A narrative review on synchronous concurrent versus delayed sequential surgery in the artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis implantation.

ABSTRACT:

Background and objective

In a patient who complains of both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and erectile dysfunction (ED), prosthetic surgery with a urinary continence device and penile prosthesis implant can offer a definitive solution to address both problems. The AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) device is considered the standard of care to restore SUI while the inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) device is thought to be superior to a malleable prosthesis to provide a more natural penile erection with higher patient satisfaction rates. The following article explores the current understanding of AMS 800 AUS surgery and IPP device in treating males with concurrent SUI and ED as well as evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of concurrent synchronous dual vs. d

SUBMITTER: Chung E 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11399055 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature