Dataset Information

Predictors of postoperative lumpectomy size in breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Oncoplastic reconstructive surgery as an extension of breast-conserving surgery leads to better aesthetic results, an increase in tumor-free margins, and a reduction of re-excision rates. However, oncologic resection is often more extensive than expected, sometimes resulting in the plastic surgeon deviating from the predetermined plan. For optimal planning of the reconstruction, it is mandatory to estimate volume defects after lumpectomy as accurately as possible. This study aims to find preoperative predictors of lumpectomy resection size.

Methods

All consecutive patients diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma or carcinoma in situ and treated primarily with breast-conserving surgery between 2018 and 2020 at the University Medical Center Utrecht and Alexander Monro Hospital were included. Variables measured were patient characteristics and tumor characteristics. Data was analyzed in a multiple linear regression analysis.

Results

A total of 423 cases (410 patients) were included, with a median age of 58 (range 32-84) and a mean BMI of 25.0 (SD=9.3). The mean maximum radiological tumor diameter was 18.0 mm (SD=13.2), and the mean maximum lumpectomy diameter was 58.8 mm (SD=19.2). Multiple linear regression analysis found an explained variance of R 2 = 0.60 (p = < .00), corrected for operating surgeon. Significant predictors for postoperative lumpectomy size were BMI, breast size, and maximum preoperative radiological tumor diameter. Moreover, a predictive tool for lumpectomy size was developed and a web-based application was created on www.evidencio.com under the title ''Predicted lumpectomy size'', to facilitate the use of our tool in a clinical setting.

Conclusion

Postoperative lumpectomy size can be predicted with BMI, breast size and radiological tumor size. This model could be beneficial for (plastic) breast surgeons in planning reconstructions and to prepare and inform their patients more accurately.

SUBMITTER: Makineli S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11346708 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Predictors of Lumpectomy Size after Breast-Conserving Surgery in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Makineli Seher S Strijbis Rogier R Tsehaie Jonathan J Schellekens Pascal P A PPA Moman Maaike R MR Veenendaal Liesbeth M LM Ferdinandus Patrick I PI Witkamp Arjen J AJ Richir Milan C MC Maarse Wies W

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 20230926 3

<h4>Background</h4>Oncoplastic reconstructive surgery as an extension of breast-conserving surgery leads to better aesthetic results, an increase in tumor-free margins, and a reduction in reexcision rates. Oncologic resection is often more extensive than expected, sometimes resulting in the plastic surgeon deviating from the predetermined plan. For optimal planning of the reconstruction, it is mandatory to estimate volume defects after lumpectomy as accurately as possible. The authors aimed to i ...[more]

PMID: 37749793

Similar Datasets

Project description:Intraoperative frozen-section analysis of the lumpect-omy margin during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is an excellent method in obtaining a clear resection margin. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of intraoperative circumferential frozen-section analysis (IOCFS) of lumpectomy margin during BCS for breast cancer, and to find factors that increase the conversion into mastectomy.From 2007 to 2011, 509 patients with breast cancer underwent IOCFS during BCS. The outer surfaces of the shaved lumpectomy margins were evaluated. A negative margin was defined as no ink on the tumor. All margins were evaluated using the permanent section analysis.Among the 509 patients, 437 (85.9%) underwent BCS and 72 (14.1%) finally underwent mastectomy. Of the 483 pathologically confirmed patients, 338 (70.0%) were true-negative, 24 (5.0%) false-negative, 120 (24.8%) true-positive, and 1 (0.2%) false-positive. Twenty-four patients (4.7%) among total 509 patients had undetermined margins as either atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ in the first IOCFS. The IOCFS has an accuracy of 94.8% with 83% sensitivity, 99.7% specificity, 93.4% negative predictive value, and 99.2% positive predictive value. Sixty-three cases (12.4%) were converted to mastectomy, the first intraoperatively. Of the 446 (87.6%) patients who successfully underwent BCS, 64 patients received additional excisions and 32 were reoperated to achieve clear margin (reoperation rate, 6.3%). Twenty-three of the reoperated patients underwent re-excisions using the second intraoperative frozen section analysis, and achieved BCS. Nine cases were additionally converted to mastectomy. No significant differences in age, stage, and biological factors were found between the BCS and mastectomy cases. Factors such as invasive lobular carcinoma, multiple tumors, large tumor, and multiple excisions increased the conversion to mastectomy.The IOCFS analysis during BCS is useful in evaluating lumpectomy margins and preventing reoperation.

Project description:BackgroundThe prognosis of multifocal multicentric breast cancer (MIBC) was related to many factors, and there are different recommendations for surgical approaches. We compare the effects of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy on the survival of multifocal multicenter breast cancer female patients.MethodsA total of 38,164 female patients with pathologically confirmed multifocal multicenter invasive breast cancer from 2000 to 2018 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were extracted, and the effects of different factors on the survival of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a BCS group and a mastectomy group, and the differences of breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsOf the 38,164 patients included in the analysis, 14,533 (38.08%) underwent BCS and 23,631 (61.92%) underwent mastectomy. Multivariate analysis showed that age, grading, staging, number of lesions, radiotherapy, and BCS would affect the independent factors of BCSS and OS in patients. The median follow-up time was 108 months [interquartile range (IQR): 64-162 months). Multifactorial Cox proportional model analysis of prognostic risk showed that BCS reduced BCSS in patients older than 70 years [hazard ratio (HR): 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-1.53; P<0.001], stage I and II, positive hormone receptor (HR), all 2-3 lesions, no radiotherapy (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.33-1.6; P<0.001) and no chemotherapy (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.28-1.57; P<0.001); BCS also reduced OS in patients over 40 years of age, stages I, II, and IIIC, all molecular subtypes, all HR-positive or negative, 2-3 lesions, and no radiotherapy (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.31-1.46; P<0.001) and no chemotherapy (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.29-1.44; P<0.001) patients. Multivariate Cox regression showed that BCS is an adverse factor for BCSS [adjusted HR 1.2 (1.11-1.3), P<0.001] and OS [adjusted HR 1.24 (1.19-1.3), P<0.001].ConclusionsIn early, good prognosis, treatment-sensitive patients, there is no survival advantage for BCS and more BCSS and OS benefit for mastectomy patients.

Project description:IntroductionBreast Conserving Surgery (BCS) with whole breast radiation is now standard of care as a safer alternative to Mastectomy in terms of loco-regional recurrence and long-term survival. Despite this, a frequent pitfall of conventional BCS is positive surgical margins and need for second surgery with a reported frequency of 12-59 % in literature. Oncoplastic Surgery can be a safer, more cost effective alternate to conventional BCS owing to its higher rate of negative surgical margins (4-6% vs 12-59 %) and better cosmetic results. We aim to prove utility of Oncoplastic surgery for Low-Middle income countries.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine Oncoplastic Surgery as a more appropriate alternative to Conventional Breast Conserving Surgery for Low-Middle Income countries in terms of its lower positive margins and re-excision rates.MethodologyA retrospective comparative single center study by reviewing patient's medical records from August 2016 to June 2020 was conducted. Rate of positive margins and re-excisions along with mean volume of resection specimen, mean tumor size and quadrant dealt by both surgical procedures were compared.ResultsOut of 421 patients 249 patients underwent oncoplastic surgery and were compared with 173 patients who had conventional breast conserving surgery. Positive margins were seen in 5 patients (2 %) in OPS group whereas in 31 (17.9 %) patients in BCS group (p value < 0.001). Therefore, 2 from OPS group and 17 from BCS group underwent re-excision (p value < 0.002).None in OPS group while 7 out of 17 patients in BCS group underwent mastectomy as second procedure. Mean tumor size in OPS group was 2.26 cm ± SD 1.66 and in BCS group was 1.94 cm ± SD 1.28. Majority of Lobular carcinoma and Ductal carcinoma in-situ, multifocal, upper inner and central quadrant tumors and those unresponsive to neo-adjuvant therapy were treated by Oncoplastic techniques.ConclusionOncoplastic surgery has shown promising results as a safer tool to deal with large, complex tumors, lesions in difficult anatomical locations, multifocal or progressing on neo-adjuvant therapy. With its low Re-excision rates, it is a better alternative to traditional Breast Conserving approach for overburdened and resource limited health care system of Low-Middle Income countries. Multi-center, prospective trials are needed to determine its feasibility.