Video-observed therapy (VOT) vs directly observed therapy (DOT) for tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review on adherence, cost of treatment observation, time spent observing treatment and patient satisfaction.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) treatment demands strict adherence to multidrug regimens. Directly Observed Therapy (DOT) poses challenges, especially regarding adherence. With the popularization of smartphones, Video-Observed Therapy (VOT) has emerged as a promising alternative, allowing healthcare providers to remotely supervise patients taking their medications via video calls.

Objectives

This systematic review critically assesses VOT's effectiveness compared to DOT, focusing on adherence, treatment costs, time spent supervising treatment, and patient satisfaction, aiming to optimize TB supervision methods worldwide.

Methods

Only studies that met the following criteria were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review: randomized trials; studies that compared VOT

SUBMITTER: Areas Lisboa Netto T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11508048 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature