Comparative evaluation of commercially available AI-based cephalometric tracing programs.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Compare the accuracy and diagnostic concordance of three commercially available AI-based lateral cephalometric tracing software.

Materials and methods

Sixty-three lateral cephalometric radiographs were analyzed using semi-automatic (Dolphin Imaging Systems LLC) and AI-based software programs (WebCeph™, Cephio, and Ceppro DDH Inc.). Intra- and inter-observer reliability were assessed for human expert measurements, and repeated-measures one-way ANOVA was used to compare the AI and human expert measurements. The diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity and specificity tests.

Results

Human expert reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.9) for most cephalometric parameters. Compared to human experts, significant differences were observed for all three A

SUBMITTER: Baig N 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11490107 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature