Evaluating Literature Reviews Conducted by Humans Versus ChatGPT: Comparative Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

With the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI), there is an increasing interest in their potential to assist in scholarly tasks, including conducting literature reviews. However, the efficacy of AI-generated reviews compared with traditional human-led approaches remains underexplored.

Objective

This study aims to compare the quality of literature reviews conducted by the ChatGPT-4 model with those conducted by human researchers, focusing on the relational dynamics between physicians and patients.

Methods

We included 2 literature reviews in the study on the same topic, namely, exploring factors affecting relational dynamics between physicians and patients in medicolegal contexts.

SUBMITTER: Mostafapour M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11369534 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature