A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Comparing Analytic and Holistic Marking Rubrics in Medical Research Education.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

The use of analytic rubrics in assessing and grading students' performance has become more prominent among instructors due to its reliability and validity in ensuring consistency in student evaluation. However, there is limited evidence demonstrating the consistency of examiner judgments between analytic marking rubrics and holistic marking rubrics.

Methods

Therefore, we aimed to compare the consistency of marks given using holistic marking methods and analytic rubrics at an Australian university by analyzing the mean mark differences and number of adjudications between two rubric types as well as the inter-rater reliability between two assessors. We analyzed all scores for project manuscripts between 2016 and 2021 for Honours medical students. We compared the mea

SUBMITTER: Yeo SW 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11359436 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature