palliation group (50.0%) than in the surgery group (88.5%, p=0.042). The sample adequacy of EBUS-TBNA specimens was lower in the radiation group (80.3%) than in the surgery (95.4%, p < 0.001) or palliation (97.8%, p < 0.001) groups. EGFR mutation analysis was feasible in 94.6% of the 92 cases, in which mutation analysis was requested. There were no major complications. Minor complications were reported in 12 patients (3.3%).ConclusionEBUS-TBNA showed high diagnostic values and high suitability for EGFR mutation analysis with regard to re-biopsy in patients with previously treated lung cancer. The sensitivity was lower in the radiation group and NPV was lower in the palliation group. The complication rate was low.
Project description:The aim of the present study was to determine the indications for radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy (rEBUS-D-TBLB) for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) located at the bronchopulmonary segments and subsegments. Data collected from 774 patients who underwent rEBUS-D-TBLB for suspected PPL, including clinical information, distribution of lesions, diagnostic spectrum and diagnostic rate, were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Additionally, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to analyze the diagnostic yield of lesions in bronchopulmonary subsegments under the lesion diameter limit of 3 cm. In total, 802 lesions were found in 774 patients. The diagnostic yield of rEBUS-D-TBLB for all lesions was 67.18%. Overall, 362 cases of malignant disease and 158 cases of benign disease were diagnosed, with sensitivities of 70.98 and 79.00% respectively. Lesions were distributed throughout the 18 bronchopulmonary segments of the lungs. The bronchopulmonary segments with >5% of the majority of the discovered lesions were LB1+2, LB3, LB6, LB10, RB1-4 and RB9. The diagnostic yield of rEBUS-D-TBLB was found to be >65% for lesions located at LB3, RB1-3 and RB9. Further rEBUS-D-TBLB examinations of the LB1+2a, LB6a and RB4b segments produced diagnostic yields of 81.25, 66.67 and 71.43% respectively. Finally, at segment RB4a, rEBUS-D-TBLB examination was more effective for lesions with diameters >3 cm compared with lesions with diameters <3 cm. The diagnostic yields for PPL distributed at LB1+2a, LB3, LB6a, RB1-3, RB4a (diameter >3 cm), RB4b, and RB9 using rEBUS-D-TBLB were higher compared with for other segments, providing a theoretical basis for the clinical application of rEBUS-D-TBLB for the diagnosis of PPL in patients.
Project description:BackgroundEndobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) elastography has been used in EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) to identify malignant lymph nodes based on tissue stiffness. Rapid onsite cytological evaluation (ROSE) has been widely utilized for onsite evaluation of sample adequacy and for guiding sampling during EBUS-TBNA. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of combined EBUS elastography and ROSE in evaluating mediastinal and hilar lymph node status.MethodsRetrospective chart review was performed from December 2018 to September 2020. Patient demographics, EBUS elastography scores, and ROSE, pathologic, and clinical outcome data were collected. The EBUS elastography scores were classified as follows: Type 1, predominantly nonblue; Type 2, partially blue and partially nonblue; and Type 3, predominantly blue. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for evaluation of malignant lymph nodes among the EBUS elastography, ROSE, and EBUS combined with ROSE groups.ResultsA total of 245 patients (345 lymph nodes) were included. The sensitivity and specificity of the EBUS elastography group for the diagnosis of malignant lymph nodes were 90.51% and 57.26%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity in the ROSE group were 96.32% and 79.05%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of EBUS elastography combined with ROSE were 86.61%, 92.65%, 11.78, and 0.14, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.942.ConclusionsCombining EBUS elastography and ROSE significantly increased the diagnostic value of EBUS-TBNA in evaluating mediastinal and hilar lymph node status compared to each method alone.
Project description:BackgroundTransbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is a novel technology in which a cryoprobe is used to obtain large tissue samples from the lungs of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) and peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of TBLC in the diagnosis of peripheral lung diseases in the Endoscopy Center of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Further, the application value of radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) used to determine the optimal area for cryobiopsy was evaluated in this study.MethodsIn this retrospective study, the data of patients with unclarified ILDs or PPLs who underwent TBLC guided by R-EBUS between April 2020 and December 2021 at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital in China were analyzed.ResultsA total of 137 patients [72 men, 65 women; median age, 52 years (range, 24-76 years)] were enrolled in the study. Out of the 137 patients included in the study, 123 (89.8%) were diagnosed after multidisciplinary discussions (MDDs), including 105 (85.4%) with ILD, 10 (8.1%) with tuberculosis, and 8 (6.5%) with a malignant tumor. Sixty-five (47.4%) patients had a definitive pathologic diagnosis through TBLC, including 54 (83.1%) with ILD, 5 (7.7%) with tuberculosis and 6 (9.2%) with malignant tumors. The overall pathological diagnosis rate was 47.4%. In addition to clarifying the blood supply situation of the candidate target, R-EBUS detected lesions in 44 (32.1%) patients. Mild and moderate bleeding occurred in 75.2% and 24.8% of patients, respectively. No cases of severe bleeding were observed. Pneumothorax occurred in 6 (4.4%) patients, of which 2 recovered without additional treatment, and 4 (66.7%) needed closed thoracic drainage. Hydropneumothorax and mediastinal emphysema occurred in one patient each. No patients died due to TBLC.ConclusionsR-EBUS-guided TBLC is safe and effective for the diagnosis of lung diseases, including ILDs and other PPLs. R-EBUS can guide cryobiopsy and avoid the potential risk of severe bleeding as well as radiation exposure. The pathological diagnosis rate of ILDs is relatively low, and MDD plays an important role in the diagnosis of ILDs.