Even laypeople use legalese.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Whereas principles of communicative efficiency and legal doctrine dictate that laws be comprehensible to the common world, empirical evidence suggests legal documents are largely incomprehensible to lawyers and laypeople alike. Here, a corpus analysis (n = 59) million words) first replicated and extended prior work revealing laws to contain strikingly higher rates of complex syntactic structures relative to six baseline genres of English. Next, two preregistered text generation experiments (n = 286) tested two leading hypotheses regarding how these complex structures enter into legal documents in the first place. In line with the magic spell hypothesis, we found people tasked with writing official laws wrote in a more convoluted manner than when tasked with writing uno
SUBMITTER: Martinez E
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11363274 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA