Careless responding detection revisited: Accuracy of direct and indirect measures.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: To screen for careless responding, researchers have a choice between several direct measures (i.e., bogus items, requiring the respondent to choose a specific answer) and indirect measures (i.e., unobtrusive post hoc indices). Given the dearth of research in the area, we examined how well direct and indirect indices perform relative to each other. In five experimental studies, we investigated whether the detection rates of the measures are affected by contextual factors: severity of the careless response pattern, type of item keying, and type of item presentation. We fully controlled the information environment by experimentally inducing careless response sets under a variety of contextual conditions. In Studies 1 and 2, participants rated the personality of an actor that presented himself
SUBMITTER: Goldammer P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11525390 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA