Dataset Information

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Devices for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Management in Breast Radiation Therapy: Results of the BRAVEHeart Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The Breast Radiotherapy Audio Visual Enhancement for sparing the Heart (BRAVEHeart) trial prospectively randomized patients with left-sided breast cancer to 1 of 2 deep inspiration breath hold biofeedback devices: a novel chest surface tracking system and an abdominal block tracking system. The primary hypothesis was that the accuracy of chest tracking would be higher than that of abdominal tracking as the chest is a more direct surrogate of the breast target.

Methods and materials

Patients with left-sided breast cancer were treated in deep inspiration breath hold with intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery. Patients were randomized to either the novel chest surface system or abdominal block system for active management of breath hold with visual feedback. On both trial arms, the unallocated system was monitored passively. A total of 239,296 cine electronic portal imaging device images were analyzed retrospectively to extract the chest wall position. Treatment accuracy was quantified as the deviation of the internal chest wall during treatment relative to the planned position from the digitally reconstructed radiograph. The correlation between motion of the external surrogate and internal chest wall was calculated per-breath hold. Ease of use was assessed with questionnaires for both radiation therapists and patients and appointment length recorded.

Results

Data from 26 participants were available for analysis. No difference was found in delivered treatment accuracy between arms. Across all patients and fractions, the median correlation between internal chest wall movement and external surrogate was 0.69 for the chest surface and 0.17 for the abdominal block. Patients found it easy to follow visual feedback from both systems. No difference was found in appointment length between arms.

Conclusions

No statistical evidence was found for superior treatment accuracy, satisfaction, or appointment length for the novel chest surface tracking device compared with the abdominal block system. During deep inspiration breath hold, the median per-breath hold correlation of internal chest wall movement to the motion of the chest surface was higher than the median correlation of the abdominal block to the chest surface.

SUBMITTER: Byrne HL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11364044 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Devices for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Management in Breast Radiation Therapy: Results of the BRAVEHeart Trial.

Byrne Hilary L HL Steiner Elisabeth E Booth Jeremy J Lamoury Gillian G Morgia Marita M Carroll Susan S Richardson Kylie K Ambrose Leigh L Makhija Kuldeep K Stanton Cameron C Zwan Benjamin B Carr Michael M Stewart Maegan M Bromley Regina R Atyeo John J Silvester Shona S Plant Natalie N Keall Paul P

Advances in radiation oncology 20240715 9

<h4>Purpose</h4>The Breast Radiotherapy Audio Visual Enhancement for sparing the Heart (BRAVEHeart) trial prospectively randomized patients with left-sided breast cancer to 1 of 2 deep inspiration breath hold biofeedback devices: a novel chest surface tracking system and an abdominal block tracking system. The primary hypothesis was that the accuracy of chest tracking would be higher than that of abdominal tracking as the chest is a more direct surrogate of the breast target.<h4>Methods and mate ...[more]

PMID: 39221134

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeRadiation therapy for tumors subject to breathing-related motion during breath-holds (BHs) has the potential to substantially reduce the irradiated volume. Mechanically assisted and noninvasive ventilation (MANIV) could ensure the target repositioning accuracy during each BH while facilitating treatment feasibility through oxygen supplementation and a perfectly replicated mechanical support. However, there is currently no clinical evidence substantiating the use of MANIV-induced BH for moving tumors. The aim of this work was, therefore, to evaluate the technique's performance under real treatment conditions.Methods and materialsPatients eligible for lung or liver stereotactic body radiation therapy were prospectively included in a single-arm trial. The primary endpoint corresponded to the treatment feasibility with MANIV. Secondary outcomes comprised intrafraction geometric uncertainties extracted from real-time imaging, tolerance to BH, and treatment time.ResultsTreatment was successfully delivered in 92.9% (13/14) of patients: 1 patient with a liver tumor was excluded because of a mechanically induced gastric insufflation displacing the liver cranially by more than 1 cm. In the left-right/anteroposterior/craniocaudal directions, the recalculated safety margins based on intrafraction positional data were 4.6 mm/5.1 mm/5.6 mm and 4.7 mm/7.3 mm/5.9 mm for lung and liver lesions, respectively. Compared with the free-breathing internal target volume and midposition approaches, the average reduction in the planning target volume with MANIV reached -47.2% ± 15.3%, P < .001, and -29.4% ± 19.2%, P = .007, for intrathoracic tumors and -23.3% ± 12.4%, P < .001, and -9.3% ± 15.3%, P = .073, for upper abdominal tumors, respectively. For 1 liver lesion, large caudal drifts of occasionally more than 1 cm were measured. The total slot time was 53.1 ± 10.6 minutes with a BH comfort level of 80.1% ± 10.6%.ConclusionsMANIV enables high treatment feasibility within a nonselected population. Accurate intrafraction tumor repositioning is achieved for lung tumors. Because of occasional intra-BH caudal drifts, pretreatment assessment of BH stability for liver lesions is, however, recommended.

Project description:BackgroundRadiation therapy is one of the essential treatment modalities for invasive thymomas. Clinically, respiratory motion poses a challenge for the radiotherapy of thoracic tumors. One method to address this issue is to train patients to hold their breath at the end of deep inspiration. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the dosimetric and clinical advantages of the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique in postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for thymomas.MethodsThymoma patients undergoing postoperative IMRT were included. Each patient underwent two computed tomography (CT) scans, one under free breath (FB) and the other under DIBH. Dosimetric parameters of organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated in three series plans. Dose analysis and volume comparisons were conducted during FB-3 mm (FB with 3 mm internal target volume margin), FB-10 mm (FB with 10 mm internal target volume margin), and DIBH and compared using a paired sample Student's t-test. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for lungs and heart were calculated and compared.ResultsThe total lung volume significantly increased by 31% (4,216±198 vs. 2,884±166 mL) and the heart volume reduced by 12% (552±25 vs. 636±35 mL) between DIBH acquisitions compared to FB. A significant improvement was observed in all the dosimetric parameters (Dmean, V20, V5) of the lung on DIBH compared to FB-3 mm (54%±2.85% vs. 47%±2.90%, P<0.001; 15%±1.37% vs. 12%±1.32%, P=0.004; and 10.28±0.58 vs. 8.76±0.57 Gy, P<0.001, respectively), as well as in the Dmax and D2% of the esophagus and spine. The lung volume increment was related to a reduction in the mean dose of lungs, with a correlation coefficient of r=0.27, P=0.03. The NTCP values for pneumonitis significantly reduced with DIBH compared to the FB state (0.6% vs. 1.1%, P<0.001).ConclusionsThe radiation dose to the OARs can be significantly reduced by using the DIBH technique in postoperative IMRT for thymomas. The increased volume of lungs using DIBH acquisitions can significantly reduce the incidence of pneumonitis.

Project description:PurposeDeep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and respiratory gating (RG) are widely used to reduce movement of target and healthy organs caused by breathing during irradiation. We hypothesized that accuracy and efficiency comparable to DIBH can be achieved with RG for pancreas treatment.Methods and materialsTwenty consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer treated with DIBH (eight) or RG (twelve) volumetric modulated arc therapy during 2017-2019 were included in this study, with radiopaque markers implanted near or in the targets. Seventeen patients received 25 fractions, while the other three received 15 fractions. Only patients who could not tolerate DIBH received RG treatment. While both techniques relied on respiratory signals from external markers, internal target motions were monitored with kV X-ray imaging during treatment. A 3-mm external gating window was used for DIBH treatment; RG treatment was centered on end-expiration with a duty cycle of 40%, corresponding to an external gating window of 2-3 mm. During dose delivery, kV images were automatically taken every 20◦ or 40◦ gantry rotation, from which internal markers were identified. The marker displacement from their initial positions and the residual motion amplitudes were calculated. For the analysis of treatment efficiency, the treatment time of every session was calculated from the motion management waveform files recorded at the treatment console.ResultsWithin one fraction, the displacement was 0-5 mm for DIBH and 0-6 mm for RG. The average magnitude of displacement for each patient during the entire course of treatment ranged 0-3 mm for both techniques. No statistically significant difference in displacement or residual motion was observed between the two techniques. The average treatment time was 15 min for DIBH and 17 min for RG, with no statistical significance.ConclusionsThe accuracy and efficiency were comparable between RG and DIBH treatment for pancreas irradiation. RG is a feasible alternative strategy to DIBH.

Dataset Information

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Devices for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Management in Breast Radiation Therapy: Results of the BRAVEHeart Trial.

Purpose

Methods and materials

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Devices for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Management in Breast Radiation Therapy: Results of the BRAVEHeart Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets