Dataset Information

Impact of the First Twenty-Four-Hour Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve/Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Vancomycin on Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Vancomycin regimens are designed to achieve an area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) ratio ranging between 400 and 600 µg·h/mL in the steady state. However, in cases of critical infections such as bacteremia requiring an early treatment approach, the clinical course may be affected by the AUC/MIC before reaching the steady state, that is, the AUC/MIC values 24 h after the first dose (first 24-h AUC/MIC). This study evaluated the relationship between the first 24-h AUC/MIC and the clinical course of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with MRSA bacteremia in a university hospital between 2015 and 2022. The first 24-h AUC/MIC cutoff was set at 300 µg·h/mL based on the results of early response, and eligible patients were divided into groups with a first 24-h AUC/MIC either < 300 µg·h/mL (< 300 group, n = 32) or ≥ 300 µg·h/mL (≥ 300 group, n = 38). The primary endpoint was the rate of treatment efficacy, and the secondary endpoints were time to clinical and bacteriological improvement and 30-day survival rate.

Results

Treatment efficacy and 30-day survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups (78.1% vs. 79.0%, P = 0.933 and 83.9% vs. 87.2%, P = 0.674, respectively). Among patients who showed treatment efficacy, the median time to clinical and bacteriological improvement was 11.5 days and 8.0 days in the < 300 and ≥ 300 groups, respectively; compared to the ≥ 300 group, the < 300 group had a significantly longer time to improvement (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

The first 24-h AUC/MIC had no effect on the treatment efficacy and 30-day survival rates. However, the time to clinical and bacteriological improvement was significantly prolonged in the < 300 group, indicating that the first 24-h AUC/MIC does not affect the rate of therapeutic efficacy but may affect the treatment period.

SUBMITTER: Higashi M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11349129 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of the First Twenty-Four-Hour Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve/Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Vancomycin on Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia.

Higashi Mika M Nakano Takafumi T Sato Keisuke K Eguchi Yukiomi Y Moriwaki Norihiro N Kamada Mitsuhiro M Ikeuchi Tadahiro T Kaneshige Susumu S Uchiyama Masanobu M Hayashi Toshinobu T Togawa Atsushi A Matsuo Koichi K Kamimura Hidetoshi H

Journal of clinical medicine research 20240810 7-8

<h4>Background</h4>Vancomycin regimens are designed to achieve an area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) ratio ranging between 400 and 600 µg·h/mL in the steady state. However, in cases of critical infections such as bacteremia requiring an early treatment approach, the clinical course may be affected by the AUC/MIC before reaching the steady state, that is, the AUC/MIC values 24 h after the first dose (first 24-h AUC/MIC). This study evaluated the rel ...[more]

PMID: 39206105

Similar Datasets

Project description:AIM:To develop a vancomycin population pharmacokinetic model and assess the probability of attaining a pharmacodynamic target associated with clinical and microbiological success, a ratio of the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ? 400, in a 5-year clinical cohort of preterm and term neonatal patients with late-onset staphylococcal sepsis. METHODS:Therapeutic drug monitoring data were obtained from septic neonates with ?1 vancomycin concentration(s) from January 2006 to September 2011. Only neonates with a postnatal age of >72 hours and a positive microbiological culture were included. Population pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM 7.2). Eleven demographic characteristics were evaluated as covariates. Probabilities of achieving the pharmacodynamic target were evaluated. RESULTS:A 1-compartment model with first-order elimination was constructed from 528 vancomycin concentrations collected from 152 preterm and term neonates. Body weight, creatinine clearance (CL), and postmenstrual age were identified as significant covariates. Estimated vancomycin CL and volume of distribution for typical neonates were 0.068 ± 0.03 L·h·kg and 0.62 ± 0.13 L/kg, respectively. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (85.5%) and Staphylococcus aureus (14.5%) were the common pathogenic organisms. The distribution of vancomycin MIC breakpoints was composed of approximately 70% MIC breakpoint of ?2 mcg/mL. Approximately 54% of neonates, with a median serum creatinine concentration of 0.44 mg/dL, achieved the target ratio of 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve to the MIC ? 400 with a median daily dose of 30 (interquartile range, 21-42) mg/kg. CONCLUSIONS:Body weight, creatinine CL, and postmenstrual age significantly influenced vancomycin CL. The current vancomycin doses are acceptable at MICs ?1 mcg/mL because they are likely to achieve the pharmacodynamic target in the majority of neonatal patients, although higher doses may be considered for more resistant staphylococcal infections.

Project description:Background Current guidelines for the therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin recommend dosing based on the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to achieve clinical efficacy while reducing nephrotoxicity. Although a wide range of nephrotoxicity thresholds have been reported, few studies have documented clinical outcomes based on AUC-guided vancomycin dosing in Korea. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate whether a relationship exists between AUC and treatment outcomes in vancomycin treated patients in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Furthermore, this study tries to estimate AUC threshold for treatment failure and nephrotoxicity. Methods The records of adult patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia treated with vancomycin for ≥72 hours without dialysis between April 2013 and April 2021, were reviewed retrospectively. Treatment success was defined as defervescence and blood culture sterilization by day 7. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine levels ≥0.3 mg/dL or a 50% increase from baseline on 2 consecutive days. Bayesian estimation was used to predict individual vancomycin AUC. Both classification and regression tree and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to estimate the optimal AUC thresholds for vancomycin efficacy and nephrotoxicity. Results Of 118 patients, 61 (51.7%) experienced treatment failure and 42 (35.6%) developed acute kidney injury. The vancomycin AUC threshold for predicting acute kidney injury was 615.0 mg· hr/L. In the multivariate analysis, AUC ≥615.0 mg· hr/L was a significant risk factor for nephrotoxicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 5.24; 95% CI, 1.8–14.65). The lower threshold for treatment failure was not defined because it was not statistically significant. Risk factors for treatment failure included low body mass index (aOR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70–0.96), severity of acute illness represented by complicated infection (aOR = 77.56; 95% CI, 16.7–359.4) and comorbidities, such as solid organ tumors (aOR = 6.61; 95% CI, 1.19–36.81) and cerebrovascular disease (aOR = 6.05; 95% CI, 1.17–31.23). Conclusions Although AUC-guided vancomycin dosing was associated with a reduced risk of acute kidney injury, its ability to predict clinical outcomes was modest. Further studies are needed to define the AUC therapeutic range to maximize efficacy and minimize nephrotoxicity. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2023; 83:XXX–XXX)

Project description:BACKGROUND:Vancomycin is the standard first-line treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. However, recent consensus guidelines recommend that clinicians consider using alternative agents such as daptomycin when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration is greater than 1 ug/ml. To date however, there have been no head-to-head randomized trials comparing the safety and efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the treatment of such infections. The primary aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin versus vancomycin in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (greater than or equal to 1.5 ug/ml) in terms of reducing all-cause 60-day mortality. METHODS/DESIGN:The study is designed as a multicenter prospective open label phase IIB pilot randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants will be inpatients over 21-years-old with a positive blood culture for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of greater than or equal to 1.5 ug/ml. Randomization into intervention or active control arms will be performed with a 1:1 allocation ratio. We aim to recruit 50 participants over a period of two years. Participants randomized to the active control arm will receive vancomycin dose-while those randomized to the intervention arm will receive daptomycin. Participants will receive a minimum of 14 days study treatment.The primary analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat principle. The Fisher's exact test will be used to compare the 60-day mortality rate from index blood cultures (primary endpoint) between the two treatment arms, and the exact two-sided 95% confidence interval will be calculated using the Clopper and Pearson method. Primary analysis will be conducted using a two sided alpha of 0.05. DISCUSSION:If results from this pilot study suggest that daptomycin shows significant efficacy in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations, we aim to proceed with a larger scale confirmatory study. This would help guide clinicians and inform practice guidelines on the optimal treatment for such infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION:The trial is listed on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01975662, date of registration: 29 October 2013).