Meta-analysis of tick-borne and other pathogens: Co-infection or co-detection? That is the question.

ABSTRACT: This literature-based review aims to distinguish studies describing co-infection with tick-borne pathogens from those describing co-detection or co-exposure scenarios. The review analyzed 426 papers and identified only 20 with direct evidence of co-infection in humans and animals, highlighting the need for accurate terminology and proposing definitions for co-infection, co-exposure and co-detection. Current diagnostic methods - including serology and molecular techniques - have limitations in accurately identifying real co-infections, often leading to misinterpretation. The review highlights the importance of developing laboratory models to better understand tick-borne pathogen interactions, and advocates improved diagnostic strategies for tick screening by testing their RNA for co-infecti

SUBMITTER: Porcelli S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11525461 | biostudies-literature | 2024

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature